[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Upgraded Knicks Guards
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/29/2016  7:27 PM
I think it's a very misunderstood truth that this group of Knicks guards is a major upgrade and not just a wash or minimal upgrade as some have characterized it. Too much focus has been placed on the recent TS%, which is of course important but it's not the whole picture when it comes to what we should get from these guards.

The increased speed, handles and aggressiveness is going to have a huge impact IMO. When you look at Drives per game the shift is monumental. Remember this isn't all penetration. It's not including fast breaks either. Just Drives starting from at least 20 feet away from the basket.

Drives Per Game:


Player Team GP W L MIN DRIVES FGM FGA FG% FTM FTA FT% PTS
Derrick Rose CHI 66 32 34 31.8 8.9 2.8 5.5 51.0 1.3 1.7 76.1 6.9
Brandon Jennings ORL 48 20 28 18.1 2.4 0.4 1.0 40.4 0.5 0.6 76.7 1.3
Courtney Lee CHA 79 49 30 29.6 2.1 0.6 1.3 44.4 0.3 0.4 81.3 1.4
9.6 ppg

Jose Calderon NYK 72 29 43 28.1 2.2 0.2 0.5 48.6 0.2 0.2 85.7 0.6
Arron Afflalo NYK 71 27 44 33.4 2.2 0.5 1.2 42.0 0.3 0.4 69.2 1.3
Langston Galloway NYK 82 32 50 24.8 1.3 0.5 0.9 48.1 0.2 0.3 63.0 1.1
3.0 ppg

I'd like to see more drives, more assists and more FT's produced but it's still a very nice improvement.

We see a much more aggressive group with a higher rate of drives per minute:

Drives Frequency:

Rose       Drive every  3.57 Minutes
Jennings Drive every 7.54 Minutes
Lee Drive every 14.09 Minutes

Calderon Drive every 12.77 Minutes
Afflalo Drive every 15.18 Minutes
Galloway Drive every 19.07 Minutes

Pick and Roll will be another avenue for more production. Part of the problem here is that the Knicks didn't really run a lot of PnR in their schemes. This isn't so much about the players as it will be about the Coach and Scheme this year. Still I think that the production should be better overall with this group.

Pick and Roll:


Player Team GP Poss Freq PPP PTS FGM FGA FG% eFG% FT TO SF And 1 Score Percentile
Derrick Rose CHI 66 563 43.5% 0.84 474 207 466 44.4 44.8 7.6% 12.3% 7.3% 2.7% 41.4% 68.3
Courtney Lee CHA 28 43 17.0% 0.93 40 17 36 47.2 47.2 9.3% 9.3% 9.3% 2.3% 46.5% 86.6
Brandon Jennings ORL 25 80 37.7% 0.61 49 17 58 29.3 32.8 10.0% 18.8% 7.5% 2.5% 27.5% 17.2

Jose Calderon NYK 72 212 38.1% 0.83 176 77 179 43.0 45.3 4.2% 12.3% 2.8% 0.9% 39.6% 64.8
Jerian Grant NYK 75 185 35.0% 0.72 134 45 120 37.5 37.9 15.1% 22.2% 14.6% 2.7% 36.2% 37.9
Langston Galloway NYK 82 121 17.4% 0.74 90 36 99 36.4 39.4 7.4% 11.6% 4.1% 0.8% 35.5% 41.4


With Hornacek adding a much more PnR, Screen heavy and Spread floor attack the amount of opportunities to drive and kick should increase with these particular guards who have the kind of talent to take advantage of that. With Melo and KP on the floor these guards must get used to kicking to them out of PnR, Dribble Hand Offs and Drag Screens. These guards should be able to suck the defender in with their speed. There should be dump off opportunities for Noah and also offensive rebounds for KP to grab if he crashes the boards as he did last year.

Lee, Holliday and Sasha are most likely going to be more fast break and spot up 3 guards but they also have some ability to get to the basket and that will only add to the overall impact as a team. The overall balance is very nice. The real hope is for some improvement from these guards as 3pt shooters. If that happens then we're really talking. No doubt JH will focus on that aspect of things.

AUTOADVERT
callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

7/29/2016  11:25 PM
hmm? but isnt this comparing apples and oranges? rose, jennings and lee didnt play in the triangle last yr and jose, affalo and gallo did. whether its the triangle circle or square, my overall point is that its hard to compare stats on (drives to the basket) if they play in different systems

but yes i agree with your overall sentiment that the back court is better. (youn could put Me out there and it wouldve been better. lol). its not just better its SIGNIFICANTLY better.

to me, the big x-factor is what exactly will jeff hornecek be running with this offense. while i dont think it will be 100% triangle, i also dont think it will be 100% PNR. most likely it will be an offense catered around their best player (carmelo - for better or for worse).

Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/29/2016  11:40 PM
callmened wrote:hmm? but isnt this comparing apples and oranges? rose, jennings and lee didnt play in the triangle last yr and jose, affalo and gallo did. whether its the triangle circle or square, my overall point is that its hard to compare stats on (drives to the basket) if they play in different systems

but yes i agree with your overall sentiment that the back court is better. (youn could put Me out there and it wouldve been better. lol). its not just better its SIGNIFICANTLY better.

to me, the big x-factor is what exactly will jeff hornecek be running with this offense. while i dont think it will be 100% triangle, i also dont think it will be 100% PNR. most likely it will be an offense catered around their best player (carmelo - for better or for worse).

I did mention that the Knicks didn't run PnR a lot last year, but that still doesn't stop a guard from driving to the basket. The thing is that the new guards will massively increase the rate of drives to the rim. They will push the ball more often not just because of the change in style due to Hornacek but because they are guards who naturally play faster and more aggressively.

Hornacek is still going to use the Triangle but not in the same way that it was run before. He believes in Early Offense and like MDA believes in the 7 seconds or less philosophy. The more early scoring attempts you get the better. The stats show that teams get better baskets earlier in the shot clock before the defense is fully set.

They won't always be able to get early offense but they will also employ more PnR out of the same Triangle sets plus move the non post players behind the 3pt line instead of inside of it. These small changes are actually huge for the way this team will play. Hornacek used all kinds of screens and not just PnR. That's a big part of his style. All of the stuff he ran can be run out of the Triangle. That's what's great about his being the coach now.

tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

7/30/2016  10:00 AM
JH's offense is far more than just simple screen and roll. There are tons of wrinkles and multiple options. It's very rare that you see any team run continuous basic PNR. The whole triangle vs pnr thing is obnoxious too.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2016  11:07 AM
tj23 wrote:JH's offense is far more than just simple screen and roll. There are tons of wrinkles and multiple options. It's very rare that you see any team run continuous basic PNR. The whole triangle vs pnr thing is obnoxious too.

THANK YOU!!! It's so annoying. I've said since day one that the Triangle System is flexible. It's entirely up to the coach what he chooses to feature in the overall system. There's never been just one way to run the Triangle. Coaches have been running their own version of the Triangle for DECADES. Sam Barry invented it and his pupil Tex Winter took it to another level. Other coaches like Cotton Fitzsimmons ran it their way before Phil even learned it. Phil tweaked it from there, Thibs and Pop ran some of it and now Hornacek will run it his way.

callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

7/30/2016  11:13 AM
i'm very excited about coach hornecek. i was a fan of his as a player and as a coach. The player i most excited for is KP. yes i agree the guards are upgraded and their natural ability is to drive. but i like about the JH system is what it does for stretch 5s. If JH can resurrect the career of channing frye in that offense then think of what KP will do.

to me, im happy because the guards are improved and JH is more of a PNR coach. but to me my biggest excitement is what this will do for the development of KP (which is all i really care about - rose, jennings are nice upgrades but hopefully not here for the long term). KP is this teams next franchise player. all i ask is that he continues to develop and they find a REAL franchise PG to play next to him. the main reasons i like phil's offseason moves is because they upgrded without compromising KPs future

Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/30/2016  12:06 PM
callmened wrote:hmm? but isnt this comparing apples and oranges? rose, jennings and lee didnt play in the triangle last yr and jose, affalo and gallo did. whether its the triangle circle or square, my overall point is that its hard to compare stats on (drives to the basket) if they play in different systems

but yes i agree with your overall sentiment that the back court is better. (youn could put Me out there and it wouldve been better. lol). its not just better its SIGNIFICANTLY better.

to me, the big x-factor is what exactly will jeff hornecek be running with this offense. while i dont think it will be 100% triangle, i also dont think it will be 100% PNR. most likely it will be an offense catered around their best player (carmelo - for better or for worse).

I agree, the system and pace will dictate the way a player plays. That slow half court pace was completely ridiculous.

ES
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2016  12:33 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/30/2016  12:33 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
callmened wrote:hmm? but isnt this comparing apples and oranges? rose, jennings and lee didnt play in the triangle last yr and jose, affalo and gallo did. whether its the triangle circle or square, my overall point is that its hard to compare stats on (drives to the basket) if they play in different systems

but yes i agree with your overall sentiment that the back court is better. (youn could put Me out there and it wouldve been better. lol). its not just better its SIGNIFICANTLY better.

to me, the big x-factor is what exactly will jeff hornecek be running with this offense. while i dont think it will be 100% triangle, i also dont think it will be 100% PNR. most likely it will be an offense catered around their best player (carmelo - for better or for worse).

I agree, the system and pace will dictate the way a player plays. That slow half court pace was completely ridiculous.


The plan was NEVER to play slow but now the players and coach are a better fit for uptempo. The change of focus is going to be very important for this team. A lot of these guys are right in their prime and have a good level of NBA experience.

I actually think the bench will be able to play even faster than the starters, depending on Hornacek's rotation. There's a good amount of speed and athletic ability on the bench.


NAME POS AGE HT WT
Derrick Rose PG 27 6-3 190
Courtney Lee SG 30 6-5 200
Carmelo Anthony SF/PF 32 6-8 240
Kristaps Porzingis PF/C 20 7-3 240
Joakim Noah C 31 6-11 232

Brandon Jennings PG 26 6-1 169
Justin Holiday SG 27 6-6 185
Sasha Vujacic SG 32 6-7 195

Lance Thomas SF 28 6-8 235
Mindaugas Kuzminskas F 26 6-8 216
Maurice Daly Ndour SF 24 6-9 200

Kyle O'Quinn C/PF 26 6-10 250
Guillermo Hernangomez C 22 6-10 240
Marshall Plumlee C 24 7-0 250

It's going to be important that our other players can keep up with our guards if they push the pace. EVERYONE has to run and play uptempo for this to work. I'm fairly confident the guards will do their part, so the forwards and C's have to push.

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

7/30/2016  12:39 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/30/2016  12:41 PM
The guards have been upgraded, true, but there are still major concerns -- Rose/Jennings injury situation, no true ball-handler behind them, can Holiday take the next step?, I don't care for Sasha at all, etc.. I still say we're one guard short. I don't think this should be taken lightly. Don't really understand the laissez faire attitude here at all. Not sure Baker and Randle are the answers and worth waiting for, not when there are still some good quality option out there...Wish we were a little more aggressive trying to fill this last spot.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
7/30/2016  12:41 PM
Finestrg wrote:The guards have been upgraded, true, but there are still major concerns -- Rose/Jennings injury situation, no true ball-handler behind them, can Holiday take the next step?, I don't care for Sasha at all, etc.. I still say we're one guard short. I don't think this should be taken lightly. Don't really understand the laissez faire attitude here at all. Not sure Baker and Randle are worth waiting for, not when there are still some good option out there...Wish we were a little more aggressive trying to fill this last spot.
Maybe they bring a guy into Westchester that could make the jump to the nba if needed.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

7/30/2016  2:08 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/30/2016  3:07 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
Finestrg wrote:The guards have been upgraded, true, but there are still major concerns -- Rose/Jennings injury situation, no true ball-handler behind them, can Holiday take the next step?, I don't care for Sasha at all, etc.. I still say we're one guard short. I don't think this should be taken lightly. Don't really understand the laissez faire attitude here at all. Not sure Baker and Randle are worth waiting for, not when there are still some good option out there...Wish we were a little more aggressive trying to fill this last spot.
Maybe they bring a guy into Westchester that could make the jump to the nba if needed.

Could be. I just feel like we're a little exposed being down one guard and I'm not sure Baker or Randle are the answers (Baker does intrigue me though -- I would've much preferred Baker over Sasha Vujacic, I can tell you that. To me, that's where Ron Baker fits and fits well--as a 3rd string SG, not as a 3rd PG who very well will see game action at some point next season). I bet right now this player, whoever it may be, gets trust into action as some point during the season. It'll get taken care of but the longer we wait, the less options we'll have (the Sixers just signed Cat Barber a few days ago for example. I would've LOVED to get that kid, on his explosive Monta Ellis-type potential alone). I'd like to see Phil be aggressive filling this spot, not merely sifting though leftovers at a later time. Could go the other way too, I understand--decent guards could shake loose from other teams during/after training camp, but that's just leaving a lot up to chance, no?

Spencer Dinwiddie and Bryce Cotton are two young guards I've liked for a long time. Now all of a sudden we have the need, the open spot and these two are available. To me, for the little money we're talking, you ink up either Dinwiddie or Cotton right now without hesitation (two guys that have performed well in limited NBA action mind you -- go look at tape of what Dinwiddie did in his first start in the NBA for Detroit against Derrick Rose and then look at highlights and the improvement of Bryce Cotton from his days at Providence, to his complete domination of the DL, excellent play in SL a few years in a row now and the fine stint he had in the NBA when called up by Utah--this dude's a player w/o question, a souped-up Patty Mills imo), then look to bring a Baker or Randle to training camp to compete (what does each guy deserve beyond this when you think about it?). If by some reason adjustments need to be made and guys need to be cut in favor of better options, neither guy would be making a lot of money--you cut 'em and move forward, just like we did with Tony Wroten. Amounts to nothing more than a miniscule monetary hit for Dolan, that's it. Chump change..It's worth the nominal amount of money right now to stay aggressive.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2016  3:12 PM
Finestrg wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Finestrg wrote:The guards have been upgraded, true, but there are still major concerns -- Rose/Jennings injury situation, no true ball-handler behind them, can Holiday take the next step?, I don't care for Sasha at all, etc.. I still say we're one guard short. I don't think this should be taken lightly. Don't really understand the laissez faire attitude here at all. Not sure Baker and Randle are worth waiting for, not when there are still some good option out there...Wish we were a little more aggressive trying to fill this last spot.
Maybe they bring a guy into Westchester that could make the jump to the nba if needed.

Could be. I just feel like we're a little exposed being down one guard and I'm not sure Baker or Randle are the answers (Baker does intrigue me though -- I would've much preferred Baker over Sasha Vujacic, I can tell you that. To me, that's where Ron Baker fits and fits well--as a 3rd string SG, not as a 3rd PG who very well will see game action at some point next season). I bet right now this player, whoever it may be, gets trust into action as some point during the season. It'll get taken care of but the longer we wait, the less options we'll have (the Sixers just signed Cat Barber a few days ago for example. I would've LOVED to get that kid, on his explosive Monta Ellis-type potential alone). I'd like to see Phil be aggressive filling this spot, not merely sifting though leftovers at a later time. Could go the other way too, I understand--decent guards could shake loose from other teams during/after training camp, but that's just leaving a lot up to chance, no?

Spencer Dinwiddie and Bryce Cotton are two young guards I've liked for a long time. Now all of a sudden we have the need, the open spot and these two are available. To me, for the little money we're talking, you ink up either Dinwiddie or Cotton right now without hesitation (two guys that have performed well in limited NBA action mind you -- go look at tape of what Dinwiddie did in his first start in the NBA for Detroit against Derrick Rose and then look at highlights and the improvement of Bryce Cotton from his days at Providence, to his complete domination of the DL, excellent play in SL a few years in a row now and the fine stint he had in the NBA when called up by Utah--this dude's a player w/o question, a souped-up Patty Mills imo), then look to bring a Baker or Randle to training camp to compete (what does each guy deserve beyond this when you think about it?). If by some reason adjustments need to be made and guys need to be cut in favor of better options, neither guy would be making a lot of money--you cut 'em and move forward, just like we did with Tony Wroten. Amounts to nothing more than a miniscule monetary hit for Dolan, that's it. Chump change..It's worth the nominal amount of money right now to stay aggressive.


In the past we've had this kind of discussion on the forum and I would remind everyone that it's not always the Knicks not trying to sign guys but rather the Agents holding out for the best deal. That could be more of a reason for the Knicks not signing anyone than them just not being active.
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

7/30/2016  4:22 PM
nixluva wrote:
tj23 wrote:JH's offense is far more than just simple screen and roll. There are tons of wrinkles and multiple options. It's very rare that you see any team run continuous basic PNR. The whole triangle vs pnr thing is obnoxious too.

THANK YOU!!! It's so annoying. I've said since day one that the Triangle System is flexible. It's entirely up to the coach what he chooses to feature in the overall system. There's never been just one way to run the Triangle. Coaches have been running their own version of the Triangle for DECADES. Sam Barry invented it and his pupil Tex Winter took it to another level. Other coaches like Cotton Fitzsimmons ran it their way before Phil even learned it. Phil tweaked it from there, Thibs and Pop ran some of it and now Hornacek will run it his way.


Yeah Fisher even altered it during the season a bit. You have to use actions that fit your players strengths. Like on the Triangle heavy side there would be a low post entry and the guard and forward would cut through, but Robin being an unskilled passer Derek decided to switch to a split that would either free up Jose or Melo and make it an easier pass. I'd like to see more motion into PNR as well as some flare screens, which is an easy way to free up some shooters ocassionally, depending on how much freedom Jeff is given. I'm a huge fan of Horns, but I think that might be a bit of a reach to think that we'll break that far from Phil's precious shape lol
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2016  5:54 PM
tj23 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
tj23 wrote:JH's offense is far more than just simple screen and roll. There are tons of wrinkles and multiple options. It's very rare that you see any team run continuous basic PNR. The whole triangle vs pnr thing is obnoxious too.

THANK YOU!!! It's so annoying. I've said since day one that the Triangle System is flexible. It's entirely up to the coach what he chooses to feature in the overall system. There's never been just one way to run the Triangle. Coaches have been running their own version of the Triangle for DECADES. Sam Barry invented it and his pupil Tex Winter took it to another level. Other coaches like Cotton Fitzsimmons ran it their way before Phil even learned it. Phil tweaked it from there, Thibs and Pop ran some of it and now Hornacek will run it his way.


Yeah Fisher even altered it during the season a bit. You have to use actions that fit your players strengths. Like on the Triangle heavy side there would be a low post entry and the guard and forward would cut through, but Robin being an unskilled passer Derek decided to switch to a split that would either free up Jose or Melo and make it an easier pass. I'd like to see more motion into PNR as well as some flare screens, which is an easy way to free up some shooters ocassionally, depending on how much freedom Jeff is given. I'm a huge fan of Horns, but I think that might be a bit of a reach to think that we'll break that far from Phil's precious shape lol

I wouldn't be so sure. In truth the Triangle isn't about Side Triangle Purity. It's actually about defeating a defense, so really a team should feature whatever actually works. Most other teams that run Triangle actually don't use the Side Triangle Post feed. They mainly use the Pinch Post side of the floor for it's great spacing. I suspect that JH will do the same thing. One of my favorite tweaks that Fisher used in the Half Court, but not often enough, was to set up in the Side Triangle but with 3pt spacing and then have KP come out and set a screen to create a 4 out look. This would be very good when they go small.

Rose and KP would Kill doing this. The 3pt shots would be there all day. This is what I think Hornacek will do in the Half Court in addition to maybe using some Horns as well to switch things up. It's not a major deal to slide into a Horns look early in the shot clock and if things don't materialize you could still flow into a Side Triangle. It's not a hard set rule that you have to immediately set up the Side Triangle.

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
7/30/2016  6:05 PM
callmened wrote:i'm very excited about coach hornecek. i was a fan of his as a player and as a coach. The player i most excited for is KP. yes i agree the guards are upgraded and their natural ability is to drive. but i like about the JH system is what it does for stretch 5s. If JH can resurrect the career of channing frye in that offense then think of what KP will do.

to me, im happy because the guards are improved and JH is more of a PNR coach. but to me my biggest excitement is what this will do for the development of KP (which is all i really care about - rose, jennings are nice upgrades but hopefully not here for the long term). KP is this teams next franchise player. all i ask is that he continues to develop and they find a REAL franchise PG to play next to him. the main reasons i like phil's offseason moves is because they upgrded without compromising KPs future

+1 it should all be about shifting the focus to building a team and a system around kp6. see how far he can go before he hits a ceiling... which should be VERY high.

it's really up to how well the point guards adjust to deferring at every reasonable opportunity. i also want to see a two-man game, on one hand kp6 with melo and with noah, and then noah and melo together. lots of potential playmaking among those three. and yes, i expect hornacek to mold kp6 into a playmaker, and along with noah's expertise and guidance i am hoping to see this aspect of kp6's game to be developed this season. his court vision is excellent and he has solid passing fundamentals.

go knicks!! we're overdue to make some real noise.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

7/30/2016  10:37 PM
nixluva wrote:
tj23 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
tj23 wrote:JH's offense is far more than just simple screen and roll. There are tons of wrinkles and multiple options. It's very rare that you see any team run continuous basic PNR. The whole triangle vs pnr thing is obnoxious too.

THANK YOU!!! It's so annoying. I've said since day one that the Triangle System is flexible. It's entirely up to the coach what he chooses to feature in the overall system. There's never been just one way to run the Triangle. Coaches have been running their own version of the Triangle for DECADES. Sam Barry invented it and his pupil Tex Winter took it to another level. Other coaches like Cotton Fitzsimmons ran it their way before Phil even learned it. Phil tweaked it from there, Thibs and Pop ran some of it and now Hornacek will run it his way.


Yeah Fisher even altered it during the season a bit. You have to use actions that fit your players strengths. Like on the Triangle heavy side there would be a low post entry and the guard and forward would cut through, but Robin being an unskilled passer Derek decided to switch to a split that would either free up Jose or Melo and make it an easier pass. I'd like to see more motion into PNR as well as some flare screens, which is an easy way to free up some shooters ocassionally, depending on how much freedom Jeff is given. I'm a huge fan of Horns, but I think that might be a bit of a reach to think that we'll break that far from Phil's precious shape lol

I wouldn't be so sure. In truth the Triangle isn't about Side Triangle Purity. It's actually about defeating a defense, so really a team should feature whatever actually works. Most other teams that run Triangle actually don't use the Side Triangle Post feed. They mainly use the Pinch Post side of the floor for it's great spacing. I suspect that JH will do the same thing. One of my favorite tweaks that Fisher used in the Half Court, but not often enough, was to set up in the Side Triangle but with 3pt spacing and then have KP come out and set a screen to create a 4 out look. This would be very good when they go small.

Rose and KP would Kill doing this. The 3pt shots would be there all day. This is what I think Hornacek will do in the Half Court in addition to maybe using some Horns as well to switch things up. It's not a major deal to slide into a Horns look early in the shot clock and if things don't materialize you could still flow into a Side Triangle. It's not a hard set rule that you have to immediately set up the Side Triangle.


I'm not opposed to low post touches or corner PNR. Noah seems like he can make every pass so he deserves some touches to initiate some offense and get us easy buckets. KP should be groomed to play down low as well although I do value his versatility.

2 major issues we had last year were breaking down defenses and beating pressure. We were simply too slow and didn't have the handles. Guards couldn't turn the corner on the PNR and when defenders clamped down and overplayed, we couldn't ever get anything backdoor. The increase in athleticism should force teams to play us more honest. I just worry a bit about our perimeter shooting.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2016  11:52 PM
tj23 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
tj23 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
tj23 wrote:JH's offense is far more than just simple screen and roll. There are tons of wrinkles and multiple options. It's very rare that you see any team run continuous basic PNR. The whole triangle vs pnr thing is obnoxious too.

THANK YOU!!! It's so annoying. I've said since day one that the Triangle System is flexible. It's entirely up to the coach what he chooses to feature in the overall system. There's never been just one way to run the Triangle. Coaches have been running their own version of the Triangle for DECADES. Sam Barry invented it and his pupil Tex Winter took it to another level. Other coaches like Cotton Fitzsimmons ran it their way before Phil even learned it. Phil tweaked it from there, Thibs and Pop ran some of it and now Hornacek will run it his way.


Yeah Fisher even altered it during the season a bit. You have to use actions that fit your players strengths. Like on the Triangle heavy side there would be a low post entry and the guard and forward would cut through, but Robin being an unskilled passer Derek decided to switch to a split that would either free up Jose or Melo and make it an easier pass. I'd like to see more motion into PNR as well as some flare screens, which is an easy way to free up some shooters ocassionally, depending on how much freedom Jeff is given. I'm a huge fan of Horns, but I think that might be a bit of a reach to think that we'll break that far from Phil's precious shape lol

I wouldn't be so sure. In truth the Triangle isn't about Side Triangle Purity. It's actually about defeating a defense, so really a team should feature whatever actually works. Most other teams that run Triangle actually don't use the Side Triangle Post feed. They mainly use the Pinch Post side of the floor for it's great spacing. I suspect that JH will do the same thing. One of my favorite tweaks that Fisher used in the Half Court, but not often enough, was to set up in the Side Triangle but with 3pt spacing and then have KP come out and set a screen to create a 4 out look. This would be very good when they go small.

Rose and KP would Kill doing this. The 3pt shots would be there all day. This is what I think Hornacek will do in the Half Court in addition to maybe using some Horns as well to switch things up. It's not a major deal to slide into a Horns look early in the shot clock and if things don't materialize you could still flow into a Side Triangle. It's not a hard set rule that you have to immediately set up the Side Triangle.


I'm not opposed to low post touches or corner PNR. Noah seems like he can make every pass so he deserves some touches to initiate some offense and get us easy buckets. KP should be groomed to play down low as well although I do value his versatility.

2 major issues we had last year were breaking down defenses and beating pressure. We were simply too slow and didn't have the handles. Guards couldn't turn the corner on the PNR and when defenders clamped down and overplayed, we couldn't ever get anything backdoor. The increase in athleticism should force teams to play us more honest. I just worry a bit about our perimeter shooting.


I'm actually fairly satisfied with the shooters we have. Everyone will be involved so Lee, Melo, KP and Lance in particular are capable 3pt shooters. I don't think we have much to worry about from 3pt range. With better spacing and penetration our shooters should be more accurate.
It helps a lot when you have that extra split second to get your shot off cleanly.

Also Noah really helps with the ball movement. I liked RoLo but he was so slow with the ball and Noah is a high level passer. It's one of the missing aspects of the offense. Great cuts will be rewarded.

I agree that the breakdown ability of this team is much improved and should help loosen up defenses. That's the part of the game that Analytics guys are missing. Worrying so much about the TS% of Rose misses the other ways that Rose can help this team with his speed and breakdown ability. He will draw defensive attention, which this team sorely missed from the guards spots.

Upgraded Knicks Guards

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy