[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT: Melo Steps Forward
Author Thread
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

7/28/2016  1:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/28/2016  1:05 PM
arkrud wrote:Simply say if you take 1 million dollars and give it to million people.
Then they all go to the store and by pack of cigarettes made on government factory which is subsidized itself.
Then wealth worth 1 million is reduces to nothing.

I am not advocating for or against capitalism, socialism or any other ism.

But you are oversimplifying the issue.

Part of that million dollar also gets distributed to the trucking company that got it from the factory to the local 7-11 it was purchased.

And to the company that manufactured the wall display 7-11 tobacco products are kept on. And to the distribution company that probably sold it to them.

And of course the owners/franchisees of the 7-11 takes a few cents as well, part of which makes it to the franchisor.

AUTOADVERT
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

7/28/2016  1:38 PM
Knickoftime wrote:Can a Trump supporter please attempt to justify encouraging Russia to perform espionage on his political opponent, and accusing Putin of calling Obama the 'n'-word please?

Bonus points if you can do it without comparing them to some other thing you think Clinton did that was worse (which I don't expect to have to pay out).


Craziest thing is that Trump was not sharp enough to understand that Putin was not using the "n" word Trump thought he was using, but rather "nuclear"...he clearly does not read for comprehension, or have the ability to do serious writing (thus, Twitter)

Putin is too savvy to use the "n" word Trump is talking about in public, and since Assange is probably being paid by the Russians, he doesn't have to worry about his emails being hacked, it would seem.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/28/2016  1:40 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
arkrud wrote:Simply say if you take 1 million dollars and give it to million people.
Then they all go to the store and by pack of cigarettes made on government factory which is subsidized itself.
Then wealth worth 1 million is reduces to nothing.

I am not advocating for or against capitalism, socialism or any other ism.

But you are oversimplifying the issue.

Part of that million dollar also gets distributed to the trucking company that got it from the factory to the local 7-11 it was purchased.

And to the company that manufactured the wall display 7-11 tobacco products are kept on. And to the distribution company that probably sold it to them.

And of course the owners/franchisees of the 7-11 takes a few cents as well, part of which makes it to the franchisor.

Obviously I did and I stated later that it is much more complicated that that.
What happens (and i witness this myself) in all countries with centralized socialism economy wealth is moving into underground market economy and money laundering process eats into it. The overall inefficiency and corruption adds to it so economy is falling apart rather quickly.
The recessions and bubble bursting processes in capitalist economies are also destroying large amount of wealth but it is mostly inflated capital which has no real material base in the economy. There are still individual losers in this process. But this is the nature of the beast not some administratively forced ideological process.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

7/28/2016  3:35 PM
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:The poverty levels are extreme in those countries, that is fair to state. India being the worse.

It is only recent that these countries are trying to turn to more markets economies after years of state controlled economies. Bangladesh is as corrupt as countries come.
A turn to capitalism has helped undermine the Caste system in India. Those who were once the lowest have not risen socially as well as economically BUT there is still far to go.

I do not think it is fair to say they have been capitalist countries and the poverty was entrenched well before they have attempted to turn their policies around.

1991 is the year India enacted economic reform - including massive deregulation, adoption of free markets etc. This chart shows you what happened to corporate profits and inflation adjusted real wages of industrial workers from 1983 onwards.

In 2014, 58% of population of India made less than $3.50 a day


Good chart, It illustrates a point that you were making. I think adding in that CEO's, in India are making thousands a day, would hammer it home more.

You would agree that 1970's India was socialist with Poverty at almost 70%. In 2010 the poverty rate is now much less (20% or less depending on source). In 2012 the line was considered $1.25 per day. So while $3.50/day, is horrific for an American standard, it is not as bad when you look at it relative to what the daily living expenses are in India.

Sorry, but I would agree to nothing such. There is no credible source of data on poverty in India prior to the 90s. Throwing out 70% isn't gonna make it stick. The Indian government has been extremely corrupt and their standards of computing poverty in the earlier years has been questioned by all manner of people and organizations.

$3.50 is not the poverty line for 2015, that's still at the $1.25 level, I provided the $3.50 to show what it means to be "above the poverty line" in India (that accounts for about 37% of the population over and above the 21% below the actual poverty line). And those numbers are Purchasing Power Parity adjusted so it already accounts for conditions relative to India. PPP adjusted $3.50 is the equivalent of a person making $3.50 in the local economy here in 2011. I probably should have explained that better.

I have seen the 21% number in the same charts as the nearly 70% number.


The quality of life has improved for most since the reforms.
There is no arguing that GDP for the country has been exponential since the reforms.

There is zero evidence that the quality of life has improved for anyone but the top 10th percentile
No one is arguing about GDP growth the argument is about what that growth does for the people of the country


What is more true now is that with the reforms, almost all have a chance to make more than before whereas before you had to be of a higher caste to even have a chance. For example, the middle class has grown in India.

You clearly don't understand how the caste system has played out in India - the many injustices are heavily weighed on the social scale not the economical. Protection for lower castes in education and job market has been in the books for over 35 years now.

I thought we were talking economics and the poor. I was not discussing the caste system other than saying it is being undermined by the rise of economic opportunity of the lower castes. Undermined in that with greater economic and political equality more attention is being given to the lack of social equality. Which is a good thing. The Caste system is a far greater issue in India that is embedded in religion and culture.

The bottom line is there is improvement but old philosophies and mind sets are still at work. There is a difference in their rural vs urban economies which is a factor in the gap. Overall the top 1% in INdia have half the wealth.

World wide, the top 1% saw a decrease from 2000 to 2009 (48.7 to 44%) and this has increased back to 48.2% since 2009 to now.

This last part I agree with, but not necessarily about the mindsets. The business sector completely embraced full bore capitalism, they are the ones making economic decisions at the micro level.

Right now 80 of the World's richest people have more wealth than 3.5 Billion of the world's poorest people. Capitalism will continue to make that gap more and more stark. By 2020, 95% of the world's population will have 5% of the wealth and the means to support their lives.

As I understand you (see last bolded part), you believe that Capitalism is the reason for the wealth gap here, in India and worldwide. What economic system will reverse the trend? Assuming that is what you are advocating.

I don't have one. I am just saying what we do going forward needs to ficus on the human condition instead of wealth aggregation, or power hegemony by one small narrow group of people. But, I absolutely do think it will require redistribution of wealth.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

7/28/2016  3:48 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/28/2016  3:55 PM
On the caste system part, I misunderstood what you were saying and I agree with your position based on your clarification.

On the 21% poverty line thing, I am looking at world Bank data, they have some data for the 80s bit nothing for 70s. They also have a clear disclaimer saying data from before the 90s is"best available". But generally the Indian government manipulated the hell out of it before reporting it to make themselves look better.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
7/28/2016  3:57 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:On the caste system part, I misunderstood what you were saying and I agree with your position based on your clarification.

On the 21% poverty line thing, I am looking at world Bank data, they have some data for the 80s bit nothing for 70s. They also have a clear disclaimer saying data from before the 90s is"best available". But generally the Indian government manipulated the hell out of it before reporting it to make themselves look better.

Fair enough.

GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
7/28/2016  4:02 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:The poverty levels are extreme in those countries, that is fair to state. India being the worse.

It is only recent that these countries are trying to turn to more markets economies after years of state controlled economies. Bangladesh is as corrupt as countries come.
A turn to capitalism has helped undermine the Caste system in India. Those who were once the lowest have not risen socially as well as economically BUT there is still far to go.

I do not think it is fair to say they have been capitalist countries and the poverty was entrenched well before they have attempted to turn their policies around.

1991 is the year India enacted economic reform - including massive deregulation, adoption of free markets etc. This chart shows you what happened to corporate profits and inflation adjusted real wages of industrial workers from 1983 onwards.

In 2014, 58% of population of India made less than $3.50 a day


Good chart, It illustrates a point that you were making. I think adding in that CEO's, in India are making thousands a day, would hammer it home more.

You would agree that 1970's India was socialist with Poverty at almost 70%. In 2010 the poverty rate is now much less (20% or less depending on source). In 2012 the line was considered $1.25 per day. So while $3.50/day, is horrific for an American standard, it is not as bad when you look at it relative to what the daily living expenses are in India.

Sorry, but I would agree to nothing such. There is no credible source of data on poverty in India prior to the 90s. Throwing out 70% isn't gonna make it stick. The Indian government has been extremely corrupt and their standards of computing poverty in the earlier years has been questioned by all manner of people and organizations.

$3.50 is not the poverty line for 2015, that's still at the $1.25 level, I provided the $3.50 to show what it means to be "above the poverty line" in India (that accounts for about 37% of the population over and above the 21% below the actual poverty line). And those numbers are Purchasing Power Parity adjusted so it already accounts for conditions relative to India. PPP adjusted $3.50 is the equivalent of a person making $3.50 in the local economy here in 2011. I probably should have explained that better.

I have seen the 21% number in the same charts as the nearly 70% number.


The quality of life has improved for most since the reforms.
There is no arguing that GDP for the country has been exponential since the reforms.

There is zero evidence that the quality of life has improved for anyone but the top 10th percentile
No one is arguing about GDP growth the argument is about what that growth does for the people of the country


What is more true now is that with the reforms, almost all have a chance to make more than before whereas before you had to be of a higher caste to even have a chance. For example, the middle class has grown in India.

You clearly don't understand how the caste system has played out in India - the many injustices are heavily weighed on the social scale not the economical. Protection for lower castes in education and job market has been in the books for over 35 years now.

I thought we were talking economics and the poor. I was not discussing the caste system other than saying it is being undermined by the rise of economic opportunity of the lower castes. Undermined in that with greater economic and political equality more attention is being given to the lack of social equality. Which is a good thing. The Caste system is a far greater issue in India that is embedded in religion and culture.

The bottom line is there is improvement but old philosophies and mind sets are still at work. There is a difference in their rural vs urban economies which is a factor in the gap. Overall the top 1% in INdia have half the wealth.

World wide, the top 1% saw a decrease from 2000 to 2009 (48.7 to 44%) and this has increased back to 48.2% since 2009 to now.

This last part I agree with, but not necessarily about the mindsets. The business sector completely embraced full bore capitalism, they are the ones making economic decisions at the micro level.

Right now 80 of the World's richest people have more wealth than 3.5 Billion of the world's poorest people. Capitalism will continue to make that gap more and more stark. By 2020, 95% of the world's population will have 5% of the wealth and the means to support their lives.

As I understand you (see last bolded part), you believe that Capitalism is the reason for the wealth gap here, in India and worldwide. What economic system will reverse the trend? Assuming that is what you are advocating.

I don't have one. I am just saying what we do going forward needs to ficus on the human condition instead of wealth aggregation, or power hegemony by one small narrow group of people. But, I absolutely do think it will require redistribution of wealth.

OK. Thanks for your honest answer. IMHO, I don't think that will be possible without many millions of people suffering least of all by the very group that holds the wealth. IN other words it won't be voluntary.

meloanyk
Posts: 20768
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2013
Member: #5615

7/28/2016  4:56 PM
arkrud wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
arkrud wrote:Simply say if you take 1 million dollars and give it to million people.
Then they all go to the store and by pack of cigarettes made on government factory which is subsidized itself.
Then wealth worth 1 million is reduces to nothing.

I am not advocating for or against capitalism, socialism or any other ism.

But you are oversimplifying the issue.

Part of that million dollar also gets distributed to the trucking company that got it from the factory to the local 7-11 it was purchased.

And to the company that manufactured the wall display 7-11 tobacco products are kept on. And to the distribution company that probably sold it to them.

And of course the owners/franchisees of the 7-11 takes a few cents as well, part of which makes it to the franchisor.

Obviously I did and I stated later that it is much more complicated that that.
What happens (and i witness this myself) in all countries with centralized socialism economy wealth is moving into underground market economy and money laundering process eats into it. The overall inefficiency and corruption adds to it so economy is falling apart rather quickly.
The recessions and bubble bursting processes in capitalist economies are also destroying large amount of wealth but it is mostly inflated capital which has no real material base in the economy. There are still individual losers in this process. But this is the nature of the beast not some administratively forced ideological process.

Akrud, Most people resent inequities but many people also resent success by others so socialism is their great equalizer regardless of it's history of limitations and failure. The inconvenient reality is that while some are born and raised to priviledge and excess, the vast majority are not. The truth is that the 1% that people cite is really more the .001% to .005 that own America's wealth . Most of the 1% ( ann. income of 430k or higher) and certainly most of the 10% ( 160k or higher) get to their position in life by getting educated, developing a distinct talent, working long hard hours, taking risks establishing businesses and having the abilty to innovate. They are professionals, business owners and entrpreneurs, they save, invest and reinvest rather than spend frivously and most are charitable and concerned rather than white supremists plotting to suppress. I don't begrudge anyone ( beyond the flaunting ssssholes) who makes that 1% category whether it be my friend who immigrated from Russia and made his small fortune driving a yellow taxi for years using his earnings to buy medallions to lease out or a Muslim associate who makes 500k in IT, or the Korean immigrant next door who made his empire opening grocery stores and then acquiring commercial buildings with his profits or my wealthy Jewish heart surgeon who came out of his ghetto with student loans up the gazoo or my 3rd gen Italian friend who makes $3-4 mil a year from acquiring warehouses through LEVERAGING and now gainfully employs 2k people or even the inventors of Google who make whatever absurd monies they make. It is proper to discuss and understand black history, the causes and effects and to look for improvements and eradications of systematic but for gawd sake black leaderss and culture in general have to take stock and be accountable to themselves. Take head on the issue of 73% out of wedlock births, 66 % single parent families , the literacy rates of black youth at every level that score below every other racial and ethnic group that knocks many out of viable employment and leads them to prison in disproportionate numbers as much as any racially biased white system does. Kids should not be walking through metal detectors because classmates are carrying knives or guns. 70% of prisones have the literacy of a 4th grader, 85% of juvenile deliquenst who interface with the courts are functionally illiterate. That is a HUGE problem that hasn't been resolved with more funding and it won't be without a change in cultural norms in addition to other changes that are necessary. As far as middle class, technological innovation has reduced the need and value of many job functions and will continue to do so. Even the educated will need to adapt to the changing work envoronment and regear their skillsets and career direction to avoid wage stagflation or obsolescence. The great recession obviously hurt the middle but the trend has been to both higher pay tier for specific talents or lower paying employment for general work. Could expand more on middle class amid today's corporations but this post is all ready too long so I'll leave it for another day

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/28/2016  4:58 PM
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:The poverty levels are extreme in those countries, that is fair to state. India being the worse.

It is only recent that these countries are trying to turn to more markets economies after years of state controlled economies. Bangladesh is as corrupt as countries come.
A turn to capitalism has helped undermine the Caste system in India. Those who were once the lowest have not risen socially as well as economically BUT there is still far to go.

I do not think it is fair to say they have been capitalist countries and the poverty was entrenched well before they have attempted to turn their policies around.

1991 is the year India enacted economic reform - including massive deregulation, adoption of free markets etc. This chart shows you what happened to corporate profits and inflation adjusted real wages of industrial workers from 1983 onwards.

In 2014, 58% of population of India made less than $3.50 a day


Good chart, It illustrates a point that you were making. I think adding in that CEO's, in India are making thousands a day, would hammer it home more.

You would agree that 1970's India was socialist with Poverty at almost 70%. In 2010 the poverty rate is now much less (20% or less depending on source). In 2012 the line was considered $1.25 per day. So while $3.50/day, is horrific for an American standard, it is not as bad when you look at it relative to what the daily living expenses are in India.

Sorry, but I would agree to nothing such. There is no credible source of data on poverty in India prior to the 90s. Throwing out 70% isn't gonna make it stick. The Indian government has been extremely corrupt and their standards of computing poverty in the earlier years has been questioned by all manner of people and organizations.

$3.50 is not the poverty line for 2015, that's still at the $1.25 level, I provided the $3.50 to show what it means to be "above the poverty line" in India (that accounts for about 37% of the population over and above the 21% below the actual poverty line). And those numbers are Purchasing Power Parity adjusted so it already accounts for conditions relative to India. PPP adjusted $3.50 is the equivalent of a person making $3.50 in the local economy here in 2011. I probably should have explained that better.

I have seen the 21% number in the same charts as the nearly 70% number.


The quality of life has improved for most since the reforms.
There is no arguing that GDP for the country has been exponential since the reforms.

There is zero evidence that the quality of life has improved for anyone but the top 10th percentile
No one is arguing about GDP growth the argument is about what that growth does for the people of the country


What is more true now is that with the reforms, almost all have a chance to make more than before whereas before you had to be of a higher caste to even have a chance. For example, the middle class has grown in India.

You clearly don't understand how the caste system has played out in India - the many injustices are heavily weighed on the social scale not the economical. Protection for lower castes in education and job market has been in the books for over 35 years now.

I thought we were talking economics and the poor. I was not discussing the caste system other than saying it is being undermined by the rise of economic opportunity of the lower castes. Undermined in that with greater economic and political equality more attention is being given to the lack of social equality. Which is a good thing. The Caste system is a far greater issue in India that is embedded in religion and culture.

The bottom line is there is improvement but old philosophies and mind sets are still at work. There is a difference in their rural vs urban economies which is a factor in the gap. Overall the top 1% in INdia have half the wealth.

World wide, the top 1% saw a decrease from 2000 to 2009 (48.7 to 44%) and this has increased back to 48.2% since 2009 to now.

This last part I agree with, but not necessarily about the mindsets. The business sector completely embraced full bore capitalism, they are the ones making economic decisions at the micro level.

Right now 80 of the World's richest people have more wealth than 3.5 Billion of the world's poorest people. Capitalism will continue to make that gap more and more stark. By 2020, 95% of the world's population will have 5% of the wealth and the means to support their lives.

As I understand you (see last bolded part), you believe that Capitalism is the reason for the wealth gap here, in India and worldwide. What economic system will reverse the trend? Assuming that is what you are advocating.

I don't have one. I am just saying what we do going forward needs to ficus on the human condition instead of wealth aggregation, or power hegemony by one small narrow group of people. But, I absolutely do think it will require redistribution of wealth.

OK. Thanks for your honest answer. IMHO, I don't think that will be possible without many millions of people suffering least of all by the very group that holds the wealth. IN other words it won't be voluntary.

So we will do our own Great Revolution like Russia in 1917...
Good luck with staying alive..

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/28/2016  5:15 PM
meloanyk wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
arkrud wrote:Simply say if you take 1 million dollars and give it to million people.
Then they all go to the store and by pack of cigarettes made on government factory which is subsidized itself.
Then wealth worth 1 million is reduces to nothing.

I am not advocating for or against capitalism, socialism or any other ism.

But you are oversimplifying the issue.

Part of that million dollar also gets distributed to the trucking company that got it from the factory to the local 7-11 it was purchased.

And to the company that manufactured the wall display 7-11 tobacco products are kept on. And to the distribution company that probably sold it to them.

