fishmike wrote:BRIGGS wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:Id love to get another pick and id be open to moving down BUT not at the expense of frank which you were talking about a few days ago. At 9 we are gonna get a good player and im convinced someone will fall that many arent expecting. At 36 you can also get a quality player
The only player Id use Frank and 9 to move up to is Bagley at 2. Id do that.
lol another scorer who plays **** defense. Did you hate being a Knick fan in the 90s or what?Briggs there are a ton of good NBA players in this draft. A few of them will be all stars. The things that separate Donovan Mitchell from Malik Monk are very small and very hard to quantify in the early stages.
Thing that jumps out at me about this draft is its loaded with athletes. There are a lot of really elite level athletic guys to choose from. There are going to be a couple guys who become real studs taken later in the first round and a lot of guys in the lottery who will be just good NBA players. Hopefully the Knicks can grab Carter or Mikal Bridges who have the lowest ceilings of everyone after them. You know you are getting a good NBA players, or as close to sure things that gets. Both have tremendous upside. Tons of wildcards out there as well including Knox, Miles Bridges, Sexton, Walker, ZSmith and Robert Williams are some guys who have some crazy physical attributes.
I think its wild draft. You have a few guys who could go anywhere from 3-12.. Doncic isnt working out and can pressure teams by staying in EU and playing for Real Madrid. Trea Young could go high or teams could pass. Porter?
Cant wait. I like our chance to get a very good player at 9
Yeah..I see this as a draft where we can get a quality player at #9. Just have to trust our scouts and brass, but there seems to be some depth this year...
...Then again, this has been said before...The KP draft was supposed to be pretty deep, yet you see a lot of weakness in the top 10...with 5-10 being a pedestrian group of players, at best, so far, and OK4 being a disappointment, too. If Russell hadn't redeemed himself a bit, you could've made a case that only 2/10- Towns and KP, were quality players, and that Turner, Booker, and Rozier, should have been top 10 selections.
Hard to figure, sometimes.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?