fitzfarm wrote:Remove melo and rose and this team plays defense and passes to the open man...
After Jackson and Melo are both gone, whenever that happen, five to seven years. It would take five to seven years to truly turn things around for this franchise for the better. The longer Jackson stays, the more likely he will sign another bad Noah like deal. Jackson will be gone in two years, but the legacy of the bad contracts he's giving out will extend beyond that.
The Knicks are better off than they were with Zeke ( But is that really that hard to do? Is it saying all that much?) But they aren't better off to where they could be if they just kept to the basic NBA rebuild blueprint ( there is literally no other sport with such a defined roadmap to an early team rebuild than the NBA, the script literally writes itself for you when you are rock bottom)
One of the things I appreciate most about Daryl Morey and Sam Hinkie were that they were super open about the idea of margin of error. In order for the Knicks to outstrip Melo and Jackson, they need close to zero margin of error for an extended period of time. This is not practical nor reasonable to expect. Even good teams, you are going to miss on some picks. You are going to miss on some decisions. But you need the asset base to have more opportunities to keep trying to find "hits" over misses.
IF you just look at two young players, the future for the Knicks seems brighter.
If you look at the franchise from a purely resource management perspective, given the current NBA marketplace, there are more questions than answers abound.
To "rebuild", you need everyone on the same page. That won't happen until both Jackson and Melo are gone, and that might not happen for two more years.