[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

what about keon clark ?
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/30/2004  11:50 AM
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by Bonn1997:


you can check that on any baketball web page.

The question was rhetorical.
Okay; I guess Raven and I didn't realize that and don't understand the point to the "rhetorical" question
AUTOADVERT
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  11:51 AM
Keon is ok as the last option for this summer as a decent role player. Id go after Gadzuric first.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  11:56 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:


Okay; I guess Raven and I didn't realize that and don't understand the point to the "rhetorical" question

Im not debating your understanding, yet. But, a sarcastic response to a rhetorical question is usually nonsensical - why would you tell me where to find the stats if its clear I already knew what they were.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
7/30/2004  12:56 PM
peace guys, we don't care after all, keon is a one legged weed smoker who never cared about us. We shouldn't sign people who didn't come when we needed them the most.

IN his case, 2 yrs ago.
Knicksfan
Posts: 32907
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/30/2004  1:23 PM
So look to get a young guy like Gads, if he is really a free agent.
Knicks_Fan
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/30/2004  2:47 PM
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by Bonn1997:


Okay; I guess Raven and I didn't realize that and don't understand the point to the "rhetorical" question

Im not debating your understanding, yet. But, a sarcastic response to a rhetorical question is usually nonsensical - why would you tell me where to find the stats if its clear I already knew what they were.
It wasn't a sarcastic response. BOTH Raven and I (and I suspect other readers too) had no idea that you were asking a rhetorical question and that is why both of us directly addressed the question. Usually there is a point to a rhetorical question and a reason why the question is not intended to be answered. Usually there's some kind of implication that FOLLOWS FROM the question without the question needing to be directly answered, which is why it's a rhetorical question. As I said earlier, your rhetorical question makes no sense because there is no implication that follows from it, which is why no one thought it was a rhetorical question.
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  4:03 PM
Actually, I think Raven understood the implication of the rhetorical question, that Clark's lack of injury is not surprising and not a testament to his durability since he doesn't play extended minutes. Think about it Bonn, the rheotrical question does have an implication. You are free to disagree with the argument (for example, maybe you think withstanding a 22-minute per game season makes him the NBA iron man), but that doesn't mean that the method of argumentation doesn't make sense.

If you couldn't understand that my question was rhetorical, that was the point of my original clarification. If you knew it was rhetorical, your response to that reeked of sarcasm that was disjointed and incoherent.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/30/2004  5:55 PM
all right; this is silly. You had a rhetorical question. We didn't realize it. No big deal
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2004  6:01 PM
Agreed. But, still, say no to Keon until Gadzuriz is out of reach.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/30/2004  7:58 PM
Posted by codeunknown:

Agreed. But, still, say no to Keon until Gadzuriz is out of reach.

I think a *fully recovered* Keon Clark is better than Gadzuric. I'd be happy to add either though. If I were Isiah, I'd try to arrange for Clark to be evaluated by team doctors ASAP

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07/30/2004 19:59:26]
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
7/31/2004  2:02 AM
Posted by codeunknown:

Actually, I think Raven understood the implication of the rhetorical question,

Sorry to tell you that I don't even understand the word "rhetorical " !

But from what understood, I also think that it's easier to play in many games when you don't have to play a lot in each of them.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/3/2004  5:30 PM
http://www.nypost.com/sports/knicks/26112.htm

The Knicks will return to Charleston for training camp after a year hiatus. Their first practice is Oct. 5 ... Thomas tried trading for Rodney White last season and has interest in signing him for part of the mid-level exception. But because he hasn't made any moves, the Knicks still have logjam at swingman and White is leaning toward the Kings, a Denver newspaper reported. Thomas also is considering oft-troubled Keon Clark, pending the Erick Dampier/Jamal Crawford deals.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
what about keon clark ?

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy