[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Trade with Boston for 1# pick
Author Thread
TheGame
Posts: 26651
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
4/6/2017  9:52 AM
We should offer Boston our pick and Melo and Willy for Kelly Olynyk, Terry Rozier, and the Net's pick (assuming it is top-2). We can then draft Josh Jackson, and then try to sign a guy like Teague. Olynyk would probably fit better next to KP, who we can move full-time to the center position. Terry Rozier would compete for our starting PG position. Boston still gets a top-10 pick and Melo and Willy. We get rid of Melo, add young prospects in Olynyk, Rozier, and Josh Jackson who will help solve our defensive problems at SF/PF as well as score.
Trust the Process
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 72095
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/6/2017  10:01 AM
"We Should".........
I wonder what Boston thinks of the trade?
What does Boston do with Isiah Thomas? He is a free agent and due a pay raise. He is also really small.
Ainge might not want to pay him a max type deal or lose him for nothing. Its a problem, but a good one.
They can actually let him walk and it opens up a bit of cap space. Perhaps a much smaller deal for Melo as they can just fit him on their cap space via trade.
They can draft whom they want, have melo, and keep Olynk.
Say trade us Jae Crowder. It upgrades there 3 short term. Maybe they draft Jackson and develop him behind Melo for two years.
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

4/6/2017  10:04 AM
TheGame wrote:We should offer Boston our pick and Melo and Willy for Kelly Olynyk, Terry Rozier, and the Net's pick (assuming it is top-2). We can then draft Josh Jackson, and then try to sign a guy like Teague. Olynyk would probably fit better next to KP, who we can move full-time to the center position. Terry Rozier would compete for our starting PG position. Boston still gets a top-10 pick and Melo and Willy. We get rid of Melo, add young prospects in Olynyk, Rozier, and Josh Jackson who will help solve our defensive problems at SF/PF as well as score.

KP will not be a good full time center. He should play the 4 on offense. If Olynyk can defend 4s better than Billy and also score and rebound like Billy then it would be an upgrade.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
4/6/2017  10:53 AM
Boston is happy where they are and probably don't want to mess things up.
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
4/6/2017  11:18 AM
what would ALL of the Boston Celtics picks in this upcoming draft worth and what could it land them?
What about the next 2 years?

what about a package deal for CA and Porzinges along with others on both sides?
What if Noah was also packaged in the deal?

MaTT4281
Posts: 35159
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
4/6/2017  12:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/6/2017  12:28 PM
RonRon wrote:what would ALL of the Boston Celtics picks in this upcoming draft worth and what could it land them?
What about the next 2 years?

what about a package deal for CA and Porzinges along with others on both sides?
What if Noah was also packaged in the deal?

Maybe if we're lucky, one of those picks will pan out and get us someone close to Porzingis level potential...

Nalod
Posts: 72095
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/6/2017  12:34 PM
This is a good draft, but its not like there is a clear cut franchise player above all.
Not like two years ago, you had Townes. KP went 4th, I think some might reset that where KP is 2nd.
Thus, picks 1-6 might not be much difference going in. In a few years in hindsight will tell us what we want to know.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40252
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

4/6/2017  1:03 PM
Nalod wrote:This is a good draft, but its not like there is a clear cut franchise player above all.
Not like two years ago, you had Townes. KP went 4th, I think some might reset that where KP is 2nd.
Thus, picks 1-6 might not be much difference going in. In a few years in hindsight will tell us what we want to know.

This. I mean, Jackson and Tatum are so close right now I would say there's no point, other than getting rid of Melo. But I'm not sure I want to get rid of Melo enough to throw in Willy. I might consider it more if Boston threw in Smart.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Kemet
Posts: 22087
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/23/2015
Member: #6148

4/6/2017  1:05 PM
Knicks have nothing to offer Boston for the Nets pick !!!
NardDogNation
Posts: 27670
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

4/6/2017  4:54 PM
I think that the trade as proposed is overkill on our part but wouldn't mind Melo and our pick for their pick if it's 1st overall. If that were on the table, I'd take it in a heartbeat. It'd be even better if we could expand the deal to include the Kings and then re-route that 1st pick overall to SAC for their two lottery picks.
Trade with Boston for 1# pick

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy