[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What would it take to get Ty
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/29/2004  6:15 PM
Can the Knicks get Ty Chandler and Jamal from Chicago? I'd gladly throw in one 1st round pick and replace Moochi with Othella or even Shandon with Othella so that we're giving them only one bad contract and still take back E-Rob and JYD. How badly do they want to keep Ty? I would NOT give up Marbury or Sweetney to get Ty Chandler, though
AUTOADVERT
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
7/29/2004  6:51 PM
I'm not sure why the Bulls would want to get rid of Chandler. But if they do we'd most likely have to ship back a good big man. Maybe KT or Mohammed or something like that. But I dout they want to do such a deal at all.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/29/2004  7:07 PM
Chandler is definitely not an "untouchable" on that team so we could have a shot at getting him. However, we would have to kiss all of our trade bait goodbye and Nazr Mohammed would definitely have to be included. I like Tyson but he always seems to be injured. I would pass on getting him unless we could get him cheap.

[Edited by - s3231 on 07/29/2004 19:09:23]
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
TLover
Posts: 21065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
7/29/2004  7:09 PM
If the knicks included Sweetney they may be able to get either Chandler or Curry. I would prefer Curry but I think Chicago would trade Tyson before Curry.

s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/29/2004  10:01 PM
There is no way the Bulls will trade Curry unless he has another underachieving season. He is as close to "untouchable" as you can get on that roster.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/29/2004  10:42 PM
I would give up our trade bait to get craw and chandler, we get a SG and a big man, and chandler is that camby type player and probably with more upside, we can let sweetney play the post and chandler can get blocks from the weakside, we would have no reason to overpay dampier that friggin bum after this trade, I am all for it..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
MaTT4281
Posts: 34873
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
7/29/2004  11:06 PM
Does Chandler play any 5? I know Curry plays center for the bulls, but Tyson is 7-1. I haven't seen him play much, but the few times I have, I've liked what I've seen. We may be able to use him at the 5 instead of Damp (who remains a mystery as to whether we can get him).
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  12:20 AM
To get Chandler and Crawford, I would give up a lot. I would give up every expiring contract including Deke, Othella, Trybanski. I would take back E-Rob and JYD and not include Moochie Norris. In addition, I would give them either 1) Tim Thomas, 2) Frank Williams, Shandon, and Nazr or 3) Frank, Shandon and Kurt to get Chandler.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  12:36 AM
I would even do a Frank, Sweetney, Deke, Trybanski, Othella and Shandon for Crawford and Chandler and E-Rob.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/30/2004  1:30 AM
If Ty didn't have back problems, I would be willing to at least consider giving up Sweetney to get him. But because of Ty's back problems, I'm wouldn't even contemplate giving up Sweetney to get him
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  1:58 AM
If Tyson didn't have back problems, there would be no one we could offer to get him. Before he wiped out, he was putting up 15 and 12, give or take. He's 7-1 and 21 years old and jumps higher than the stock market after a couple of red bulls. With his offensive game developing, he is potential superstar material. In my opinion, he's going to be better than Sweetney.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
7/30/2004  3:11 AM
Posted by codeunknown:

In my opinion, he's going to be better than Sweetney.

Provided he can still play in 2 years.
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  11:28 AM
What's happening in 2 years?
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/30/2004  11:42 AM
Posted by codeunknown:

What's happening in 2 years?
I think what's NOT happenning in two years is the issue (not what IS happenning). It's a legitimate concern that in 2 years his back could still be interfering with his game and he might NOT be able to even play

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07/30/2004 11:48:14]
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
7/30/2004  11:42 AM
Nothing. I just randomly picked the figure.

If it does disturb you, I can edit my post and replace it with 3 years.

Would that suit you better ?
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  12:02 PM
Posted by raven:


If it does disturb you, I can edit my post and replace it with 3 years.

Would that suit you better ?

Hehe, if you think Chandler's going to be playing golf in 3 years, I'd bet against you.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
7/30/2004  12:58 PM
I'll ask briggs before... pessimist as he is, if he says "less than 2 yrs", so I have a chance !
« Reply To Topic
What would it take to get Ty
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy