crzymdups wrote:Woodson was a very good coach.

That's why he can't hold a head coaching job and will spend most of his career as a assistant.

Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.

Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.

StarksEwing1 wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.

Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.

Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.

i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions

Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.

ChuckBuck wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.

Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.

Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.

i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions

Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.

What's the point of making fun of an average to mediocre coach that got shyt canned by a dysfunctional organization in the Knicks? Is that supposed to prop us up or something, because really it's the opposite effect.

Don't know he hasn't replied in the thread he created yet. But the odds are very high that he randomly stumbled on the Mike Woodson news through one of the various blogs he follows. Then felt the desire to crack a light hearted joke about the news he stumbled on. Which would make sense of him not really engaging in the thread afterward. As he never really took it seriously.

Woodson also wasn't **** canned. His contract expired and Phil didnt retain him probably due to desiring Kerr.

ChuckBuck wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.

Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.

Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.

i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions

Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.

What's the point of making fun of an average to mediocre coach that got shyt canned by a dysfunctional organization in the Knicks? Is that supposed to prop us up or something, because really it's the opposite effect.

Don't know he hasn't replied in the thread he created yet. But the odds are very high that he randomly stumbled on the Mike Woodson news through one of the various blogs he follows. Then felt the desire to crack a light hearted joke about the news he stumbled on. Which would make sense of him not really engaging in the thread afterward. As he never really took it seriously.

Woodson also wasn't **** canned. His contract expired and Phil didnt retain him probably due to desiring Kerr.

Says **** canned right here. There was no expiration, it was a "see ya later, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out" type ordeal.

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nba/story/_/id/10815529/mike-woodson-fired-new-york-knicks-coach

Yea your right he had one more year. Though he was let go for the same reasons that Thibbs won't be brought in.