[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Would you be willing to trade pick #8 to Portland for 15-20-26?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
BRIGGS
Posts: 33275
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
Just checking to see. Im not sure there's a star at 8 but I feel good that a multitude of players in rd 1 will be quality players.
No the one player adds too much quality
Yes we have many holes and 3 picks gives us much more latitude to fill them
View Results


Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Knixkik
Posts: 34905
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/23/2017  2:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/23/2017  2:36 PM
No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.
AUTOADVERT
dacash
Posts: 21141
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/17/2006
Member: #1179
5/23/2017  2:52 PM
im thinking yes, depends on what we get back in the melo trade, if we make a meo trade and get something nice this year yes but its dicey
fishmike
Posts: 53134
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/23/2017  2:53 PM
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.
Im in this boat. Quantity you can get elsewhere. I bet Willy and Ron Baker are better than more picks at 20-26 so its a no for me. I would have done something like this in the Jordan Hill draft when I think we really needed an infusion of youth. We are very young. We need a blue chip player.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Chandler
Posts: 26011
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197
5/23/2017  2:57 PM
don't do it.

There are far more failures at multiple late picks than one early one, including with the Knicks, Celts and many others

If we trade down it should be just a smidge because we think our guy will still be there

(5)(5)
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239
5/23/2017  3:05 PM
I bet this blows up more times than it has worked for the team getting multiple lower picks.
Knixkik
Posts: 34905
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/23/2017  3:07 PM
fishmike wrote:
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.
Im in this boat. Quantity you can get elsewhere. I bet Willy and Ron Baker are better than more picks at 20-26 so its a no for me. I would have done something like this in the Jordan Hill draft when I think we really needed an infusion of youth. We are very young. We need a blue chip player.

Yeah, the opportunity to draft a #2 guy should be there at 8. It's all about drafting the right person. From 15-on, can't say the same thing for sure. Would rather use the 2nd round to find depth. There are Willy's and Ron Baker's out there every year in the 2nd round that can help with depth.
Kemet
Posts: 22087
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/23/2015
Member: #6148
5/23/2017  4:07 PM
When u have Phil Jackson selecting draft picks .. having 3 first round picks will not help his poor selection.
Chandler
Posts: 26011
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197
5/23/2017  4:09 PM
Kemet wrote:When u have Phil Jackson selecting draft picks .. having 3 first round picks will not help his poor selection.

can you name a bad pick from Phil in the first round? Just curious, I raised this the other day. I might be forgetting someone but he has a pretty good record

(5)(5)
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2017  4:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/23/2017  4:16 PM
Knixkik wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.
Im in this boat. Quantity you can get elsewhere. I bet Willy and Ron Baker are better than more picks at 20-26 so its a no for me. I would have done something like this in the Jordan Hill draft when I think we really needed an infusion of youth. We are very young. We need a blue chip player.

Yeah, the opportunity to draft a #2 guy should be there at 8. It's all about drafting the right person. From 15-on, can't say the same thing for sure. Would rather use the 2nd round to find depth. There are Willy's and Ron Baker's out there every year in the 2nd round that can help with depth.

Id bet the cumulative value of picks in most drafts are superior to pick #8 For example in 2013 you couldve had Giannis #15 Dieng #20 and Gobert #26--the 8th pick that year was Pope from Detroit. Game changing draft versus ultimately a fringe starter.

RIP Crushalot😞
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538
5/23/2017  4:15 PM
fishmike wrote:
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.
Im in this boat. Quantity you can get elsewhere. I bet Willy and Ron Baker are better than more picks at 20-26 so its a no for me. I would have done something like this in the Jordan Hill draft when I think we really needed an infusion of youth. We are very young. We need a blue chip player.

Willy I agree but Ron Baker would be easy to beat.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2017  4:21 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.
Im in this boat. Quantity you can get elsewhere. I bet Willy and Ron Baker are better than more picks at 20-26 so its a no for me. I would have done something like this in the Jordan Hill draft when I think we really needed an infusion of youth. We are very young. We need a blue chip player.

Willy I agree but Ron Baker would be easy to beat.

Ronny Baker is 5 years older than theses guys. He was on the fringe of being cut--now hes an all star --Im rooting for him for sure--but my expectations are tempered.

RIP Crushalot😞
BigDaddyG
Posts: 37543
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/23/2017  4:25 PM
Chandler wrote:
Kemet wrote:When u have Phil Jackson selecting draft picks .. having 3 first round picks will not help his poor selection.

can you name a bad pick from Phil in the first round? Just curious, I raised this the other day. I might be forgetting someone but he has a pretty good record

Lol he really doesn't have a track record except porzingis. Gaines is well respected tho. The problem with trading down is you have no idea how any particular draft lines up until your minutes away from making a selection, outside of the top 2, who appear to be locked in. I'm definitely open to trading down, tho.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
reub
Posts: 21836
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2016
Member: #6227
5/23/2017  4:29 PM
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.

Who is this star that we're getting at #8? Frank Ntilikina?
We could have Diallo, OG and Hart instead.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 37543
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/23/2017  4:44 PM
reub wrote:
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.

Who is this star that we're getting at #8? Frank Ntilikina?
We could have Diallo, OG and Hart instead.

We don't know who we'll get. I think there may be quite a bit of fluidity with picks 3-10 heading into draft. It would be one thing if we saw Diallo lace up during the season, but he's a question mark. He could be Kobe or he could be Felipe Lopez. Workouts will be key.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2017  5:16 PM
It would be interesting to see the metrics on this. That said, like half of the 3 all nba teams' players were picked 15 or later. I think you give yourself better odds with 3 picks than 1.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/23/2017  5:35 PM
Portland and Utah may be willing to sell a pick without is having to trade down.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
5/23/2017  5:46 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/23/2017  5:46 PM
Knixkik wrote:No. Never trade down when you have the opportunity to draft a young star. Quality over quantity. Trade-downs very rarely work out. Drafting BPA does.

Eddie Griffith for Richard Jefferson, Collins and brandon Armstrong.... worked really well for the Nets

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2017  5:48 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:It would be interesting to see the metrics on this. That said, like half of the 3 all nba teams' players were picked 15 or later. I think you give yourself better odds with 3 picks than 1.

It depends on the depth of the draft Bonn. Many times--you'd probably say no way. This draft a bit different. Also Im not sure what we are doing with Carmelo. If hes going--I think IF available--Id take the 3 picks. After Fox--I dont view any PG with that much over the other for the next 3-4 taken. You can also be risky with one of the picks

RIP Crushalot😞
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
5/23/2017  5:55 PM
Terence Ferguson, Justin Jackson, Diallo, Frank Jackson, Bacon are just some projected late first rounders i would take with Portland's 3 picks
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
GustavBahler
Posts: 41138
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186
5/23/2017  5:57 PM
Depends on wether or not the scouting dept feels strongly about who will be available, and their ability to contribute. Its the only part of the franchise right now that I would give the benefit of the doubt.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Would you be willing to trade pick #8 to Portland for 15-20-26?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy