[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Phil's press conference
Author Thread
smackeddog
Posts: 38386
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
4/14/2017  4:57 PM
knicks1248 wrote:stupid contradicting statements like "MELO PLAYED GREAT IN HIS ROLE FOR US HE PRETTY MUCH CARRIED THE LOAD, BUT WE CAN'T WIN WITH HIM. that should have been followed up with , "And we have zero shot without him"

But at least the young players will get to play unselfish ball, team defense and will get to take shots with the game on the line. With the losses come high draft picks. Keeping melo achieves nothing

AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53199
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/14/2017  4:58 PM
Max effort and team ball. If your not in beat it. I like this.

Thanks Melo for the 54. It was the only memorable hoops in 15+ years.

Next....

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/14/2017  4:58 PM
I'm pretty clear on what Phil is all about. He wants Unselfish Team Ball, where the players give MAX EFFORT and play SMART and for each other. THAT IS THE PLAN!!! Just keep adding more players that have this mentality and eventually you will have a much better team.

If you look at the younger players and everyone except for Rose and Melo the team is full of guys that are pretty close to the ideal, but we need more FRONTLINE talent in order to win. That hopefully will be addressed this summer and next.

I don't think Rose will be brought back unless they simply aren't able to get anyone else. Rose doesn't fit the type of player we need. He's not unselfish and he's not a smart player that gives Max Effort either. There's also the cost of what he may want for a contract. I'd say the odds are low that they ring Rose back but not impossible.

fishmike
Posts: 53199
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/14/2017  5:01 PM
One mystery will finally be put to rest... what we can actually get in a trade. There will be a handful of teams willing to take a shot on a rejuvenated Melo moving needle for them and I think he can still do that.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/14/2017  5:01 PM
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

4/14/2017  5:03 PM
holfresh wrote:
ok....
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

4/14/2017  5:05 PM
martin wrote:
holfresh wrote:
martin wrote:
holfresh wrote:He said he thought the players at the end of the year was successful...They played hard defense...He gets sucked in by Admunson, Galloway, Baker, Plumlee and N'Dour trying to stick in the NDA..These guy can't win games...

So I don't get a comment like this. Phil was obviously talking about playing team ball and what that takes. Max effort and moving and passing and defense. And in those terms he found it better.

Winning/not winning, that may be a product of all of those things plus talent.

But he has to recognize who these guys are and why they are playing that way...They are trying to stick...Vets manage their time and minutes of the year..I think KP perfectly illustrates this...last year KP went all out and was flying all over the place..I thought this year, after playing a full season, he tried to manage his time and effort to be fresh over the course of a year..He go injured and didn't work out but vets won't do that game in and game out...Ball movement I get but the defense like that is taxing...

WTF is that mean? The defense like that is taxing?

Max effort and team ball. You don't guy into that, get off the team. I understand playing smartly so as to not get injured but that's not really the point. The point is not taking plays off on one side of the court.

But he has to recognize who these guys are and why they are playing that way...They are trying to stick...Vets manage their time and minutes of the year

I don't get this either? You don't think Phil understand or recognize who these guys are? That they are fighting for jobs? Of course man. They are also playing the right way. Max effort and team ball. Get with the program or get out.

I actually understand what holfresh is trying to get at...just a matter of pacing yourself. There is a tradeoff on the offensive end when you're defending every play like it is the last play of the finals.

Usual time to take a "rest" is on the offensive end, but here is where the Triangle becomes an issue for certain players because you always have to be on the move. Think about how some players stand around on offense waiting for the ball to be kicked out to them for a 3. Not much energy expended.

Then you look at Baker or Sasha and how they are moving on the court. Have to be an elite athlete to play truly tough D and also move around on offense like the Triangle calls for you to do, OR you have to be a 20MPG guy who can go hard because he knows he won't be on the court for 35 minutes each night.

Rose was clearly more concerned with saving his energy for the offensive end...and it showed when he was on D, and this is the reason why Phil will not resign him. Rose is not going to change his game at this point, and Phil must know this.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

4/14/2017  5:08 PM
martin wrote:
holfresh wrote:
martin wrote:
holfresh wrote:
martin wrote:
holfresh wrote:He said he thought the players at the end of the year was successful...They played hard defense...He gets sucked in by Admunson, Galloway, Baker, Plumlee and N'Dour trying to stick in the NDA..These guy can't win games...

