| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
Knixkik
Posts: 34900 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
3/28/2018 11:11 PM
BRIGGS wrote: These 2 players are not comparable. Bridges is an elite shooter and Frazier is average at best. |
|
SupremeCommander
Posts: 33785 Alba Posts: 35 Joined: 4/28/2006 Member: #1127 |
3/28/2018 11:11 PM
he's been on nbadraft.net all year
Sambakick wrote:
Gives a whole new meaning to "Jazz Hands"
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
3/29/2018 11:49 AM LAST EDITED: 3/29/2018 11:51 AM
Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote: When Jalen Brunson is nthe PG--youre goingh to have a lot of space. Tulane stinks but Frazier shot 55% while avg 16 points over 5 rebounds 3 assits and over 2 steals. I agree with you Bridges J is better right now--but what am I getting and where am I getting it? I like Frazier if hes there with one of our top 2nd rounders--Id go so far as to promise him pick 43 if he doesnt workout for anyone else. We need MORE than a role player at 9--we need someone who will make an impact. Id go as far to say that Mikal would be upsetting to me at 9 at this point. I can get something like Mikal in the 2nd round. Kevin Ollie who played 10 years in the nBA said Frazier has 1st team all caliber defensive potential and hes no sieve on offense. RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
Knixkik
Posts: 34900 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
3/29/2018 12:11 PM LAST EDITED: 3/29/2018 12:35 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote: You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. Let me add to this; Bridges' floor is high level role player most likely. Frazier's floor is D-league player. I think a prospects Floor needs to be emphasized when discussing their upside as well. |
|
martin
Posts: 68648 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
3/29/2018 1:34 PM
Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. Are there Mikal/Klay comparisons? Without knowing much about either player they seem similar? Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 37533 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
3/29/2018 1:45 PM
martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. Similar offensive games. I don't think scouts thought Klay would be as good as he is defensively. Mykal's length gives hiim more range defensively, IMHO. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
|
Knixkik
Posts: 34900 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
3/29/2018 1:48 PM LAST EDITED: 3/29/2018 1:49 PM
martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. Yeah i'll have to search around but have seen the comparisons on Bleacher Report and/or The Ringer. Both are elite spot up shooters, smooth but not freak athletes, and great defensive instincts. Both came out of college projected as elite role players who lack the off the dribble game to be offensive stars. |
|
martin
Posts: 68648 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
3/29/2018 1:55 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. I could be wrong but wasn't Klay considered an ELITE college scorer? Maybe not athletically explosive but high level offense? Is Mikal regarded in the same way? Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
3/29/2018 1:59 PM
martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. He was Wsshington State's best player and could make his own shot with the dribble RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
Knixkik
Posts: 34900 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
3/29/2018 3:14 PM
BRIGGS wrote:martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. Mikal is on a loaded team where he is asked to be more of a system player. His offensive efficiency is insane. Klay had more responsibility on a lesser quality team. |
|
Knixkik
Posts: 34900 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
3/29/2018 3:18 PM
martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. He was considered good, but there was a reason he wasn't top 10. There were concerns that he was only an elite scorer because of the team he was on and less quality competition. Bridges is asked to be more of a system player on an annual title contender. Obviously some differences between the 2. Klay was definitely a better scorer, and Bridges a better defender. I don't 100% agree with the comparison, just stating that it's out there. I see him as more of a Otto Porter, who makes 100M because of his valued skillset. |
|
SupremeCommander
Posts: 33785 Alba Posts: 35 Joined: 4/28/2006 Member: #1127 |
3/29/2018 3:32 PM LAST EDITED: 3/29/2018 3:35 PM
martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. I think it's a lazy comp. Both shot good percentages, play same (college) position, and both will get drafted around the same spot. That's about it Sambakick wrote:
Gives a whole new meaning to "Jazz Hands"
|
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 37533 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
3/29/2018 4:16 PM LAST EDITED: 3/29/2018 4:18 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:You keep selling Bridges as a role player, which is fine, but there are a lot of articles out there that think he's the next Kawhi, the next Klay, etc. He is getting many star comps. Yeah, Klay was considered an elite shooter, but his dribble game left a lot to be desired. I remember Allen Houston was a common comp used for Klay in college. Things change. Klay and Mykal excelled on the same areas of the floor in offense. I think the Otto Porter comp is probably as close a comp as you're going to get at this point and, if I remember correctly, Porter was getting Marion comps when he came out. Porter was springier in college, but Mykal is bigger. But yeah, I think scouts see Mykal as more of a guy in the Marion/Porter mold. A lot of people think Mykal can play the 4 effectively when he fills out. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|