[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Ive noticed on both mocks without exception
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/16/2017  11:18 AM
even when they change--the same guy going to us is Monk.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40242
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/16/2017  11:31 AM
BRIGGS wrote:even when they change--the same guy going to us is Monk.

I've noticed that too. It doesn't seem to jibe with media reports. Chad Ford has us taking Smith. Who knows? This is the stretch where the BS really begins to pile up in terms of reports from "team sources."

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
NYKBocker
Posts: 38514
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/16/2017  11:37 AM
I would be just fine with Monk. An athletic guard that can shoot. Something we really need.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/16/2017  11:42 AM
I think its still based on projected order.

Lets face it... Monk brings a lot to the table, especially off the ball. Also he would join Baker/Lee who are two good defensive players.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

6/16/2017  11:46 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/16/2017  11:58 AM
He would be a really solid safe pick.
We know he has NBA level shooting ability. NBA level athleticism and speed.
His position is what is the main issue.
Could be a bit undersized for a 2, not really skilled enough in PG ability to be a point.
Monk will need to be an outstanding scorer at point and be matched up with a 2 guard that can play point.
Ironically we have that with Baker. Baker's a guard that can play 2, and does many PG qualities well in the Triangle.
If we trade Melo to the Clippers, Austin Rivers is another 2 guard that can match up well with Monk in the backcourt.

I would be happy with a talent like Monk at 8. There are so many question marks about some of the other picks. Too much could, maybe, potential. With Monk, there are a couple of things right away you could see him do at the NBA level and contribute. If he's a really hard worker, he could become an all-star scorer. Worst case, he's a 6th man type of instant offense guy off the bench. At worst, a top 6 player, at best a possible all-star.

If it's between Monk, DSJ and Nti (which I don't think it will be, I only see one of them on the board at 8) I would take Monk, Nti then DSJ in that order. Love Nti's defensive potential and youth, but too many times we've been screwed in the draft in Knicks history drafting where we are. Too many Balkman's, Sweetney's and those types.

Anyway, I'm excited about this team's future. We've got Willy and KP up front. We will likely have one of DSJ/Monk/Nti in the backcourt. We would have 3 core players with an average age of 20.5-21, all with 2 or less years of league experience. The Knicks wouldn't have had that kind of balance in young talent (A post big like Willy, unicorn like KP, a young guard) in a long time.

Whomever we take at 8, I just hope he fits in with KP/Willy and the future. The Knicks have a great chance on draft day to change the way this franchise will be for the next 8 to 10 years. Can't stress enough the importance of drafting a great fit next to KP/Willy. A guard is the right way to go, lets just hope it's the right guard. We all saw how DRose never fit in. DSJ has all the athletic tools and is an attack guard, but will he fit in? I lean towards Nti and Monk as fitting in better with a High IQ pass first guy like Baker or trading for Rubio to run the point.

GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/16/2017  11:54 AM
One unexpected pick at the top of the draft could really throw a wrench in all these mock drafts. If there was ever a year for the draft to go in an unexpected way, its this one. Its deep, and teams have a lot of needs.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

6/16/2017  2:50 PM
BRIGGS wrote:even when they change--the same guy going to us is Monk.

Pretty much everything any new york media people say is that Frank Nitty is at the top of the Knicks list and i agree.

dacash
Posts: 21141
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/17/2006
Member: #1179

6/16/2017  3:42 PM
well i think trading for rubio and picking monk is a nice back court
Knixkik
Posts: 35753
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/16/2017  3:52 PM
BRIGGS wrote:even when they change--the same guy going to us is Monk.

Basically mocks are assuming we will take the remaining elite-level guard. For awhile it has been either Monk or Smith. But either of them could also go as high as 3rd. Ntilikina has been long considered a notch below those 2 guys, but realistically, it seems like they are the 3 most realistic options.

EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

6/16/2017  5:34 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:even when they change--the same guy going to us is Monk.

Pretty much everything any new york media people say is that Frank Nitty is at the top of the Knicks list and i agree.

If the Knicks don't get them they have a bunch of negative narratives to go with. They should have traded up, they should have lost more games, how could they pass up on Monk and Frenchy?...

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/16/2017  6:44 PM
EnySpree wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:even when they change--the same guy going to us is Monk.

Pretty much everything any new york media people say is that Frank Nitty is at the top of the Knicks list and i agree.

If the Knicks don't get them they have a bunch of negative narratives to go with. They should have traded up, they should have lost more games, how could they pass up on Monk and Frenchy?...


The more I hear, and read, the more sure I am that Smith wont be there at 8 for the Knicks. I also think wants Monk unless Ball falls and moves #3 for 5 and 10 with Sac. If that happens I think Philly takes Monk at 5. Tatum could fall to 7,8. I also think there is a good chance Fox is there at 5 if Sac doesn't trade up.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Paris907
Posts: 21146
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2015
Member: #6099
USA
6/16/2017  6:47 PM
I'm good with Monk. Super athlete quick can slash and a killer quick release on his J
Ive noticed on both mocks without exception

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy