SupremeCommander wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:Would be fearful of Beasley's D at the 3, but we will have to wait and see.I would be happy to be proven wrong about him, though. Harder for a player his age to turn around an aspect of his game, but who knows. I see him more of a 4 in a smaller, offensively minded lineup, where KP is at the 5 and THJ is at the 3, but who knows what will happen.
he's your classic tweener... part of the reason that he's considered a draft bust
Yup...
If I recall correctly...he was listed at 6'10" before the draft by some folks (not sure on the exact height, though), but measured in at 6'7" w/o shoes at the draft combine.
More important than his size, is that he is more of an ISO player on offense, who doesn't seem to grasp the concept of team D.
Will still be rooting for him...you always want to see a player salvage his career. Would be a great story if he could emerge as a solid and well-rounded performer for us, but he has been around for a long time, and seemingly missed many opportunities to grow as a player. What is different now?
Right now I see him as a guy you bring in when the offense is not clicking, and you hope he can catch fire or exploit a match-up, but I can't picture him as a starting SF.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?