Author | Thread |
Paris907
Posts: 21146 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/4/2015 Member: #6099 USA |
6/1/2016 7:03 AM
I can't see Lin playing defense into the second round of the playoffs. He'd be exploited.
|
AUTOADVERT |
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
6/1/2016 9:43 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:fishmike wrote:Lin's quest for $$$ facilitated his exit from the Knicks, NOT MElo.. but let facts come in the way of some good old fashioned emotional posting. This is the part I just don't get - Lin came up with this contract? Instead he came up with a surprise signed poison pill contract days later. Why did Houston offer the exact same deal to Asik at the exact same time? Lin didn't come up with the deal, Houston did, because they heard the noise that the Knicks were going to match the 3yr $19M deal. Lin was never presented an offer sheet for 3yr $19M from Houston. He told the Knicks what the Rockets were offering, the Knicks told him they'd match, that story leaked to the papers, Houston upped their offer - the only offer sheet presented to Lin had the poison pill third year. Lin didn't "make" Houston add a third year. That's absurd. If he did, why did Houston offer the same contract to Asik? I think it's true the poison pill angered Dolan. But I also think it's true that Melo didn't want him back at that level. And I remember Kidd's words well about Lin. I think he would've been a great mentor for Lin. The whole thing is a shame. ¿ △ ?
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
6/1/2016 10:00 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:I reread the article. I missed the source that the writer cited.newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:fishmike wrote:Lin's quest for $$$ facilitated his exit from the Knicks, NOT MElo.. but let facts come in the way of some good old fashioned emotional posting. Fair - I mean, it's all conjecture. I think the reason Grunwald was hiding was that Dolan was furious and probably told Grunwald to tell Lin to go **** himself and Grunwald was trying to wait for Dolan to calm down a little. But again, just my conjecture. We also do know for a fact that Grunwald was arranging a trade for Felton at that time, so that may have been what he was doing. The Knicks do so much **** that makes so little sense all we're left with is trying to assemble theories from the little non-sensical snippets we get. Whatever the case, a story came out that seemed to jibe with what a lot of us saw on the floor - Melo was not comfortable with Lin. He didn't like being scapegoated for that team struggling (including by MDA himself), he didn't like Lin getting credit for turning the season around, he didn't like how Lin was the good guy and Melo was the bad guy. I don't really blame Melo - the response to Lin was ridiculous. I wish it'd been a little less insane - it just happened to happen during a dry spell in the sports calendar - right after the super bowl, right before march madness and spring training. There wasn't much else going on in sports and all the sudden the media made a sensation out of a promising young point guard. It was ridiculous. Anyway, whatever, it's old news now. But I think if Melo had wanted Lin back and advocated for it, the Knicks would've signed him. I think the poison pill angered Dolan. I think Melo's view point of Lin influenced their commitment to bringing him back, too. ¿ △ ?
|
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29864 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
6/1/2016 11:05 AM
crzymdups wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:I reread the article. I missed the source that the writer cited.newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:fishmike wrote:Lin's quest for $$$ facilitated his exit from the Knicks, NOT MElo.. but let facts come in the way of some good old fashioned emotional posting. I could agree with that if Melo demanded that Lin be kept then they probably would have made that happen. That's a lot more reasonable. Though is it really Melo's personality to do so? Wonder if he also was under the impression the Lin was screwing over the Knicks with that poison pill. If Dolan felt that way was this the thinking accross the Knicks club. Who knows. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
fishmike
Posts: 53136 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
6/1/2016 12:04 PM
crzymdups wrote:I am sure there is something behind those last points. There are lots of influences in motion. At the end of the day Lin was not worth that contract, it was a bad contract and the Knick did the right thing in not signing him. Lin put up decent numbers over those 3 years but really was not an impact player, and he was certainly a polarizing figure. If you need any convincing of Lin's value he was literally traded WITH a pick (Rockets acquired a Clippers pick) for nothing (rights to Sergei Lishchuk). Rockets said just take him, and here's a pick for doing so. Some perspective.newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:I reread the article. I missed the source that the writer cited.newyorknewyork wrote:crzymdups wrote:fishmike wrote:Lin's quest for $$$ facilitated his exit from the Knicks, NOT MElo.. but let facts come in the way of some good old fashioned emotional posting. Which brings us back full circle to the topic starter, and Brigg's fascination (he's long since stopped reading this thread I am sure) with Crabbe and overpaying other RFAs. Bottom line? Its a crappy idea, doesn't work out and his title "For perspective Jeremy Lin" is indeed perspective on that topic indeed. The perspective is another team lured an RFA away with a bad contract and it didn't work. That player was traded with a pick for nothing before finishing that contract, and that player's next contract was a bottom dwellers veteran minimum type deal. Lesson learned right Briggs? "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|