So I don't get a comment like this. Phil was obviously talking about playing team ball and what that takes. Max effort and moving and passing and defense. And in those terms he found it better.

Winning/not winning, that may be a product of all of those things plus talent.

But he has to recognize who these guys are and why they are playing that way...They are trying to stick...Vets manage their time and minutes of the year..I think KP perfectly illustrates this...last year KP went all out and was flying all over the place..I thought this year, after playing a full season, he tried to manage his time and effort to be fresh over the course of a year..He go injured and didn't work out but vets won't do that game in and game out...Ball movement I get but the defense like that is taxing...

WTF is that mean? The defense like that is taxing?

Max effort and team ball. You don't guy into that, get off the team. I understand playing smartly so as to not get injured but that's not really the point. The point is not taking plays off on one side of the court.

But he has to recognize who these guys are and why they are playing that way...They are trying to stick...Vets manage their time and minutes of the year

I don't get this either? You don't think Phil understand or recognize who these guys are? That they are fighting for jobs? Of course man. They are also playing the right way. Max effort and team ball. Get with the program or get out.

We could actually discuss this at length..First off Melo is not a 3..He is a 4 and the best defender at the position on this team...Are the Knicks willing to do that????..They won't do it because of KP...

I don't want to discuss it at length.

MAX EFFORT. TEAM BALL. NO TAKING PLAYS OFF.

I have no clue what you want to talk about.

Translation: Anthony is not able to run after 3's on D, and is not going to be cutting and moving a lot without the ball on O.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
fwk00
Posts: 22136
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

4/14/2017  5:08 PM
A very satisfying presser.

As many of us speculated, Phil is attempting what might most reasonably be called a "competitive rebuild". Competitive in the sense that he is actively building with youth (he mentioned our three draft picks) and competitive in signing and trading for talent (he mentioned that no one was untouchable).

As is often repeated, "The [this team] could lose as many games without [its star] as with him". I think Phil provided the best explanation of why Melo needs to move on and that is to avoid a legacy of perpetual failure that he will own if he stays. And Phil expects the same teams who would refuse moving a core player at mid-season to be more amenable to it after a playoff failure. And if the league stiffs the Knicks into keeping Melo, Phil gave fair warning that its no longer about Melo.

He also outlined the kind of players he wants to draft - not necessarily the high profile one or two dimensional players but two way, team players. It will be fun to see who the Knicks draft.

Why Isola plays Captain Obvious in his remark about Melo not being the only resistor is dumbfounding. Does he really believe Phil doesn't know that? Moronic tweet.

I get the impression that Phil does respect Rose. But I also think Rose has an uphill battle to get resigned here and that if he does, it will be on Phil's terms and not Rose's. Chances are that Rose coming off the bench as a two guard might be very effective assuming Rose recovers. OTOH, I wouldn't hold my breath.

Yesterday I found Melo's claim that all he wanted was "to win" as bizarre. Why does he think the teammates he has don't want to win? Or the coaches? Or Phil? Or Dolan?
Melo seems to think he's the only one who wants to win and will hold his breath until the Knicks start winning. "I just want to win." No sh@t.

WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

4/14/2017  5:10 PM
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:

Yeah, I'm not sure how I feel about bringing back Rose.

I don't know if we can get a guy like Jrue Holiday, Teague, or George Hill in FA though.


Don't think Phil wants him back...no way.

He is not even a player that moves well without the ball, so if he is an off guard he will still have to do his normal thing.

If Rose had great court vision I'd put up with his defensive deficiencies, but perimeter D is essential.

He said Rose plays well with Noah...I think he brings Rose back so Noah doesn't die on the vine..


I'll go gentleman's bet with you on that.

Think about the contract Rose would want at this point...and after all is said and done he ended the season yet with another leg injury.

Not going to lie...it is amazing how he can take it to the basket at will, and I don't care that he can't shoot well from 3 because his midrange Js are so efficient.

BUT his D is lame- he shows no scrappiness on that end, and you see him missing open looks all the time.

I'll be stunned if Phil offers him the 4y/$100M type contract he will be looking for.

If that is your position then this should concern you...He will be looking for a player to replace Melo..He said he isn't rebuilding like Chicago because they have been doing it since 1999..

