ChuckBuck wrote:Welpee wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:mreinman wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:mreinman wrote:
pushing your girl really hard to have your nasty boys included in itself (to me) is a transgression.
Well, just asking for something aint never hurt nobody. She was free to refuse and dump him if his requests became too uncomfortable.
actually, we don't know if she was "free" to refuse.
Apart from the night in question and even then, only if she indeed was incapacitated, she was always free to refuse. What makes you think otherwise?
The text messages, there's a precedent. Every single time Rose had proposed Group Sex, she had blatantly turned him down. Every. Single. Time. It was only the Night of that she wanted him over, just Rose, not the 2 other dudes. Look at the reports and articles, she was sleeping already and had puked and passed out, Rose tried calling her, no answer. Rose friend tried texting/calling, no answer. They made their way into the bedroom, and that's when the disgusting act led by Rose happened.
And yet she contacted Rose hours afterwards and doesn't mention anything about it?
They were in a on again/off again relationship. She wanted clarity from someone she thought she could trust after 2 years.
Apparently, not.
"They already have very traditional cultural expectations of me," she said.
The woman hopes that by winning her case and maintaining her anonymity, she can empower other women.
"I want to share my story so women can know that they are able to come forward and remain anonymous and not to have to have the burden or the worry that their loved ones will find out," she said.
And she was so horrified by what happened that it took her TWO WHOLE YEARS to file a police report. AFTER she filed her lawsuit. AFTER it was confirmed she wasn't getting paid by Rose to be quiet. Which is why it's not a criminal case. And she wants other women to be empowered by the fact she's suing for $21 million dollars, anonymously. So it's been TWO YEARS and her family has no idea she was on again off again with Derek Rose?
And people who pride themselves on high IQ, discriminating realism and their own professionalism are buying into this.
Again, is Rose to be admired for this? No, not at all. Should he have to bear the damage to his endorsements, his credibility? Sure enough. But we lived through the derangement that was JR Smith. And that episode included a lot heavier baggage than this. Unless you happen to think unsubstantiated rape is worse than negligence that ends in death.
Rose is being sued two years later based on heresay. By a law student. Interesting.
Double standard, indeed.