Author | Thread |
martin
Posts: 69117 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
3/29/2018 11:31 AM
HofstraBBall wrote:Was not saying Green is not a good "Role" player. Think we agree that he was a player who had quetion marks at draft and was thought as more of a role piece, Perfect guy to take at 35. My point was more that "Role" players should not be taken at 8. ie. Frank. As mentioned, Green is a great compliment to three of the best players in the NBA. But lets not make it out to be that he would be experiencing this tyoe of success without them. Draymond is also a perfect guy to draft at 8-13 in pretty much any year, no less 35, with hindsight. http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-history/2012/all/all/ A high-level starter and borderline all-star is exactly what you would like baring an explosion of a player, and those are rare. Green IS a great compliment but I think most coaches also understand his value and it seems like you are underselling it. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
AUTOADVERT |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
3/29/2018 12:01 PM
The thing that seems to be overlooked is that there was NO SECRET that Frank wasn't a dynamic Offensive player. They KNEW that his offense was behind the curve of the other Guards available. The idea is that his defensive potential was so high that it was worth waiting for his offense to catch up. Frank is looking like he's going to be perfect for Position-less Basketball. As he matures you can play him and not worry about who you put next to him. They didn't draft him to be a Primary Scorer. Who would look at his game and assume that he was going to be that kind of player? However, Frank WILL IMPROVE. You can see that he's not devoid of the ability to improve his offense. There are flashes of it and after a FUL SUMMER of work I suspect he'll make a big jump next year.
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Now for the real reason he was drafted: |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 37755 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
3/29/2018 12:04 PM
EnySpree wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:EnySpree wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:EnySpree wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:EnySpree wrote:Andrew wrote:EnySpree wrote:Doesn't all this suggest he should be in the g- league? Xavier Rathan-Mayes Been there all year and got called up to Memphis... played well... actually better than Frank has here... then gets called back to Westchester You're on that ish. I don't even think you know what your poblem is anymore. You should just avoid Frank talk if it aggravates you this much. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
3/29/2018 1:08 PM
nixluva wrote:The thing that seems to be overlooked is that there was NO SECRET that Frank wasn't a dynamic Offensive player. They KNEW that his offense was behind the curve of the other Guards available. The idea is that his defensive potential was so high that it was worth waiting for his offense to catch up. Frank is looking like he's going to be perfect for Position-less Basketball. As he matures you can play him and not worry about who you put next to him. They didn't draft him to be a Primary Scorer. Who would look at his game and assume that he was going to be that kind of player? However, Frank WILL IMPROVE. You can see that he's not devoid of the ability to improve his offense. There are flashes of it and after a FUL SUMMER of work I suspect he'll make a big jump next year.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: lol, he had his best half? so your posting footage of 10 MINUTES WORTH OF GOOD PLAY out of 73 games I guess I can post Kornet who had a exceptional half a couple of wks ago , why your not boasting about his potential ES
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 37755 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
3/29/2018 1:32 PM
knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:The thing that seems to be overlooked is that there was NO SECRET that Frank wasn't a dynamic Offensive player. They KNEW that his offense was behind the curve of the other Guards available. The idea is that his defensive potential was so high that it was worth waiting for his offense to catch up. Frank is looking like he's going to be perfect for Position-less Basketball. As he matures you can play him and not worry about who you put next to him. They didn't draft him to be a Primary Scorer. Who would look at his game and assume that he was going to be that kind of player? However, Frank WILL IMPROVE. You can see that he's not devoid of the ability to improve his offense. There are flashes of it and after a FUL SUMMER of work I suspect he'll make a big jump next year.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
ekstarks94
Posts: 21011 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/5/2015 Member: #6104 |
3/29/2018 6:37 PM
nixluva wrote:The thing that seems to be overlooked is that there was NO SECRET that Frank wasn't a dynamic Offensive player. They KNEW that his offense was behind the curve of the other Guards available. The idea is that his defensive potential was so high that it was worth waiting for his offense to catch up. Frank is looking like he's going to be perfect for Position-less Basketball. As he matures you can play him and not worry about who you put next to him. They didn't draft him to be a Primary Scorer. Who would look at his game and assume that he was going to be that kind of player? However, Frank WILL IMPROVE. You can see that he's not devoid of the ability to improve his offense. There are flashes of it and after a FUL SUMMER of work I suspect he'll make a big jump next year.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Once again on the moneyj |