Yup...that would concern me, but only if the guy is not 25 or younger.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
fwk00
Posts: 22136
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

4/14/2017  5:12 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
ok....

Leonard DiCaprio on the Titanic. LMAO.

WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

4/14/2017  5:13 PM
crzymdups wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:

Yeah, I'm not sure how I feel about bringing back Rose.

I don't know if we can get a guy like Jrue Holiday, Teague, or George Hill in FA though.


Don't think Phil wants him back...no way.

He is not even a player that moves well without the ball, so if he is an off guard he will still have to do his normal thing.

If Rose had great court vision I'd put up with his defensive deficiencies, but perimeter D is essential.

He said Rose plays well with Noah...I think he brings Rose back so Noah doesn't die on the vine..


I'll go gentleman's bet with you on that.

Think about the contract Rose would want at this point...and after all is said and done he ended the season yet with another leg injury.

Not going to lie...it is amazing how he can take it to the basket at will, and I don't care that he can't shoot well from 3 because his midrange Js are so efficient.

BUT his D is lame- he shows no scrappiness on that end, and you see him missing open looks all the time.

I'll be stunned if Phil offers him the 4y/$100M type contract he will be looking for.

Yeah no one is saying that though. No one will give Rose that money, particularly after his most recent injury. I think it is very fair to say Phil specifically left the door open for a Rose return. I think the circumstances would have to be - the Knicks strike out in FA and Rose doesn't get a good offer from anywhere else, the Knicks may make him a modest offer. I don't know if it's likely. But I could certainly see it happening. Phil definitely left the door open if you watch him talking about Rose.

I think Phil was being diplomatic about bringing Rose back, and we know Rose is signing for less than near max...just ain't happening on his last significant contract negotiation.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
4/14/2017  5:13 PM
fwk00 wrote:A very satisfying presser.

As many of us speculated, Phil is attempting what might most reasonably be called a "competitive rebuild". Competitive in the sense that he is actively building with youth (he mentioned our three draft picks) and competitive in signing and trading for talent (he mentioned that no one was untouchable).

As is often repeated, "The [this team] could lose as many games without [its star] as with him". I think Phil provided the best explanation of why Melo needs to move on and that is to avoid a legacy of perpetual failure that he will own if he stays. And Phil expects the same teams who would refuse moving a core player at mid-season to be more amenable to it after a playoff failure. And if the league stiffs the Knicks into keeping Melo, Phil gave fair warning that its no longer about Melo.

He also outlined the kind of players he wants to draft - not necessarily the high profile one or two dimensional players but two way, team players. It will be fun to see who the Knicks draft.

Why Isola plays Captain Obvious in his remark about Melo not being the only resistor is dumbfounding. Does he really believe Phil doesn't know that? Moronic tweet.

I get the impression that Phil does respect Rose. But I also think Rose has an uphill battle to get resigned here and that if he does, it will be on Phil's terms and not Rose's. Chances are that Rose coming off the bench as a two guard might be very effective assuming Rose recovers. OTOH, I wouldn't hold my breath.

Yesterday I found Melo's claim that all he wanted was "to win" as bizarre. Why does he think the teammates he has don't want to win? Or the coaches? Or Phil? Or Dolan?
Melo seems to think he's the only one who wants to win and will hold his breath until the Knicks start winning. "I just want to win." No sh@t.

Yeah, it's all a lot of fun to be able to blame Melo. But the chips will be on the table once he's gone and guys like KP might start paying attention to just how competitive the rebuild is...

Looks like KP is paying attention to Melo right now.

Question is did Phil's performance today make it easier to trade Melo... or harder? Time will tell.

¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
4/14/2017  5:15 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:

Yeah, I'm not sure how I feel about bringing back Rose.

I don't know if we can get a guy like Jrue Holiday, Teague, or George Hill in FA though.


Don't think Phil wants him back...no way.

He is not even a player that moves well without the ball, so if he is an off guard he will still have to do his normal thing.

If Rose had great court vision I'd put up with his defensive deficiencies, but perimeter D is essential.

He said Rose plays well with Noah...I think he brings Rose back so Noah doesn't die on the vine..


I'll go gentleman's bet with you on that.

Think about the contract Rose would want at this point...and after all is said and done he ended the season yet with another leg injury.

Not going to lie...it is amazing how he can take it to the basket at will, and I don't care that he can't shoot well from 3 because his midrange Js are so efficient.

BUT his D is lame- he shows no scrappiness on that end, and you see him missing open looks all the time.

I'll be stunned if Phil offers him the 4y/$100M type contract he will be looking for.

Yeah no one is saying that though. No one will give Rose that money, particularly after his most recent injury. I think it is very fair to say Phil specifically left the door open for a Rose return. I think the circumstances would have to be - the Knicks strike out in FA and Rose doesn't get a good offer from anywhere else, the Knicks may make him a modest offer. I don't know if it's likely. But I could certainly see it happening. Phil definitely left the door open if you watch him talking about Rose.

I think Phil was being diplomatic about bringing Rose back, and we know Rose is signing for less than near max...just ain't happening on his last significant contract negotiation.

But, really, who in the league would give Rose that money? The Kings?? Who else?

I'm saying I think there's a VERY good chance he doesn't get anywhere NEAR that money. If you're an executive and you give Rose 4yr/$100M and he goes down with a knee injury next year, you are fired. He might get some high 1 and 1 offers like 2yr/$50M with the second year a team option.

I'm saying I don't think he'll get a big offer. He might've if he hadn't needed another knee surgery to close out the year. Now? I really really don't see it.

¿ △ ?
fwk00
Posts: 22136
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

4/14/2017  5:16 PM
holfresh wrote:
martin wrote:
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:

Yeah, I'm not sure how I feel about bringing back Rose.

I don't know if we can get a guy like Jrue Holiday, Teague, or George Hill in FA though.


Don't think Phil wants him back...no way.

He is not even a player that moves well without the ball, so if he is an off guard he will still have to do his normal thing.

If Rose had great court vision I'd put up with his defensive deficiencies, but perimeter D is essential.

He said Rose plays well with Noah...I think he brings Rose back so Noah doesn't die on the vine..

Man you take everything out of context or are not really paying attention. I think the statement was about previous to this year. That those guys had played together and maybe that would help the team and both of them out. It was quite clear to me that Rose is going to be an afterthought going forward.

You know what..I don't have the energy at the moment...We can pick this up later...The Organization is lost with Phil is what I took from that press conference..He has no plan...

Your comments are an anti-Phil monologue that has no plan to end. People like you who twist every word are the reason no one wants to talk to the press anymore. Putting an Orwellian spin on the presser is not even something you're good at. Go get your rest.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/14/2017  5:16 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/14/2017  5:17 PM
holfresh wrote:Melo has to leave..It's the only way Phil will take responsibility..Dude is delusional..

Presidents never take responsibility when things go wrong. They just shift to new excuses and give a new spin on reality.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

4/14/2017  5:17 PM
crzymdups wrote:
fwk00 wrote:A very satisfying presser.

As many of us speculated, Phil is attempting what might most reasonably be called a "competitive rebuild". Competitive in the sense that he is actively building with youth (he mentioned our three draft picks) and competitive in signing and trading for talent (he mentioned that no one was untouchable).

As is often repeated, "The [this team] could lose as many games without [its star] as with him". I think Phil provided the best explanation of why Melo needs to move on and that is to avoid a legacy of perpetual failure that he will own if he stays. And Phil expects the same teams who would refuse moving a core player at mid-season to be more amenable to it after a playoff failure. And if the league stiffs the Knicks into keeping Melo, Phil gave fair warning that its no longer about Melo.

He also outlined the kind of players he wants to draft - not necessarily the high profile one or two dimensional players but two way, team players. It will be fun to see who the Knicks draft.

Why Isola plays Captain Obvious in his remark about Melo not being the only resistor is dumbfounding. Does he really believe Phil doesn't know that? Moronic tweet.

I get the impression that Phil does respect Rose. But I also think Rose has an uphill battle to get resigned here and that if he does, it will be on Phil's terms and not Rose's. Chances are that Rose coming off the bench as a two guard might be very effective assuming Rose recovers. OTOH, I wouldn't hold my breath.

Yesterday I found Melo's claim that all he wanted was "to win" as bizarre. Why does he think the teammates he has don't want to win? Or the coaches? Or Phil? Or Dolan?
Melo seems to think he's the only one who wants to win and will hold his breath until the Knicks start winning. "I just want to win." No sh@t.

