[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Shouldn't we not sign any PG and allow Grant another season to develop as our future PG?
Author Thread
jskinny35
Posts: 21646
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
6/21/2016  11:53 PM
Seen the threads about trying to sign a Conley, Rose or another vet PG this season. While Wroten's future is unknown, aren't we better off letting Grant develop? He showed some signs toward the end of last season, and PG's sometimes take 2-3 years to fully blossom. We now have a system that seems perfect for Grant's skill set. I say save our money and see if he progresses this season. The worst case scenario is he doesn't and we still retain money for the following free agent season. Best case is he takes a step and demonstrates a future as our PG. Let's put some money into resigning D.Williams (if reasonable) and adding a better fit at SG or combo guard. Thoughts welcome...
AUTOADVERT
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

6/21/2016  11:56 PM
Its up to Phil and Hornecek. Hornecek said they would like a guy to be a fill in between Grant and Jose but that could all be a smokescreen.

I just hope Grant gets regular minutes this year.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

6/22/2016  12:17 AM
Grant has talent and is NBA level. However i think thats where it ends. I cant see him being more than a Patrick Beverly type of player. With the Lopez, Porzingis front court, and Melo outside, we need to give Melo something like we saw with Lebron in CLE. A guy in Irving who could break defenses down, help take pressure of the star forward. I know Melo isnt Lebron, and Conley isnt going to be as good as Irving, but we need that guard out there who can give the team 15/5 or more a night with 3 point shooting. That isnt likely Grant, i like Grant as a high energy backup point guard that comes in and pushes the tempo of the offense and game.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

6/22/2016  6:32 AM
Grant averaged 14 and 5 in April. I know that's fools gold but he did do that. He finally cane out of his shell. If he came close to that the Knicks would be alright. Same with Tony Wroten. Wroten averaged 16 and 5 the season he tie his acl in Philly. I believe in both players especially Wroten. The Knicks still have an opportunity to add a legit vet that we know will produce without question. If the Knicks feel they found that guy then so be it.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Nalod
Posts: 72114
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/22/2016  7:03 AM
jskinny35 wrote:Seen the threads about trying to sign a Conley, Rose or another vet PG this season. While Wroten's future is unknown, aren't we better off letting Grant develop? He showed some signs toward the end of last season, and PG's sometimes take 2-3 years to fully blossom. We now have a system that seems perfect for Grant's skill set. I say save our money and see if he progresses this season. The worst case scenario is he doesn't and we still retain money for the following free agent season. Best case is he takes a step and demonstrates a future as our PG. Let's put some money into resigning D.Williams (if reasonable) and adding a better fit at SG or combo guard. Thoughts welcome...

Its best to only discuss players who have had success in the past then use imagination to consider development of others already in the system.

Yes, conceptually Grant should be given time to develop, and for all we know, he will be. But fans prefer to reach for things we don't already have.

Im sure there is a base line for Grant and his upside, but we are just not privy to it. For all we know, he gets traded as we did Hardaway.

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27736
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/22/2016  7:26 AM
I see Grant as a core player in that Charlie Ward sense. Floor General Grant. This first unit really needs a 3&D PG and an All Star SG to be competitive. If we walked away this offseason with Derozan and Grant became our PG, I wouldn't complain, I just don't think we would have the floor spacing Hornacek aims for. If Grant, at 6'5 with a 6'7 wingspan can become a defensive stopper, his playmaking skill will put him in the first unit anyway. Either way, I don't see him carrying the starting role without significant improvement. With 5 years of college ball behind him and a basketball pedigree, I am partially inclined to say he is what he is. The fan in me hopes he finds another level in his game.
You know I gonna spin wit it
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/22/2016  8:39 AM
There is no bigger fan or believer in Grant on this board than myself. When I heard that trade on draft day I was hooting and hollering. That being said you need more guys. I am not ready or willing to hand Grant the keys to drive this ship all by himself. You need depth and quality depth. Grant can play both guard spots. I highly value his skill set and could see him playing next to Conley.

Just because we get Conley doesn't mean Grant gets kicked to the curb. If we sign Conley there are still 35mpg sitting out there for Grant to take if he plays well.

We have no guards... Is LG even signed? We need guys. The more talent the better, and unlike with centers or PFs guards can share the floor, especially with the NBA small ball lineups.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

6/22/2016  9:14 AM
i'm on bored with this plan. besides i dont think free agent PGs will come our way unless we over pay for them (like rondo). instead id rather invest in a SG - crabbe, bazemore - and a cheap stop gap PG (mack, etwaun) and then look for a star PG in next yrs FA class or draft class
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/22/2016  9:52 AM
Would like to see Grant get the time to develop his game, but we have two PGs in Grant and Wroten with little NBA experience. Would like to move Calderon for someone with more left in the tank. Doesn't have to be a big time FA, but someone good enough to help get us to the playoffs while Grant and Wroten learn.

Grant may have a breakout year (which would be awesome), but I would like to see the Knicks hedge their bets with an upgrade at starting PG.

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/22/2016  10:01 AM
fishmike wrote:There is no bigger fan or believer in Grant on this board than myself. When I heard that trade on draft day I was hooting and hollering. That being said you need more guys. I am not ready or willing to hand Grant the keys to drive this ship all by himself. You need depth and quality depth. Grant can play both guard spots. I highly value his skill set and could see him playing next to Conley.

Just because we get Conley doesn't mean Grant gets kicked to the curb. If we sign Conley there are still 35mpg sitting out there for Grant to take if he plays well.

We have no guards... Is LG even signed? We need guys. The more talent the better, and unlike with centers or PFs guards can share the floor, especially with the NBA small ball lineups.

I'm in this boat. Conley probably helps Grant get better faster anyway.

GSW have Shaun Livingston coming off the bench. You need lots of guards in this league.

Not to mention, Hornacek has run plenty of 2 PG lineups (which Melo did well with here) - who's to say we couldn't play Grant and Conley together?

¿ △ ?
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34075
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/22/2016  10:03 AM
No, I want a PG only because Horny knows how to play more than two points. I think that sometimes it's difficult to incorporate more than one pure point. I don't think that's the case with him and in some regards I think have multiples can be helpful. It seems that he wants his guards to be able to do more than drift outside and chuck a la THJ
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/22/2016  10:05 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:No, I want a PG only because Horny knows how to play more than two points. I think that sometimes it's difficult to incorporate more than one pure point. I don't think that's the case with him and in some regards I think have multiples can be helpful. It seems that he wants his guards to be able to do more than drift outside and chuck a la THJ

Yeah, exactly. JH was a SG, but he was a playmaking SG. So he wants both guards to be able to make plays. Which is also what Phil wants. They want slightly different things out of those guard plays - but the idea is the same - a two guard front with both guys able to make read and react plays.

Also, I think Conley would be perfect for such a system. I think Rondo would be pretty good for it, too. I even like Jennings in that role, if healthy.

But we need more playmaking guards.

¿ △ ?
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/22/2016  10:22 AM
GustavBahler wrote:Would like to see Grant get the time to develop his game, but we have two PGs in Grant and Wroten with little NBA experience. Would like to move Calderon for someone with more left in the tank. Doesn't have to be a big time FA, but someone good enough to help get us to the playoffs while Grant and Wroten learn.

Grant may have a breakout year (which would be awesome), but I would like to see the Knicks hedge their bets with an upgrade at starting PG.

I cant think of a faster way to facilitate a breakout year for Grant than to play him next to Conley. Grant is an excellent slashing and playing off the ball a bit will really help build up his scoring and have him filling out the stat sheet. He can slide to backup PG when Conley sits and play in 3 guard aligns. Takes the pressure off a sophomore player.

Another option is Wroten at SG and Grant off the bench. First guard off the bench will need to play both spots or in 3 guard sets, and that is a 30mpg role, so I am not worried about squeezing out young guys is we sign a good player like Conley.

Wroten at SG strikes me as the best option for him. He's a guy who get his own shot. While his shooting numbers are not he hits the corner 3 really well which is a nice floor spacer for SG, and a nice spot on the floor to slash against opposing SGs as well.

Bottom line to me is Conley pushed Grant/Wroten into role they are better suited for now. I cant remember NBA teams that have a "too much talent" problem.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/22/2016  10:23 AM
crzymdups wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:No, I want a PG only because Horny knows how to play more than two points. I think that sometimes it's difficult to incorporate more than one pure point. I don't think that's the case with him and in some regards I think have multiples can be helpful. It seems that he wants his guards to be able to do more than drift outside and chuck a la THJ

Yeah, exactly. JH was a SG, but he was a playmaking SG. So he wants both guards to be able to make plays. Which is also what Phil wants. They want slightly different things out of those guard plays - but the idea is the same - a two guard front with both guys able to make read and react plays.

Also, I think Conley would be perfect for such a system. I think Rondo would be pretty good for it, too. I even like Jennings in that role, if healthy.

But we need more playmaking guards.


One way or another Phil and JH will upgrade the guard spots. We will add a vet and i'm pretty sure a couple of young guards will be brought in as well. Phil loves Combo guards and I can see why. You get a guard that can handle and create shot for himself and others. Just having a Pure PG or Pure SG that can't create is limiting in today's game much like bigs that can't stretch the floor. You get more versatility from players with versatile skills.
Kemet
Posts: 22087
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/23/2015
Member: #6148

6/22/2016  10:37 AM
fishmike wrote:There is no bigger fan or believer in Grant on this board than myself. When I heard that trade on draft day I was hooting and hollering. That being said you need more guys. I am not ready or willing to hand Grant the keys to drive this ship all by himself. You need depth and quality depth. Grant can play both guard spots. I highly value his skill set and could see him playing next to Conley.

Just because we get Conley doesn't mean Grant gets kicked to the curb. If we sign Conley there are still 35mpg sitting out there for Grant to take if he plays well.

We have no guards... Is LG even signed? We need guys. The more talent the better, and unlike with centers or PFs guards can share the floor, especially with the NBA small ball lineups.


I too ..felt a big relief on draft night when we made the trade for Grant.
I agree 100% Grant is a combo-guard that brings a must needed energy off the bench to give us transition or half-court offense. I did expect us to sign a NBA starter FA Rondo last offseason when we grabbed Grant out of the draft. Having ball-handlers Calderon and Gallo perimeter shooting with Rondo running the point for 30 minutes a night.

At the start of the season, Grant gave us everything plus more in a rookie PG.
Rookie Grant out played veteran Calderon our first 20 games of the season (10-10 record) when being tandem with Gallo n Lance Thomas or Sasha by making our guard-defense tough to score on.

Afflalo was not the guard we needed last season in our rotation .. Giving Afflalo 34 minute a night destroyed our offense/defense plans for the season.

GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/22/2016  11:05 AM
fishmike wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:Would like to see Grant get the time to develop his game, but we have two PGs in Grant and Wroten with little NBA experience. Would like to move Calderon for someone with more left in the tank. Doesn't have to be a big time FA, but someone good enough to help get us to the playoffs while Grant and Wroten learn.

Grant may have a breakout year (which would be awesome), but I would like to see the Knicks hedge their bets with an upgrade at starting PG.

I cant think of a faster way to facilitate a breakout year for Grant than to play him next to Conley. Grant is an excellent slashing and playing off the ball a bit will really help build up his scoring and have him filling out the stat sheet. He can slide to backup PG when Conley sits and play in 3 guard aligns. Takes the pressure off a sophomore player.

Another option is Wroten at SG and Grant off the bench. First guard off the bench will need to play both spots or in 3 guard sets, and that is a 30mpg role, so I am not worried about squeezing out young guys is we sign a good player like Conley.

Wroten at SG strikes me as the best option for him. He's a guy who get his own shot. While his shooting numbers are not he hits the corner 3 really well which is a nice floor spacer for SG, and a nice spot on the floor to slash against opposing SGs as well.

Bottom line to me is Conley pushed Grant/Wroten into role they are better suited for now. I cant remember NBA teams that have a "too much talent" problem.

I dont have a problem with Phil signing Conley. Was advocating for Grant to get some time at SG last season to get his offense going. Jerian had too much on his plate with 2 coaches, the Triangle, and the pressure of playing in NYC.

As long as we dont go into next season with Calderon as starting PG, get an upgrade, the team should be in good shape. With Conley on board, I believe this team is good enough to get to the conference Semis.

WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/22/2016  11:31 AM
GustavBahler wrote:
fishmike wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:Would like to see Grant get the time to develop his game, but we have two PGs in Grant and Wroten with little NBA experience. Would like to move Calderon for someone with more left in the tank. Doesn't have to be a big time FA, but someone good enough to help get us to the playoffs while Grant and Wroten learn.

Grant may have a breakout year (which would be awesome), but I would like to see the Knicks hedge their bets with an upgrade at starting PG.

I cant think of a faster way to facilitate a breakout year for Grant than to play him next to Conley. Grant is an excellent slashing and playing off the ball a bit will really help build up his scoring and have him filling out the stat sheet. He can slide to backup PG when Conley sits and play in 3 guard aligns. Takes the pressure off a sophomore player.

Another option is Wroten at SG and Grant off the bench. First guard off the bench will need to play both spots or in 3 guard sets, and that is a 30mpg role, so I am not worried about squeezing out young guys is we sign a good player like Conley.

Wroten at SG strikes me as the best option for him. He's a guy who get his own shot. While his shooting numbers are not he hits the corner 3 really well which is a nice floor spacer for SG, and a nice spot on the floor to slash against opposing SGs as well.

Bottom line to me is Conley pushed Grant/Wroten into role they are better suited for now. I cant remember NBA teams that have a "too much talent" problem.

I dont have a problem with Phil signing Conley. Was advocating for Grant to get some time at SG last season to get his offense going. Jerian had too much on his plate with 2 coaches, the Triangle, and the pressure of playing in NYC.

As long as we dont go into next season with Calderon as starting PG, get an upgrade, the team should be in good shape. With Conley on board, I believe this team is good enough to get to the conference Semis.


Could Grant do better if Hornachek loosens up the Triangle a bit? I think the coaching change could help Grant.

I see him as a Derrick Harper type player and expect to be pleasantly surprised with his play this year.

I don't think Conley is coming here, but a veteran PG would still be a nice addition, and couldn't hurt Grant's development, IMO.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

6/22/2016  12:39 PM
crzymdups wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:No, I want a PG only because Horny knows how to play more than two points. I think that sometimes it's difficult to incorporate more than one pure point. I don't think that's the case with him and in some regards I think have multiples can be helpful. It seems that he wants his guards to be able to do more than drift outside and chuck a la THJ

Yeah, exactly. JH was a SG, but he was a playmaking SG. So he wants both guards to be able to make plays. Which is also what Phil wants. They want slightly different things out of those guard plays - but the idea is the same - a two guard front with both guys able to make read and react plays.

Also, I think Conley would be perfect for such a system. I think Rondo would be pretty good for it, too. I even like Jennings in that role, if healthy.

But we need more playmaking guards.

Looking at all three of these PGs, each has health issues and don't warrant a major investment of time and dollars. Plus, next year's class of free agents represent a vast improvement over this year's class. Let's find that SG gunslinger. Someone with ice in their veins and fire in their eyes. When we do get our PG (maybe he's already here), we'll have the tools to make a deep run.

"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/22/2016  12:44 PM
Sangfroid wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:No, I want a PG only because Horny knows how to play more than two points. I think that sometimes it's difficult to incorporate more than one pure point. I don't think that's the case with him and in some regards I think have multiples can be helpful. It seems that he wants his guards to be able to do more than drift outside and chuck a la THJ

Yeah, exactly. JH was a SG, but he was a playmaking SG. So he wants both guards to be able to make plays. Which is also what Phil wants. They want slightly different things out of those guard plays - but the idea is the same - a two guard front with both guys able to make read and react plays.

Also, I think Conley would be perfect for such a system. I think Rondo would be pretty good for it, too. I even like Jennings in that role, if healthy.

But we need more playmaking guards.

Looking at all three of these PGs, each has health issues and don't warrant a major investment of time and dollars. Plus, next year's class of free agents represent a vast improvement over this year's class. Let's find that SG gunslinger. Someone with ice in their veins and fire in their eyes. When we do get our PG (maybe he's already here), we'll have the tools to make a deep run.

Steph Curry is not coming here. Chris Paul is not coming here. I reject the notion that there is a realistic 2017 PG we should hold our breath for.

If Conley wants to come here now, he's a major upgrade and a perfect fit.

Additionally - I think the one realistic super FA in 2017 is Westbrook - and I think Conley would fit very well next to him.

We need to be GOOD for Westbrook to consider us. Conleys gets us GOOD.

¿ △ ?
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/22/2016  12:55 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
fishmike wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:Would like to see Grant get the time to develop his game, but we have two PGs in Grant and Wroten with little NBA experience. Would like to move Calderon for someone with more left in the tank. Doesn't have to be a big time FA, but someone good enough to help get us to the playoffs while Grant and Wroten learn.

Grant may have a breakout year (which would be awesome), but I would like to see the Knicks hedge their bets with an upgrade at starting PG.

I cant think of a faster way to facilitate a breakout year for Grant than to play him next to Conley. Grant is an excellent slashing and playing off the ball a bit will really help build up his scoring and have him filling out the stat sheet. He can slide to backup PG when Conley sits and play in 3 guard aligns. Takes the pressure off a sophomore player.

Another option is Wroten at SG and Grant off the bench. First guard off the bench will need to play both spots or in 3 guard sets, and that is a 30mpg role, so I am not worried about squeezing out young guys is we sign a good player like Conley.

Wroten at SG strikes me as the best option for him. He's a guy who get his own shot. While his shooting numbers are not he hits the corner 3 really well which is a nice floor spacer for SG, and a nice spot on the floor to slash against opposing SGs as well.

Bottom line to me is Conley pushed Grant/Wroten into role they are better suited for now. I cant remember NBA teams that have a "too much talent" problem.

I dont have a problem with Phil signing Conley. Was advocating for Grant to get some time at SG last season to get his offense going. Jerian had too much on his plate with 2 coaches, the Triangle, and the pressure of playing in NYC.

As long as we dont go into next season with Calderon as starting PG, get an upgrade, the team should be in good shape. With Conley on board, I believe this team is good enough to get to the conference Semis.


Could Grant do better if Hornachek loosens up the Triangle a bit? I think the coaching change could help Grant.

I see him as a Derrick Harper type player and expect to be pleasantly surprised with his play this year.

I don't think Conley is coming here, but a veteran PG would still be a nice addition, and couldn't hurt Grant's development, IMO.

all these things Walt... +1. Good post. I think JH immediately gets Grant to another level. Grant is a quiet kid but a work horse. I suspect those two gel immediately. At first I was iffy on Conley, his value, giving him big money but I also think he's a PERFECT fit for the new coach as well.

We give JH Conley, Grant, Galloway, Jose and Wroten to work with as guards and I expect the Knicks to play some pretty good ball and pretty quickly

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Shouldn't we not sign any PG and allow Grant another season to develop as our future PG?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy