[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Where the heck is Hillary Clinton?
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/2/2016  4:33 PM
As I said earlier the problem that Trump has is that Hillary has a HUGE base in the SouthEast due to the fact that the former Slave States are still where the majority of African Americans are and his inability to reach out to them early was a big mistake as it was for Bernie. This is why there were always racial problems in the south. After the Civil War the Black percentage of the population was huge and it was feared that if they had the right to vote they would change the political power structure in the south and for a time this did happen and it freaked the White Power structure out, so they created the Ku Klux Klan, Red Shirts and other white terrorist groups that used violence to suppress the Black Vote and they are STILL suppressing the Black Vote today but with laws instead of violence, for the same reasons.

AUTOADVERT
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

9/2/2016  4:37 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/2/2016  4:41 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:
Nalod wrote:"no thank you" is a cop out!!!!

Supreme court justices, likely two hangs in the balance. That does filter down to our every day lives.
The court on Wednesday split on N.C. discriminatory actions to limit minority voting. If Scalia was alive, it would likey have stood.
Few things scare me more than the far swing to the right.

Yes, Hilary has made a money grab. Get in line.
Where was all this outrage when the Bush Family was raking in the cash?
This all about a women doing things men have been doing for decades and we want some sweet grandma "Barbara Bush" type women?
Think Bengazi is the first embassy we ever lost? Far from it. Its the first that we went on a bipartisan witch hunt on.
Im not a raving Hilary lover but if she is "crooked" then Trump is 10x worse!

BTW, he lost me when he slammed John McCain and called him a "Loser" for getting captured in war. Most disgusting think I ever heard a candidate every say!
When some disillusioned Purple heart recipient gave his metal to Trump he said "Cool, I always wanted one of these"!!! That is wrong as so many levels.
Trump is the guy that got out of Vietnam by a sham docter letter. That's ok, but don't take another mans metal!!!
This guy is rotten to the core.
Made fun of a disfigured reporter? He looked like a dumb teenager in need of maturity! Not a 70 year old man of "substance".
Bans reporters from papers with a history of fact checking?

Obama was gonna take your guns. Didn't happen. Obama was gonna take the Ammo. Prices went up. Gun dudes fall for this crap all the time. president can't take away a constitutional amendment.
ChickenSHyt NRA pansies now blasting that rhetoric? How many times we going to get taken by that lobby?


Nothing Hilary has done even comes close to what this guy is about!
No doubt its a Shyt Show but a 25billion dollar wall cheered by ignorant white uneducated gun lovers who fall for fear mongering crap over and over is validation enough for me that I can't vote for trump and if you don't vote for Hilary you might end up with him!

Stand up and vote for the democracy. This country has never been perfect but we cannot succumb to fearful ignorance and a right wing agenda that moves us away from the beacon of light that is our constitution!!!!!
We are a country of compassion and justice, not "America First".

"No, Thank you" might be a cop out. Particularly, since I know that a Plurality is good enough to win. So, maybe I vote Johnson (a little better than "meatball") as he has real ideas, but no chance to win. As far as I am concerned, he just deserves a spot in the debates. Not likely to happen as they change the measure by which he gets included.

You can say "vote for democracy", but don't those words ring hollow given what we saw regarding the establishment forcing our hands in the DNC? Bernie never had a chance.

Neither does Johnson.

Do we?


Yeah that's true and it stinks. If the establishment had been pushing for Bernie as hard as they did for Hillary, he would be the nominee right now. I wish Joe Biden had run. He'd probably be up by 15 points in the polls over Trump.

I'm far from a Clinton supporter...This is an important election given the Sumpreme Court..So Hilary over Trump any day of the week and twice on Sunday..Bernie lost me because none of his proposals were possible..He never said how he would pay for them...So if he was peddling 4 mega spending projects without any possible way of paying for it, then what was he really going to do as President??


He didn't really propose anything that other less wealthy countries haven't been able to do though.

Well yeah..Those countries impose 60/70% taxes on their citizens and spend less than a twentieth? on their military which will never happen in this country...Also pulling back from global trade isn't realistic..Globalism is here to stay and finding ways to adjust is where we need to go...

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/2/2016  4:54 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:She never gives interviews--she has no policies. Its come to the point that her game plan is to bash Trump--thats it. Trump is right--exactly what has a democratic President done for African American or Hispanic sin the last 20 years---nothing. If African American blindly vote for Clinton because they are following others they are simply following the same path. If the same path dont complain about the outcome. I think Trump is such a narcissist that he wants to be known as someone who did a good job. This is the time AA and Hispanic leaders should go talk with Trump--because I think the guy will cut deals with minorities to help them and expand the job base. Despite some stupid rhetoric--I think he wanst to do a good job for everyone and its up to some of our minorities over the next 2 months to really think--do I want more of the same or WORSE--or maybe should we try a guy who will sincerely try to help us? Educated wealthy whites dont like Trump--they like status quo--wealthy educated whites who control the media and many jobs--those are the people who right now hold the election in their hands UNLESS minorities stop and think. If African Americans and His panics change their thought process and they have time--I think this guy will do much better for them. And we want to see improvement in the uS--not just for wealthy whites.

Briggs, Trump has openly courted white nationalists, they are making robocalls for him. Trump's deals almost always work great for Trump and lousy for everyone else. Trump vs. Clinton should be called "Election 2016, Pick your Poison."

Real talk: If you ask me to choose between the candidate that mainstream black leaders are rallying behind, or the candidate that fringe white nationalists are rallying behind... come on, son. What you think I'm gonna do?

Now I won't call Trump a racist but he plays footsie with racists, he plays footsie with birthers. A true believer maybe not, but any American his age who pretends he doesn't know what David Duke is about is either an idiot or a liar. Charleston was a year ago... it's a disgrace. He's in our corner?

I dont blame you under the circumstances. I do reject the notion that Hillary is a safer bet for this country. Different set of problems.

+1

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/2/2016  4:55 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:
Nalod wrote:"no thank you" is a cop out!!!!

Supreme court justices, likely two hangs in the balance. That does filter down to our every day lives.
The court on Wednesday split on N.C. discriminatory actions to limit minority voting. If Scalia was alive, it would likey have stood.
Few things scare me more than the far swing to the right.

Yes, Hilary has made a money grab. Get in line.
Where was all this outrage when the Bush Family was raking in the cash?
This all about a women doing things men have been doing for decades and we want some sweet grandma "Barbara Bush" type women?
Think Bengazi is the first embassy we ever lost? Far from it. Its the first that we went on a bipartisan witch hunt on.
Im not a raving Hilary lover but if she is "crooked" then Trump is 10x worse!

BTW, he lost me when he slammed John McCain and called him a "Loser" for getting captured in war. Most disgusting think I ever heard a candidate every say!
When some disillusioned Purple heart recipient gave his metal to Trump he said "Cool, I always wanted one of these"!!! That is wrong as so many levels.
Trump is the guy that got out of Vietnam by a sham docter letter. That's ok, but don't take another mans metal!!!
This guy is rotten to the core.
Made fun of a disfigured reporter? He looked like a dumb teenager in need of maturity! Not a 70 year old man of "substance".
Bans reporters from papers with a history of fact checking?

Obama was gonna take your guns. Didn't happen. Obama was gonna take the Ammo. Prices went up. Gun dudes fall for this crap all the time. president can't take away a constitutional amendment.
ChickenSHyt NRA pansies now blasting that rhetoric? How many times we going to get taken by that lobby?


Nothing Hilary has done even comes close to what this guy is about!
No doubt its a Shyt Show but a 25billion dollar wall cheered by ignorant white uneducated gun lovers who fall for fear mongering crap over and over is validation enough for me that I can't vote for trump and if you don't vote for Hilary you might end up with him!

Stand up and vote for the democracy. This country has never been perfect but we cannot succumb to fearful ignorance and a right wing agenda that moves us away from the beacon of light that is our constitution!!!!!
We are a country of compassion and justice, not "America First".

"No, Thank you" might be a cop out. Particularly, since I know that a Plurality is good enough to win. So, maybe I vote Johnson (a little better than "meatball") as he has real ideas, but no chance to win. As far as I am concerned, he just deserves a spot in the debates. Not likely to happen as they change the measure by which he gets included.

You can say "vote for democracy", but don't those words ring hollow given what we saw regarding the establishment forcing our hands in the DNC? Bernie never had a chance.

Neither does Johnson.

Do we?

+2

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/2/2016  4:57 PM
nixluva wrote:As I said earlier the problem that Trump has is that Hillary has a HUGE base in the SouthEast due to the fact that the former Slave States are still where the majority of African Americans are and his inability to reach out to them early was a big mistake as it was for Bernie. This is why there were always racial problems in the south. After the Civil War the Black percentage of the population was huge and it was feared that if they had the right to vote they would change the political power structure in the south and for a time this did happen and it freaked the White Power structure out, so they created the Ku Klux Klan, Red Shirts and other white terrorist groups that used violence to suppress the Black Vote and they are STILL suppressing the Black Vote today but with laws instead of violence, for the same reasons.

After the Ratification of the 15th Amendment in 1870 gave Black Men the right to Vote, real progress was being made. This is what caused the White Backlash in the South after the Civil War:

This is why Republicans are willing to put up with Trump. They want to have the ability to pick the Supreme Court Justices and protect their racist Voter ID laws, so they can maintain control of the South as they have for Hundreds of years, with the brief exception of 1870's.

DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

9/2/2016  5:19 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Hillary will win as did Obama. Republicans will continue to lose to modern era Democrats/socialists which make up most of America will continue to push racism as our #1 problem in America. The comments here are a microcosm of today's society. Hillary is supposedly less racist therefore she should win. The hell with anything else

Nice try buddy. I didn't say anything about race for a while. I started by correcting the nonsense about Obama and Clinton having no policies. His employment practices, that meeting in Mexico... but then you guys are just telling each other how awesome he's gonna do in the debates and how it's in the bag. Now she's gonna win? You are all over the place too.

The David Duke thing is as much an example of his dishonesty than anything else. Countered everything you and BRIGGS were saying point by point with logic and reason. And how many "I don't like Hillary"s do you need? There is a lot of agreement here. But fess up for being wrong once in a while. Strength, not weakness.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/2/2016  5:30 PM
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:I wasn't happy with how Trump changed his to e again when speaking to supporters. Either he is purposely trying to rile up his supporters thinking there is enough of them who will vote him in or he's still not seeing the full picture. It was getting harder for me to defend his more recent actions but I really liked how his new campaign manager reeled him in and got him back on message. Right before he canned Maniford I was saying Trump needs to stop getting sidetracked and ease up with the unnecessary rhetoric that Has done him no good. In fact lead to him falling 10pts behind Hillary in he polls. He closed within 2pts as of last night but I'm sure his deficit increased some after last nights speech. His new campaign manager seemed to get brought to him that I order to win he needs to use more unifying language and policies. He was sounding as Presidential as ever for a past few weeks. He meeting with the President of Mexico went well and then he got sidetracked again late last night

If two people have a meeting, and come away from it with two wildly different accounts on what was even discussed — i.e. Mexico paying for a big, beautiful wall on our southern border — how is that an example of a meeting that went well?

There is no way for us to know what actually was said in that off-the-record meeting, so how can you say it went well?

Same way we don't know what Trump is hiding financially, because he won't release any of his tax returns. This is unprecedented behavior from a major party candidate since Watergate. Only 3rd party Perot in '92 didn't do this.

But I guess once you become a billionaire you don't have to worry about accountability and transparency, right? Anyone vigilant about Hillary's obscurantism but is so easily able to give Trump a pass on his is being a hypocrite.

Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people. As the Mexican President is probably wondering and as the thread asks Where's Hillary?

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/2/2016  5:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/2/2016  5:32 PM
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Hillary will win as did Obama. Republicans will continue to lose to modern era Democrats/socialists which make up most of America will continue to push racism as our #1 problem in America. The comments here are a microcosm of today's society. Hillary is supposedly less racist therefore she should win. The hell with anything else

Nice try buddy. I didn't say anything about race for a while. I started by correcting the nonsense about Obama and Clinton having no policies. His employment practices, that meeting in Mexico... but then you guys are just telling each other how awesome he's gonna do in the debates and how it's in the bag. Now she's gonna win? You are all over the place too.

The David Duke thing is as much an example of his dishonesty than anything else. Countered everything you and BRIGGS were saying point by point with logic and reason. And how many "I don't like Hillary"s do you need? There is a lot of agreement here. But fess up for being wrong once in a while. Strength, not weakness.


IMO I bring Race into it because there is no way to get around the TRUTH. I show proof of how things really are. It's not about any individual being racist. It's about a SYSTEM that was intentionally built to be Racist from it's inception. There were those who knew it wasn't right but they gave in to the wishes of those who wanted to maintain an unjust system. My forefather was dragged here on the Slave Ship Betsey in 1758 and sold by Henry Laurens of South Carolina, who became the president of the Continental Congress in 1777. He became rich mostly from the sale of slaves as well as what those slaves produced. The U.S. became rich and powerful based largely on the profits from Slavery. There's not an institution at the founding of this country that isn't in some way tied to this. Then you have the Native Americans and Mexicans who were also dealt with horribly at the founding of this country as well. So no you can't take race out of the discussion.
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

9/2/2016  5:36 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:I wasn't happy with how Trump changed his to e again when speaking to supporters. Either he is purposely trying to rile up his supporters thinking there is enough of them who will vote him in or he's still not seeing the full picture. It was getting harder for me to defend his more recent actions but I really liked how his new campaign manager reeled him in and got him back on message. Right before he canned Maniford I was saying Trump needs to stop getting sidetracked and ease up with the unnecessary rhetoric that Has done him no good. In fact lead to him falling 10pts behind Hillary in he polls. He closed within 2pts as of last night but I'm sure his deficit increased some after last nights speech. His new campaign manager seemed to get brought to him that I order to win he needs to use more unifying language and policies. He was sounding as Presidential as ever for a past few weeks. He meeting with the President of Mexico went well and then he got sidetracked again late last night

If two people have a meeting, and come away from it with two wildly different accounts on what was even discussed — i.e. Mexico paying for a big, beautiful wall on our southern border — how is that an example of a meeting that went well?

There is no way for us to know what actually was said in that off-the-record meeting, so how can you say it went well?

Same way we don't know what Trump is hiding financially, because he won't release any of his tax returns. This is unprecedented behavior from a major party candidate since Watergate. Only 3rd party Perot in '92 didn't do this.

But I guess once you become a billionaire you don't have to worry about accountability and transparency, right? Anyone vigilant about Hillary's obscurantism but is so easily able to give Trump a pass on his is being a hypocrite.

Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people. As the Mexican President is probably wondering and as the thread asks Where's Hillary?

Hillary is busy raising record amounts of money I guess, and gearing up for the race in earnest after the holidays. I wish she had said: you know what? Bernie's movement inspired me and I'm gonna forgo big money donations and do what he did relying on individuals. But that isn't who she is. It's sad, she could've taken a high road and gotten more good will.

But now you say something silly again: that Trump's lame meeting did anything more for Mexico than a sitting president has in 8 years. Bull****. Show me this is true or just stop it. You aren't convincing anyone with outlandish lies.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

9/2/2016  5:36 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That's really putting yourself out there, policy wise.

Did he come out in favor of puppies and hugs too?

DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

9/2/2016  5:43 PM
nixluva wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Hillary will win as did Obama. Republicans will continue to lose to modern era Democrats/socialists which make up most of America will continue to push racism as our #1 problem in America. The comments here are a microcosm of today's society. Hillary is supposedly less racist therefore she should win. The hell with anything else

Nice try buddy. I didn't say anything about race for a while. I started by correcting the nonsense about Obama and Clinton having no policies. His employment practices, that meeting in Mexico... but then you guys are just telling each other how awesome he's gonna do in the debates and how it's in the bag. Now she's gonna win? You are all over the place too.

The David Duke thing is as much an example of his dishonesty than anything else. Countered everything you and BRIGGS were saying point by point with logic and reason. And how many "I don't like Hillary"s do you need? There is a lot of agreement here. But fess up for being wrong once in a while. Strength, not weakness.


IMO I bring Race into it because there is no way to get around the TRUTH. I show proof of how things really are. It's not about any individual being racist. It's about a SYSTEM that was intentionally built to be Racist from it's inception. There were those who knew it wasn't right but they gave in to the wishes of those who wanted to maintain an unjust system. My forefather was dragged here on the Slave Ship Betsey in 1758 and sold by Henry Laurens of South Carolina, who became the president of the Continental Congress in 1777. He became rich mostly from the sale of slaves as well as what those slaves produced. The U.S. became rich and powerful based largely on the profits from Slavery. There's not an institution at the founding of this country that isn't in some way tied to this. Then you have the Native Americans and Mexicans who were also dealt with horribly at the founding of this country as well. So no you can't take race out of the discussion.

I hear you, and the thread was explicitly asking why blacks and Latinos aren't breaking their backs to hear this guy. I'm just trying to keep the focus specifically on the candidates versus the history of racism in America so we don't get too into the weeds. I acknowledge your perspective but was trying to see if there was a focused way to discuss this that only goes back 25 years instead of 225. But guess it's just a waste of time.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

9/2/2016  6:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/2/2016  6:10 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:I wasn't happy with how Trump changed his to e again when speaking to supporters. Either he is purposely trying to rile up his supporters thinking there is enough of them who will vote him in or he's still not seeing the full picture. It was getting harder for me to defend his more recent actions but I really liked how his new campaign manager reeled him in and got him back on message. Right before he canned Maniford I was saying Trump needs to stop getting sidetracked and ease up with the unnecessary rhetoric that Has done him no good. In fact lead to him falling 10pts behind Hillary in he polls. He closed within 2pts as of last night but I'm sure his deficit increased some after last nights speech. His new campaign manager seemed to get brought to him that I order to win he needs to use more unifying language and policies. He was sounding as Presidential as ever for a past few weeks. He meeting with the President of Mexico went well and then he got sidetracked again late last night

If two people have a meeting, and come away from it with two wildly different accounts on what was even discussed — i.e. Mexico paying for a big, beautiful wall on our southern border — how is that an example of a meeting that went well?

There is no way for us to know what actually was said in that off-the-record meeting, so how can you say it went well?

Same way we don't know what Trump is hiding financially, because he won't release any of his tax returns. This is unprecedented behavior from a major party candidate since Watergate. Only 3rd party Perot in '92 didn't do this.

But I guess once you become a billionaire you don't have to worry about accountability and transparency, right? Anyone vigilant about Hillary's obscurantism but is so easily able to give Trump a pass on his is being a hypocrite.

Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people. As the Mexican President is probably wondering and as the thread asks Where's Hillary?


Here they are at the White house on Aug. 16,2016..You can google the press conference to see what Obama has done with Mexico compared to Trump...As far as doing stuff for the Mexican people, remember NAFTA and who was in the White House??I do realize this isn't an exercise exploring the facts, I just thought I would offer..I know America yearn for the dog and pony optics...
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/2/2016  6:23 PM
holfresh wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:I wasn't happy with how Trump changed his to e again when speaking to supporters. Either he is purposely trying to rile up his supporters thinking there is enough of them who will vote him in or he's still not seeing the full picture. It was getting harder for me to defend his more recent actions but I really liked how his new campaign manager reeled him in and got him back on message. Right before he canned Maniford I was saying Trump needs to stop getting sidetracked and ease up with the unnecessary rhetoric that Has done him no good. In fact lead to him falling 10pts behind Hillary in he polls. He closed within 2pts as of last night but I'm sure his deficit increased some after last nights speech. His new campaign manager seemed to get brought to him that I order to win he needs to use more unifying language and policies. He was sounding as Presidential as ever for a past few weeks. He meeting with the President of Mexico went well and then he got sidetracked again late last night

If two people have a meeting, and come away from it with two wildly different accounts on what was even discussed — i.e. Mexico paying for a big, beautiful wall on our southern border — how is that an example of a meeting that went well?

There is no way for us to know what actually was said in that off-the-record meeting, so how can you say it went well?

Same way we don't know what Trump is hiding financially, because he won't release any of his tax returns. This is unprecedented behavior from a major party candidate since Watergate. Only 3rd party Perot in '92 didn't do this.

But I guess once you become a billionaire you don't have to worry about accountability and transparency, right? Anyone vigilant about Hillary's obscurantism but is so easily able to give Trump a pass on his is being a hypocrite.

Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people. As the Mexican President is probably wondering and as the thread asks Where's Hillary?


Here they are at the White house on Aug. 16,2016..You can google the press conference to see what Obama has done with Mexico compared to Trump...As far as doing stuff for the Mexican people, remember NAFTA and who was in the White House??I do realize this isn't an exercise exploring the facts, I just thought I would offer..I know America yearn for the dog and pony optics...

Some people live in the FOX, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck or Breitbart alternate reality bubble.

DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

9/2/2016  6:27 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/2/2016  7:01 PM
holfresh wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:I wasn't happy with how Trump changed his to e again when speaking to supporters. Either he is purposely trying to rile up his supporters thinking there is enough of them who will vote him in or he's still not seeing the full picture. It was getting harder for me to defend his more recent actions but I really liked how his new campaign manager reeled him in and got him back on message. Right before he canned Maniford I was saying Trump needs to stop getting sidetracked and ease up with the unnecessary rhetoric that Has done him no good. In fact lead to him falling 10pts behind Hillary in he polls. He closed within 2pts as of last night but I'm sure his deficit increased some after last nights speech. His new campaign manager seemed to get brought to him that I order to win he needs to use more unifying language and policies. He was sounding as Presidential as ever for a past few weeks. He meeting with the President of Mexico went well and then he got sidetracked again late last night

If two people have a meeting, and come away from it with two wildly different accounts on what was even discussed — i.e. Mexico paying for a big, beautiful wall on our southern border — how is that an example of a meeting that went well?

There is no way for us to know what actually was said in that off-the-record meeting, so how can you say it went well?

Same way we don't know what Trump is hiding financially, because he won't release any of his tax returns. This is unprecedented behavior from a major party candidate since Watergate. Only 3rd party Perot in '92 didn't do this.

But I guess once you become a billionaire you don't have to worry about accountability and transparency, right? Anyone vigilant about Hillary's obscurantism but is so easily able to give Trump a pass on his is being a hypocrite.

Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people. As the Mexican President is probably wondering and as the thread asks Where's Hillary?


Here they are at the White house on Aug. 16,2016..You can google the press conference to see what Obama has done with Mexico compared to Trump...As far as doing stuff for the Mexican people, remember NAFTA and who was in the White House??I do realize this isn't an exercise exploring the facts, I just thought I would offer..I know America yearn for the dog and pony optics...

And that took holfresh a whole 5 minutes to find I bet. Thanks for doing guns' homework! And actually I think that meeting pictured was in Mexico in 2014.

Hillary has done more for Mexico via her (problematic) foundation than anything Trump has.

But let's keep saying "Obama and Hillary have done nothing" guns and keep our head in the sand.

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/2/2016  6:40 PM
DrAlphaeus wrote:
nixluva wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Hillary will win as did Obama. Republicans will continue to lose to modern era Democrats/socialists which make up most of America will continue to push racism as our #1 problem in America. The comments here are a microcosm of today's society. Hillary is supposedly less racist therefore she should win. The hell with anything else

Nice try buddy. I didn't say anything about race for a while. I started by correcting the nonsense about Obama and Clinton having no policies. His employment practices, that meeting in Mexico... but then you guys are just telling each other how awesome he's gonna do in the debates and how it's in the bag. Now she's gonna win? You are all over the place too.

The David Duke thing is as much an example of his dishonesty than anything else. Countered everything you and BRIGGS were saying point by point with logic and reason. And how many "I don't like Hillary"s do you need? There is a lot of agreement here. But fess up for being wrong once in a while. Strength, not weakness.


IMO I bring Race into it because there is no way to get around the TRUTH. I show proof of how things really are. It's not about any individual being racist. It's about a SYSTEM that was intentionally built to be Racist from it's inception. There were those who knew it wasn't right but they gave in to the wishes of those who wanted to maintain an unjust system. My forefather was dragged here on the Slave Ship Betsey in 1758 and sold by Henry Laurens of South Carolina, who became the president of the Continental Congress in 1777. He became rich mostly from the sale of slaves as well as what those slaves produced. The U.S. became rich and powerful based largely on the profits from Slavery. There's not an institution at the founding of this country that isn't in some way tied to this. Then you have the Native Americans and Mexicans who were also dealt with horribly at the founding of this country as well. So no you can't take race out of the discussion.

I hear you, and the thread was explicitly asking why blacks and Latinos aren't breaking their backs to hear this guy. I'm just trying to keep the focus specifically on the candidates versus the history of racism in America so we don't get too into the weeds. I acknowledge your perspective but was trying to see if there was a focused way to discuss this that only goes back 25 years instead of 225. But guess it's just a waste of time.


I understand your perspective. I just come at this from a very long lense view. My Grandmother who is still alive at 94. My father who is 70. And a bunch of other older relatives keep the past alive in me. It's not such a long time ago when you talk with people who were alive for much of the darker days of American History. If my older relatives are still alive then you know the racist people from that era are also still alive. That's a big part of the problem. Each passing down history and attitudes. Down here in the South that oppressive power structure is fighting to stay in power and keep the status quo. That's who Trump and much of the Republican party represent.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/2/2016  7:19 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/2/2016  7:21 PM
DrAlphaeus wrote:
holfresh wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:I wasn't happy with how Trump changed his to e again when speaking to supporters. Either he is purposely trying to rile up his supporters thinking there is enough of them who will vote him in or he's still not seeing the full picture. It was getting harder for me to defend his more recent actions but I really liked how his new campaign manager reeled him in and got him back on message. Right before he canned Maniford I was saying Trump needs to stop getting sidetracked and ease up with the unnecessary rhetoric that Has done him no good. In fact lead to him falling 10pts behind Hillary in he polls. He closed within 2pts as of last night but I'm sure his deficit increased some after last nights speech. His new campaign manager seemed to get brought to him that I order to win he needs to use more unifying language and policies. He was sounding as Presidential as ever for a past few weeks. He meeting with the President of Mexico went well and then he got sidetracked again late last night

If two people have a meeting, and come away from it with two wildly different accounts on what was even discussed — i.e. Mexico paying for a big, beautiful wall on our southern border — how is that an example of a meeting that went well?

There is no way for us to know what actually was said in that off-the-record meeting, so how can you say it went well?

Same way we don't know what Trump is hiding financially, because he won't release any of his tax returns. This is unprecedented behavior from a major party candidate since Watergate. Only 3rd party Perot in '92 didn't do this.

But I guess once you become a billionaire you don't have to worry about accountability and transparency, right? Anyone vigilant about Hillary's obscurantism but is so easily able to give Trump a pass on his is being a hypocrite.

Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people. As the Mexican President is probably wondering and as the thread asks Where's Hillary?


Here they are at the White house on Aug. 16,2016..You can google the press conference to see what Obama has done with Mexico compared to Trump...As far as doing stuff for the Mexican people, remember NAFTA and who was in the White House??I do realize this isn't an exercise exploring the facts, I just thought I would offer..I know America yearn for the dog and pony optics...

And that took holfresh a whole 5 minutes to find I bet. Thanks for doing guns' homework! And actually I think that meeting pictured was in Mexico in 2014.

Hillary has done more for Mexico via her (problematic) foundation than anything Trump has.

But let's keep saying "Obama and Hillary have done nothing" guns and keep our head in the sand.

And what did that meeting accomplish other than more terrible trade deals for us? Cute picture though

GustavBahler
Posts: 41138
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

9/2/2016  7:21 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
Nalod wrote:"no thank you" is a cop out!!!!

Supreme court justices, likely two hangs in the balance. That does filter down to our every day lives.
The court on Wednesday split on N.C. discriminatory actions to limit minority voting. If Scalia was alive, it would likey have stood.
Few things scare me more than the far swing to the right.

Yes, Hilary has made a money grab. Get in line.
Where was all this outrage when the Bush Family was raking in the cash?
This all about a women doing things men have been doing for decades and we want some sweet grandma "Barbara Bush" type women?
Think Bengazi is the first embassy we ever lost? Far from it. Its the first that we went on a bipartisan witch hunt on.
Im not a raving Hilary lover but if she is "crooked" then Trump is 10x worse!

BTW, he lost me when he slammed John McCain and called him a "Loser" for getting captured in war. Most disgusting think I ever heard a candidate every say!
When some disillusioned Purple heart recipient gave his metal to Trump he said "Cool, I always wanted one of these"!!! That is wrong as so many levels.
Trump is the guy that got out of Vietnam by a sham docter letter. That's ok, but don't take another mans metal!!!
This guy is rotten to the core.
Made fun of a disfigured reporter? He looked like a dumb teenager in need of maturity! Not a 70 year old man of "substance".
Bans reporters from papers with a history of fact checking?

Obama was gonna take your guns. Didn't happen. Obama was gonna take the Ammo. Prices went up. Gun dudes fall for this crap all the time. president can't take away a constitutional amendment.
ChickenSHyt NRA pansies now blasting that rhetoric? How many times we going to get taken by that lobby?


Nothing Hilary has done even comes close to what this guy is about!
No doubt its a Shyt Show but a 25billion dollar wall cheered by ignorant white uneducated gun lovers who fall for fear mongering crap over and over is validation enough for me that I can't vote for trump and if you don't vote for Hilary you might end up with him!

Stand up and vote for the democracy. This country has never been perfect but we cannot succumb to fearful ignorance and a right wing agenda that moves us away from the beacon of light that is our constitution!!!!!
We are a country of compassion and justice, not "America First".

I disagree that Trump is more dangerous than Hillary. Most of the problems this country faces began or were accelerated during the Clinton presidency. Policies which Secretary Clinton fully supported at the time. Someone who took a very visible role in her husband's administration. No traditional first lady was she (yoda)

Even though she has reversed herself on the TPP, the head of her campaign and her pick for VP are ardent supporters for this trade pack. If it passes the Supreme Court will take a back seat to 3 corporate lawyers who will decide any lawsuit brought by a corporation against the US, and the US govt will not have any recourse. Its effectively ceding control of our govt to multi-national corporations. Trump is against the trade pack, Clinton I guarantee will support it again when elected. They both present horrific problems for this country if elected.

Not even getting into the specifics of which candidate is against what.

You do understand trade agreements are not passed without congressional approval, correct?

You do realize that the president of the United States is the head of his or her party? As head of the Democratic party, if Hillary Clinton decides she wants the TPP pushed through, she will mobilize her administration to get the votes to enact it. I believe that is exactly what she will do as president.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/2/2016  7:26 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:I do my political fighting elsewhere on the internet...not going crazy here.

The Trump campaign is ALL about the racial and religious balance in the nation, and the changes taking place in the populace. They are scared ****less

You are talking about McCarthy like pre-loyalty tests for new immigrants and the kind of restrictions we saw in the late 19th and early 20th centuries directed against groups like the Chinese.

Guy is one of the biggest grifter/con men we've every had running for office...maybe the biggest. You saw him call the Mexicans coming into the U.S. victims while he was in Mexico...and then bring up some folks who were victims of illegal alien crimes in Phoenix and using the same rhetoric he used in the primaries.

And on Saturday he's now being "interviewed" by an African-Am pastor, only we now know it is a SCRIPTED interview...almost like an infomercial! Funny thing, though- I bet that I, an atheist, would kick his ass in a debate about the Bible, because you can bet that he knows as much about that book as he does about the Constitution.

It is really kind of pathetic how some have fallen for this guy...a classic Big Lie...blame the other for what you are doing liar and hypocrite.

He is make George Bush look a lot better with his pandering to racists and "know nothing" xenophobes, and I have to that folks who look at him as some sort of a messianic figure are in a reality I want to have no part of.

Sad thing is that he is no true populist, and he would have nothing to do with any of you unless it was for a photo op because he has no time for you.

A famous person doesn't really want to take a picture with the normal folk?. Nah couldn't have guessed that one?? I think some people Re really missing the boat. Hillary Clinton really does not give a sht about peoples needs heck she called minorities super predators. I think Trump wants to do a good job. I really don't know what Hillary wants past being female pres 1. I think trump can be worked with

RIP Crushalot😞
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

9/2/2016  7:38 PM
Bless your heart, guns. You are adorable.

gunsnewing wrote:That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people.

DIPLOMATIC WIN!

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

9/2/2016  7:53 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/2/2016  7:54 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
holfresh wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
DrAlphaeus wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:I wasn't happy with how Trump changed his to e again when speaking to supporters. Either he is purposely trying to rile up his supporters thinking there is enough of them who will vote him in or he's still not seeing the full picture. It was getting harder for me to defend his more recent actions but I really liked how his new campaign manager reeled him in and got him back on message. Right before he canned Maniford I was saying Trump needs to stop getting sidetracked and ease up with the unnecessary rhetoric that Has done him no good. In fact lead to him falling 10pts behind Hillary in he polls. He closed within 2pts as of last night but I'm sure his deficit increased some after last nights speech. His new campaign manager seemed to get brought to him that I order to win he needs to use more unifying language and policies. He was sounding as Presidential as ever for a past few weeks. He meeting with the President of Mexico went well and then he got sidetracked again late last night

If two people have a meeting, and come away from it with two wildly different accounts on what was even discussed — i.e. Mexico paying for a big, beautiful wall on our southern border — how is that an example of a meeting that went well?

There is no way for us to know what actually was said in that off-the-record meeting, so how can you say it went well?

Same way we don't know what Trump is hiding financially, because he won't release any of his tax returns. This is unprecedented behavior from a major party candidate since Watergate. Only 3rd party Perot in '92 didn't do this.

But I guess once you become a billionaire you don't have to worry about accountability and transparency, right? Anyone vigilant about Hillary's obscurantism but is so easily able to give Trump a pass on his is being a hypocrite.

Went well in terms of both Trump and the Mexican President want to end drug cartels and violent criminals. Both their stance on the subject have been well documented.

That meeting was more than Obama or Hillary have ever done for Mexico and their people. As the Mexican President is probably wondering and as the thread asks Where's Hillary?


Here they are at the White house on Aug. 16,2016..You can google the press conference to see what Obama has done with Mexico compared to Trump...As far as doing stuff for the Mexican people, remember NAFTA and who was in the White House??I do realize this isn't an exercise exploring the facts, I just thought I would offer..I know America yearn for the dog and pony optics...

And that took holfresh a whole 5 minutes to find I bet. Thanks for doing guns' homework! And actually I think that meeting pictured was in Mexico in 2014.

Hillary has done more for Mexico via her (problematic) foundation than anything Trump has.

But let's keep saying "Obama and Hillary have done nothing" guns and keep our head in the sand.

And what did that meeting accomplish other than more terrible trade deals for us? Cute picture though

You can't listen to Trump and Bernie Sanders..Both would say anything to get into office...They both played on people's fears...

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/247649-no-mr-trump-mexico-is-not-killing-us-on-trade

No, Mr. Trump, Mexico is not 'killing us on trade'

Donald Trump manifests profound ignorance of Mexico, our third-largest trading partner. He also insults Mexicans and their leaders who negotiated trade agreements that Trump says he would have negotiated better.

Problems: his insulting tone, his marketing of his own dark fantasies and his grievous choice of words.

Does he know there are 160 million Mexicans and Mexican-Americans? Does he know that Mexicans have bought trillions of dollars' worth of goods and services from the United States in recent years? Does he know that millions of Americans go to work every day to work in trade with Mexico?

The real problem with Trump's outburst against Mexicans is that he says all Mexicans are "killing us on trade ... and the country of Mexico is making billions of dollars in doing so." But that, Mr. Trump, is not true.

Trump: "I believe that my examples of bad trade deals for the United States was [sic] of even more concern to the Mexican government than my talk of border security."

What examples, Mr. Trump? I don't see any.

Trump: "I have great respect for Mexico and love their people and their peoples' great spirit. The problem is, however, that their leaders are far smarter, more cunning, and better negotiators than ours."

Great respect, really?

Mr. Trump, yes or no, do Mexicans benefit the United States?

Trade: In 1993, before NAFTA took effect (which it did in January 1994), Mexico bought $41 billion in goods and services from the U.S. and sold $39 Billion worth to the United States. Total: $80 billion. In the first year of NAFTA, the $80 billion increased to $99 billion, a 25 percent increase.

Ten years after NAFTA started, total trade between the U.S. and Mexico was $145 billion — an increase of 55 percent. In 2003, almost twenty years after NAFTA began, total trade with Mexico was $506 billion — half a trillion dollars — which is 632 percent more than 1994.

In 2014, by contrast, the United States exported $123 billion in goods to China and imported $466 billion from China. That's a minus $343 billion imbalance in trade. In 2014, the U.S. exported $49 billion of goods to Germany and imported $123 billion for an imbalance of minus $73 billion (lots of Mercedes and BMWs).

Here is something that Mr. Trump apparently does not know: U.S.-Mexico trade is unique in the world; there is a "production sharing" program between Mexico and the United States in which, according to the Wilson Center's Mexico Institute, "A full 40 [percent] of the content of U.S. imports from Mexico is actually produced in the United States. ... This means that forty cents of every dollar spent on imports from Mexico comes back to the United States, a quantity ten times greater that the four cents returning for each dollar paid on Chinese imports."

This production sharing with Mexico is vital for the United States. For example, between 2009 and 2014, according to the Congressional Research Service, the U.S. imported a total of $341 billion in cars and car parts from Mexico, of which $136 billion was the 40 percent that Mexico bought from us to install in cars assembled in Mexico, then exported to the U.S. In $341 billion dollars worth of goods imported from China, 4 percent would be $13 billion — compared to 10 times more from Mexico.

"Production sharing" means that the U.S. has an actual positive balance of trade with Mexico, rather than huge deficits as with China, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan etc. For example, in 2014, Mexico sold $290 billion to the U.S. Forty percent of $290 Billion is $116 billion which, when added to the $240 billion in goods and services we sold Mexico, totals at $356 billion, or a positive trade balance of $182 billion. Mr. Trump, do the math.

The Wilson Center also posits that "There are 6 million U.S. jobs that depend on trade with Mexico. Two border states that trade extensively with Mexico, California (692,000 jobs) and Texas (463,000 jobs) have the most…Detroit (alone) exports $10.9 BILLION in cars and car parts to Mexico (part of the total of $20 BILLION worth of cars and auto parts exported to Mexico)."

The United States Chamber of Commerce offers a higher estimate of 14 million American jobs in trade with Mexico.

In short, Trump's 22,000 jobs don't amount to much compared to the 6 million to 14 million Americans who work in trade with Mexico. Mexico-dependent jobs number between 272 and 622 times more than Trump's payroll.

On balance, it can be said that trade with Mexico and Mexicans is far more beneficial to the United States and millions of Americans than not.

Why, then, is anyone taking Trump seriously? We know that Mexico benefits millions upon millions of Americans in jobs and lower prices in goods such as flat-screen TVs, cars, fruits and vegetables. How many Mexican-made cars sold in the U.S. cost as much as cars made in Europe? None!

Trump insists that Mexico is ripping us off by buying $356 billion in goods and services from us last year and more than a trillion dollars' worth since 2010.

Donald Trump insults Mexicans, our best customers. That's good business?

Contreras formerly was syndicated by Creators Syndicate and the New America News Service of The New York Times Syndicate.

Where the heck is Hillary Clinton?

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy