Ok, you really need to stick to the topic instead of going off into your little fantasy land and switching the discussion to your role playing. It would really make having a discussion with you a little easier.

First it we were talking about Marbury, then it was about RJ and Melo then it was about Layden. Make up your mind already.

Posted by islesfan:

Ok, you really need to stick to the topic instead of going off into your little fantasy land and switching the discussion to your role playing. It would really make having a discussion with you a little easier.

First it we were talking about Marbury, then it was about RJ and Melo then it was about Layden. Make up your mind already.

Scott, all I asked you to do is show me Solace's statement. If you didn't want me to ask for the statement, you should have known better than to bring it up. You can't have it both ways by going off topic (by talking about Solace's comments that he actually never made) and then blame me for commenting on what you said.

Bringing up RJ and Carmelo Anthony's scum-bucket performances is perfectly acceptable. Marbury's poor play is part of the subtext of the horrific play of the Olympic team. Fishmike is correct in pointing that out. If the scope of the conversation is Marbury's impact on the Olympic team, the collective struggle of the team and the performances of other players have to be considered. I don't think Fishmike or Bonn are denying Marbury's inefficiency - just tempering criticism by pointing out that the entire USA team has struggled with adjusting to the international style.