arkrud wrote:NardDogNation wrote:arkrud wrote:NardDogNation wrote:arkrud wrote:Some people have some kind of short circuit in their brains...
Anything that happening is political and Trumps fault.
He was probably the main reason for sun eclipse...
The storm is a much bigger issue for pure people of all kind who will be hardest hit as usual.
It's a shame that we as a country cannot invest in safety infrastructure for most vulnerable areas.
This were the government investment should go not in bailing out failing corporation and providing millions of useless government jobs.
US leadership suck big time all Dems, Reps, Obamas and Trumps including. Bunch of useless losers.
Everything you just mentioned that is exacerbating the situation (e.g. political parties sucking, tax dollars being misappropriated, lack of infrastructure) is rooted in politics. Yet, in the same breathe, you are criticizing people who think politics is central to this disaster. Quite a bit of irony with you.
My point was again that placing blame on any of specific politicians is ironic by itself.
They do not differ from each other in being interested only in their own political capital not the needs of those whom they should represent.
The system of governing is corrupt in general and became some kind of corporation to get profits and guarantied income for doing nothing.
And as all sides are one big mafia there is no accountability.
I don't think you understand the meaning of "irony". That aside, any one individual or any group that champions stupidity with regards to environmental regulations deserves blame for this. Polticially, only Republicans fit the bill.
Besides, let's not kid ourselves into thinking that a guy like BRIGGS doesn't vote a straight-ticket that uniformly denies climate change and cuts research to understand its scope.
There is no way we can help with climate change issues by participating in Paris kind of pacts which clearly used to feed the bureaucracies of a bunch of countries who are in fact the biggest polluters.
The US carbon profile as well as other developed countries is falling down fast with renewables and electric engines proliferation.
Fossil fuels based technologies are not profitable any more and have no future.
But if world will stop using it the developing counties will be hit the most and will not be able to even feed its unnecessary growing population.
We already see the unraveling happening. World need to stay on this drag for quite a while to avoid catastrophic failures of many more countries all over the world.
And for us the main goal should be to protect and improve infrastructure to make it less prone to catastrophic climate events which are not avoidable regardless of what we will declare in any kind of accords.
So countries opening dialogue to establish means and goals for addressing climate change is a bad idea?
And if the goal is to address climate change, do you think that banning the word "climate change" from government sites, selecting a climate-change denier to run the EPA (Rick Perry), cutting research into studying climate change, approving infrastructure projects that expand the use of fossil fuels, etc. is an appropriate means to deal with this issue? Because these are all things happening under the Trump administration, spurred on by rank-and-fill Republicans.