| Author | Thread |
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
I've left out DeRozan, Batum, Beal, Wade, Crabbe and Fournier as I think they'll stay with their teams. I have also left out Eric Gordon because I DO NOT WANT.
Sources of the quoted bits are: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/the-vertical-guide-to-free-agency--small-forwards-161627550.html http://hoopshype.com/2016/05/03/nba-free-agency-2016-shooting-guards/Here are the realistic options:
Numbers have dropped off since last season. Versatile veteran who still is above average on defense and a complementary player on offense. Best bet going forward would be as a sixth man for a playoff team. Lance Stephenson: Lance Stephenson remains to the NBA what Russia was to Winston Churchill: a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. Kent Bazemore (may be more of a SF): Has picked up the slack after the Hawks lost DeMarre Carroll in free agency. Can play multiple positions. Has found a home in Atlanta and carved out a nice role. Early Bird rights will force Atlanta to use cap space if it wants to bring him back. Evan Turner: Finally has found his role with the Celtics. Does that change in another team’s system? Versatile and can play three positions, but best suited coming off the bench. Seth Curry: prospect or fluke? Then there are guys like Gerald Henderson and Kevin Martin. Ha, there aren't even 10 realistic targets! And hardly any are good shooters. Not great. Again, I still think our only hope is to trade Lopez (not because I hate him, I actually like him a lot, but because he's the only asset we have) for a PG, and then use our money on a SG and a part time C (aiming to move KP to C over the next year or two). So do people want us to blow most of the money on a PG, mostly on a SG (which would mean Bazemore or Turner), or split the money between the two and go for the smaller names (Curry, Stephenson or Lee)? |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
Finestrg
Posts: 27296 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/1/2006 Member: #1069 |
I still prefer Solomon Hill 1st choice in FA at this position; PJ Hairston, questionable past and all, 2nd choice.
Here's a good current article on Hill -- according to Ian Begley, one NBA exec. thinks he's worth between $7-9mm/year: Not only do I like Hill better than Crabbe as an overall player, I like that he probably goes for less than half of what Crabbe will command, plus it's a move that would weaken the Pacers in the process. Hairston, meanwhile, would come even cheaper -- I think he goes in the $5mm/yr range, maybe less. Ability-wise, I think Hairston compares favorably to Crabbe--he might have even more untapped talent than Crabbe. I'm telling ya, if we wanted to go on the frugal side in FA for guard help, Jerryd Bayless and PJ Hairston might be the best guards out there in terms of talent and value at the 1 & 2. I think you can make a case that both would come cheap and once we leaned on them for more responsibility/production, each could finally start showing their full worth. |