Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
martin
Posts: 68680 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
4/18/2017 8:00 PM
GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:GustavBahler wrote:fishmike wrote:stupid Knick fans. Not one of you asked the terms. 4 years $100mm? Or 2 years and $25mm like a Rondo type deal? Not all circumstances are equal. Again, the costs. Most all contenders are waaayyy over the limit (when you factor in guys they will undoubtedly resign). http://www.basketball-reference.com/contracts/ And since that is the case, they would need to MOVE players without taking back contracts. And THEN you can think about a big, one year deal. Not easy. And all of this for a guy who can't pass, doesn't play D, AND is coming off of knee surgery. Again. Meaning he may miss significant time or all of the playoffs. I don't see even a 1 year big deal in those circumstances. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
martin
Posts: 68680 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
4/18/2017 9:56 PM
TPercy wrote: You have to present this much better. I don't know where you are getting your numbers either. http://www.basketball-reference.com/contracts/ Example:
Toronto seems to have $28M of cap BEFORE they need to resign Ibaka, Lowry, Patterson, Tucker, draft pick? Also, cap holds. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|