Bonn1997 wrote:BRIGGS wrote:reub wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Give Beasley the starting 3 and play Dotson instead of Baker
Beasley sucks at the three.
Beasley stinks at 3? Than where do we classify Lance Thomas?
I'd rather play Beasley 32 min At 3
Also Ronny baker has been given non stop opportunity-- more so than many players. He's going to be 25 and is showing nothing?
Beasley has been a turnover machine, which makes him one of the least efficient high usage players in the league (97 pts per 100 possessions). The turnovers negate any scoring he brings.
Bonn - here's the deal, obviously if we had Kevin Durant sitting on the bench this is an easy decision. All of our current options are flawed: Thomas, McDermott, and Beasley. I don't know about continuing to start Thomas because he has a low turnover rate when his production is also very low. He turns the ball over so little because he's usually doing very little on the court.
As much as it pains me to admit this, I think Briggs may have a point on this one. Recently Beasley seems to respond when we have needed to rely on him the most, i.e. one of his big issues is focus. Maybe trying him in the starting lineup mitigates that a bit? I would more concerned about his negative impact on ball movement, but even there he has shown himself to be a willing passer. I hate the thought of relying on Beasley for anything, but what choice do we have at this point?
Regarding Baker, he is what he is. People expecting him to develop into more than what he already is are likely to be a little disappointed.