CrushAlot wrote: Did the nba need the Cavs to be good after LBJ?
Driving Donald Sterling out, for things he clearly was for 20 years as an owner, so they could sell the franchise for 2 billion to Steve Balmer - All NBA franchises valuations go up. Owners are happy, the value of the franchises go up and really all it cost them was an owner they didn't like anyway.
LBJ leaving Cleveland, humiliating the entire town in the process on the way out, right before a massive labor war was about to break out. Clear message - If you aren't a "big market" then you are just the Washington Nationals, you are a farm team to be gutted for the bigger market teams and you have ZERO chance to win. No investor group, who could pick from NFL or MLB or NBA teams to buy, will prefer the NBA teams. Big market ones aren't going to be sold, small market ones that do well are doomed to lose and never contend. Cavs became a poster child for what would happen to your small market NBA team, thus rigging of multiple drafts to rebuild them and the Mavs winning right after a major labor war, just like the Pistons winning in a team format without a super star, right after a major labor war.
Stern's NBA operates off of "The Narrative" Who gives the most marketable storyline? That's who wins. Does the best singer win American Idol? Or the best balance of a passable voice, good looks and sex appeal, with a nice backstory like living in the back of a van.
If Oprah Winfrey had an adult age daughter and Melo married her, the Knicks would win an NBA championship. Pure and simple.
Should tell you something that the Warriors won a chip, and did it with true team ball but the marketing narrative was how awesome LBJ was the entire time.
If Dolan sold the franchise to Oprah, the Knicks would win a championship in three years.