Yeah, it's all a lot of fun to be able to blame Melo. But the chips will be on the table once he's gone and guys like KP might start paying attention to just how competitive the rebuild is...

Looks like KP is paying attention to Melo right now.

Question is did Phil's performance today make it easier to trade Melo... or harder? Time will tell.

its not about blaming melo dude. Teams dont give a **** what phil says about melo. The reason its tough to trade him is that he is older,expensive,and purely a offensive player on the decline
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

4/14/2017  5:18 PM
crzymdups wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:

Yeah, I'm not sure how I feel about bringing back Rose.

I don't know if we can get a guy like Jrue Holiday, Teague, or George Hill in FA though.


Don't think Phil wants him back...no way.

He is not even a player that moves well without the ball, so if he is an off guard he will still have to do his normal thing.

If Rose had great court vision I'd put up with his defensive deficiencies, but perimeter D is essential.

He said Rose plays well with Noah...I think he brings Rose back so Noah doesn't die on the vine..


I'll go gentleman's bet with you on that.

Think about the contract Rose would want at this point...and after all is said and done he ended the season yet with another leg injury.

Not going to lie...it is amazing how he can take it to the basket at will, and I don't care that he can't shoot well from 3 because his midrange Js are so efficient.

BUT his D is lame- he shows no scrappiness on that end, and you see him missing open looks all the time.

I'll be stunned if Phil offers him the 4y/$100M type contract he will be looking for.

Yeah no one is saying that though. No one will give Rose that money, particularly after his most recent injury. I think it is very fair to say Phil specifically left the door open for a Rose return. I think the circumstances would have to be - the Knicks strike out in FA and Rose doesn't get a good offer from anywhere else, the Knicks may make him a modest offer. I don't know if it's likely. But I could certainly see it happening. Phil definitely left the door open if you watch him talking about Rose.

I think Phil was being diplomatic about bringing Rose back, and we know Rose is signing for less than near max...just ain't happening on his last significant contract negotiation.

But, really, who in the league would give Rose that money? The Kings?? Who else?

I'm saying I think there's a VERY good chance he doesn't get anywhere NEAR that money. If you're an executive and you give Rose 4yr/$100M and he goes down with a knee injury next year, you are fired. He might get some high 1 and 1 offers like 2yr/$50M with the second year a team option.

I'm saying I don't think he'll get a big offer. He might've if he hadn't needed another knee surgery to close out the year. Now? I really really don't see it.

You and I know that we can never say never about the amount of money a team might be willing to pay out to a player they feel is the "answer."

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
fwk00
Posts: 22136
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

4/14/2017  5:19 PM
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
holfresh wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
crzymdups wrote:

Yeah, I'm not sure how I feel about bringing back Rose.

I don't know if we can get a guy like Jrue Holiday, Teague, or George Hill in FA though.


Don't think Phil wants him back...no way.

He is not even a player that moves well without the ball, so if he is an off guard he will still have to do his normal thing.

If Rose had great court vision I'd put up with his defensive deficiencies, but perimeter D is essential.

He said Rose plays well with Noah...I think he brings Rose back so Noah doesn't die on the vine..


I'll go gentleman's bet with you on that.

Think about the contract Rose would want at this point...and after all is said and done he ended the season yet with another leg injury.

Not going to lie...it is amazing how he can take it to the basket at will, and I don't care that he can't shoot well from 3 because his midrange Js are so efficient.

BUT his D is lame- he shows no scrappiness on that end, and you see him missing open looks all the time.

I'll be stunned if Phil offers him the 4y/$100M type contract he will be looking for.

If that is your position then this should concern you...He will be looking for a player to replace Melo..He said he isn't rebuilding like Chicago because they have been doing it since 1999..

He didn't say we wasn't rebuilding like Chicago. What he was saying is that Chicago is a big nmarket and as serious about its basketball as NY and in 20ish years is still looking for the right chemistry. The message being, "It ain't easy."

WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

4/14/2017  5:19 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:Melo has to leave..It's the only way Phil will take responsibility..Dude is delusional..

Presidents never take responsibility when things go wrong. They just shift to new excuses and give a new spin on reality.

Or drop bombs...?

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
Phil's press conference

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy