BRIGGS wrote:I would not have picked Thomas at 36 but in terms of NBA fit/ talent profile-- I see the athletic Robinson fitting as a new age NBA 5 man more so than I see Knox at NBA 4-3. Now it's about the character work ethic and maturity process. Everything has to come together quick-- you can be a great basketball player but still not fit because of your actions. Well have to wait and see-- but raw basketball per position I'll give Robinson the nod.
I think Thomas would have been a better value for the slot at 36. But I can see why any team would really be drawn to Robinson. Watch the guy run the full length of the court. His mobility and speed, plus factoring in his length, can just be tantalizing if, and a huge IF, he puts it all together.
I'm not the biggest fan in the world about Knox, but Robinson is nowhere near the same level of prospect.
Knox needs 8-10-12 things to happen in his development to hit his ceiling.
For Robinson, it's like 34-36-38 things.
Tough thing to swallow ( Though I see you as a spitter Briggs...) , is that the Knicks drafted athletes first and foremost. Can these guys be molded into functional basketball players?
Here's the rub. Phil Jackson is gone. Good. Melo is gone. Good. Dolan is hands off now. Good. They have a GM with actual experience doing that kind of work. Good. They have a coach with experience doing that kind of work. Good. Knicks for too long made things harder than it had to be. Given the talent deficit on the roster, higher floor guys would just seem more practical given a Tier 3 type pick range.
Let's hope for the best. They are here now. No changing that.
He looks like Tarzan. Let's hope he stops thinking like Jane.