And of course the owners/franchisees of the 7-11 takes a few cents as well, part of which makes it to the franchisor.

Obviously I did and I stated later that it is much more complicated that that.
What happens (and i witness this myself) in all countries with centralized socialism economy wealth is moving into underground market economy and money laundering process eats into it. The overall inefficiency and corruption adds to it so economy is falling apart rather quickly.
The recessions and bubble bursting processes in capitalist economies are also destroying large amount of wealth but it is mostly inflated capital which has no real material base in the economy. There are still individual losers in this process. But this is the nature of the beast not some administratively forced ideological process.

Akrud, Most people resent inequities but many people also resent success by others so socialism is their great equalizer regardless of it's history of limitations and failure. The inconvenient reality is that while some are born and raised to priviledge and excess, the vast majority are not. The truth is that the 1% that people cite is really more the .001% to .005 that own America's wealth . Most of the 1% ( ann. income of 430k or higher) and certainly most of the 10% ( 160k or higher) get to their position in life by getting educated, developing a distinct talent, working long hard hours, taking risks establishing businesses and having the abilty to innovate. They are professionals, business owners and entrpreneurs, they save, invest and reinvest rather than spend frivously and most are charitable and concerned rather than white supremists plotting to suppress. I don't begrudge anyone ( beyond the flaunting ssssholes) who makes that 1% category whether it be my friend who immigrated from Russia and made his small fortune driving a yellow taxi for years using his earnings to buy medallions to lease out or a Muslim associate who makes 500k in IT, or the Korean immigrant next door who made his empire opening grocery stores and then acquiring commercial buildings with his profits or my wealthy Jewish heart surgeon who came out of his ghetto with student loans up the gazoo or my 3rd gen Italian friend who makes $3-4 mil a year from acquiring warehouses through LEVERAGING and now gainfully employs 2k people or even the inventors of Google who make whatever absurd monies they make. It is proper to discuss and understand black history, the causes and effects and to look for improvements and eradications of systematic but for gawd sake black leaderss and culture in general have to take stock and be accountable to themselves. Take head on the issue of 73% out of wedlock births, 66 % single parent families , the literacy rates of black youth at every level that score below every other racial and ethnic group that knocks many out of viable employment and leads them to prison in disproportionate numbers as much as any racially biased white system does. Kids should not be walking through metal detectors because classmates are carrying knives or guns. 70% of prisones have the literacy of a 4th grader, 85% of juvenile deliquenst who interface with the courts are functionally illiterate. That is a HUGE problem that hasn't been resolved with more funding and it won't be without a change in cultural norms in addition to other changes that are necessary. As far as middle class, technological innovation has reduced the need and value of many job functions and will continue to do so. Even the educated will need to adapt to the changing work envoronment and regear their skillsets and career direction to avoid wage stagflation or obsolescence. The great recession obviously hurt the middle but the trend has been to both higher pay tier for specific talents or lower paying employment for general work. Could expand more on middle class amid today's corporations but this post is all ready too long so I'll leave it for another day

Agree with you an all counts.
And my life experience and all people I know and interact with have similar stories.
I think all of us agree on the issues at hand even if we may disagree on the scale.
What is polarizing is the question on how this issues come to be and who if anyone is responsible.
Also there is no consensus on how to tackle this issues and who have the obligation to lead, finance, and do the actual leg work.
The big issue is that a large group of people is moved to this country not by choice. This generated huge psychological, economical, and social strain which is truly unique and continue to linger. Probably only time and long time (like many generations) can resolve it. It starts with family, with neighborhood, with school, with everything which defines human being. And it is changing very slowly.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
7/28/2016  11:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/28/2016  11:16 PM
arkrud wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:The poverty levels are extreme in those countries, that is fair to state. India being the worse.

It is only recent that these countries are trying to turn to more markets economies after years of state controlled economies. Bangladesh is as corrupt as countries come.
A turn to capitalism has helped undermine the Caste system in India. Those who were once the lowest have not risen socially as well as economically BUT there is still far to go.

I do not think it is fair to say they have been capitalist countries and the poverty was entrenched well before they have attempted to turn their policies around.

1991 is the year India enacted economic reform - including massive deregulation, adoption of free markets etc. This chart shows you what happened to corporate profits and inflation adjusted real wages of industrial workers from 1983 onwards.

In 2014, 58% of population of India made less than $3.50 a day


Good chart, It illustrates a point that you were making. I think adding in that CEO's, in India are making thousands a day, would hammer it home more.

You would agree that 1970's India was socialist with Poverty at almost 70%. In 2010 the poverty rate is now much less (20% or less depending on source). In 2012 the line was considered $1.25 per day. So while $3.50/day, is horrific for an American standard, it is not as bad when you look at it relative to what the daily living expenses are in India.

Sorry, but I would agree to nothing such. There is no credible source of data on poverty in India prior to the 90s. Throwing out 70% isn't gonna make it stick. The Indian government has been extremely corrupt and their standards of computing poverty in the earlier years has been questioned by all manner of people and organizations.

$3.50 is not the poverty line for 2015, that's still at the $1.25 level, I provided the $3.50 to show what it means to be "above the poverty line" in India (that accounts for about 37% of the population over and above the 21% below the actual poverty line). And those numbers are Purchasing Power Parity adjusted so it already accounts for conditions relative to India. PPP adjusted $3.50 is the equivalent of a person making $3.50 in the local economy here in 2011. I probably should have explained that better.

I have seen the 21% number in the same charts as the nearly 70% number.


The quality of life has improved for most since the reforms.
There is no arguing that GDP for the country has been exponential since the reforms.

There is zero evidence that the quality of life has improved for anyone but the top 10th percentile
No one is arguing about GDP growth the argument is about what that growth does for the people of the country


What is more true now is that with the reforms, almost all have a chance to make more than before whereas before you had to be of a higher caste to even have a chance. For example, the middle class has grown in India.

You clearly don't understand how the caste system has played out in India - the many injustices are heavily weighed on the social scale not the economical. Protection for lower castes in education and job market has been in the books for over 35 years now.

I thought we were talking economics and the poor. I was not discussing the caste system other than saying it is being undermined by the rise of economic opportunity of the lower castes. Undermined in that with greater economic and political equality more attention is being given to the lack of social equality. Which is a good thing. The Caste system is a far greater issue in India that is embedded in religion and culture.

The bottom line is there is improvement but old philosophies and mind sets are still at work. There is a difference in their rural vs urban economies which is a factor in the gap. Overall the top 1% in INdia have half the wealth.

World wide, the top 1% saw a decrease from 2000 to 2009 (48.7 to 44%) and this has increased back to 48.2% since 2009 to now.

This last part I agree with, but not necessarily about the mindsets. The business sector completely embraced full bore capitalism, they are the ones making economic decisions at the micro level.

Right now 80 of the World's richest people have more wealth than 3.5 Billion of the world's poorest people. Capitalism will continue to make that gap more and more stark. By 2020, 95% of the world's population will have 5% of the wealth and the means to support their lives.

As I understand you (see last bolded part), you believe that Capitalism is the reason for the wealth gap here, in India and worldwide. What economic system will reverse the trend? Assuming that is what you are advocating.

I don't have one. I am just saying what we do going forward needs to ficus on the human condition instead of wealth aggregation, or power hegemony by one small narrow group of people. But, I absolutely do think it will require redistribution of wealth.

OK. Thanks for your honest answer. IMHO, I don't think that will be possible without many millions of people suffering least of all by the very group that holds the wealth. IN other words it won't be voluntary.

So we will do our own Great Revolution like Russia in 1917...
Good luck with staying alive..

Ha. That didn't work out so well for millions did it? No thanks. I like your idea better. Educate and inform.

OT: Melo Steps Forward

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy