BRIGGS wrote:We should just take future picks even if it's 4-6 years from now-- it will be in the bank. I think it's going to be too much to picks for this year. Cap space and future picks. That's fine
NBA teams rarely trade that far into the projectible future. NBA draft and trade history tends to confirm this. Sometimes you see trades of assets three years down the line, but it's the exception rather than the rule and it tends to be a conversion option ( i.e. a conditional first rounder that doesn't vest in X number of years becomes two 2nd rounds in Y year in the future)
NBA rookies were held to specific standards until the 2020-2021 season. This is why "cost certainty" was so huge for many teams even as the previous labor war raged. Veterans would move to different standards but the expectations on rookie contracts and rookie slotting was fixed. No team will trade into it's draft future when it's unclear what the CBA parameters would be. 4-6 years is FOREVER in sports timelines.
Nothing will help trade Melo
- He has a NTC
- He clearly can dictate many of the terms of what remains and what comes back in a trade
- His desire for "branding" limits the teams he will have his NTC for, to maybe 1-2 teams
- There are very few salary cap fits for his large contract factoring in the above issues
- The 15 percent trade kicker makes it even more difficult
- He's a no defense ball stopping shot jacker who doesn't play team basketball, he has low positional value as a PF. He is a talented isolation scorer, but his functional utility to a team, even a contender, has to be a very very specific fit ( how many teams can defend 4 on 5 consistently to hide Melo's defensive indifference? "Indifference" is a polite way to say he just doesn't give a sh!t about defense )
Nothing helps trade Melo EXCEPT the trade deadline itself. A team like the Clippers have a very small window to maximize their current roster, they have a new owner who spent big cash on that team, there's a lot of pressure to win now, these are factors that a difference, but operate as ZERO LEVERAGE. The Knicks have no trade leverage here, which is the purpose of the NTC in the first place.
You cannot create trade leverage. It exists or does not exist given the current NBA marketplace factoring in the current conditions of the league and positional value and scarcity. Danny Green didn't get a nice fat contract because he's so awesome, he did so because it was a myriad of factors dealing with the marketplace and the conditions of his abilities and projections.
The posters here trying to fabricate trade leverage are just spinning their wheels. Teams will give the bare minimum that they have to, to get Melo in a trade. That's it. That's all the Knicks will get, the best option out of all the poor to mediocre options of the most lowball offers possible. This is what happens when you don't have trade leverage. None of this is personal, it's simply the function of the marketplace environment.