[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Roster spots next year??
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/15/2016  4:17 PM
C-Lopez
4 Carmelo
GF
G
G
6th man KP
FC Kyle Oquinn
G Galloway?
G Jerian Grant
G Last year of Jose Calderon

C
F
G
G
G

Derrick Williams--unknown free agent
Aaron Affalo--unknown free agent
Lance Thomas unknown free agent
Gone Sasha Seraphin Early? Admundson


This is why I say we need to trade Carmelo and rebuild. I dont see us doing much more than this year--we have way to many question marks I cant even come close to filling out the roster--so exactly how do you win that way with no draft picks and what amounts to the 20 position cash wise in free agency?

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/15/2016  4:29 PM
Sixth Man KP.

Oh, Briggs.

¿ △ ?
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/15/2016  4:31 PM
BRIGGS wrote:C-Lopez
4 Carmelo
GF
G
G
6th man KP
FC Kyle Oquinn
G Galloway?
G Jerian Grant
G Last year of Jose Calderon

C
F
G
G
G

Derrick Williams--unknown free agent
Aaron Affalo--unknown free agent
Lance Thomas unknown free agent
Gone Sasha Seraphin Early? Admundson


This is why I say we need to trade Carmelo and rebuild. I dont see us doing much more than this year--we have way to many question marks I cant even come close to filling out the roster--so exactly how do you win that way with no draft picks and what amounts to the 20 position cash wise in free agency?

you said that? When?!?!?!
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/15/2016  4:40 PM
Our sixth man is gonna be off the hook next year!

¿ △ ?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/15/2016  4:45 PM
crzymdups wrote:Our sixth man is gonna be off the hook next year!

that was a funny line. Nice dig at our dinosaurs.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

3/15/2016  5:51 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/15/2016  5:52 PM
Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/15/2016  5:55 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

hate away? love these posts.

KP should post up and spot up. He should take advantage of any mismatch that he has during that game and take shots from any are that is deemed efficient for him.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

3/15/2016  6:00 PM
mreinman wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

hate away? love these posts.

KP should post up and spot up. He should take advantage of any mismatch that he has during that game and take shots from any are that is deemed efficient for him.

did you ever look at the PnR stats?

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/15/2016  6:21 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

hate away? love these posts.

KP should post up and spot up. He should take advantage of any mismatch that he has during that game and take shots from any are that is deemed efficient for him.

did you ever look at the PnR stats?

I have not searched yet. Did you find them?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/15/2016  6:21 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

The Boston Celtics used to bring in Kevin Mchale for chemistry reasons off the bench and they won championships that way. I DO NOT think KP Lopez and Carmelo is an effective defensive team in transition and it wont get better. A way to get around that is to bring KP off the bench so we can keep 2 of the 3 in there most of the game.

After that--Ive heard no one tell me about roughly 10 roster spots that have no name next to them.

RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/15/2016  6:30 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

The Boston Celtics used to bring in Kevin Mchale for chemistry reasons off the bench and they won championships that way. I DO NOT think KP Lopez and Carmelo is an effective defensive team in transition and it wont get better. A way to get around that is to bring KP off the bench so we can keep 2 of the 3 in there most of the game.

After that--Ive heard no one tell me about roughly 10 roster spots that have no name next to them.

I think Galloway, Lance Thomas, Derrick Williams will be back. I think we sign two mid-tier guards, say Brandon Jennings and Nic Batum if we're feeling dreamy.

PG: Jennings, Grant, Wroten
SG: Batum, Galloway
SF: Melo, Lance, Early
PF: KP, DWill
C: Rolo, Hernangomez, KOQ

I count 13 there.

¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/15/2016  6:45 PM
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

The Boston Celtics used to bring in Kevin Mchale for chemistry reasons off the bench and they won championships that way. I DO NOT think KP Lopez and Carmelo is an effective defensive team in transition and it wont get better. A way to get around that is to bring KP off the bench so we can keep 2 of the 3 in there most of the game.

After that--Ive heard no one tell me about roughly 10 roster spots that have no name next to them.

I think Galloway, Lance Thomas, Derrick Williams will be back. I think we sign two mid-tier guards, say Brandon Jennings and Nic Batum if we're feeling dreamy.

PG: Jennings, Grant, Wroten
SG: Batum, Galloway
SF: Melo, Lance, Early
PF: KP, DWill
C: Rolo, Hernangomez, KOQ

I count 13 there.

No way we have the cash for that.

RIP Crushalot😞
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

3/15/2016  6:56 PM
mreinman wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

hate away? love these posts.

KP should post up and spot up. He should take advantage of any mismatch that he has during that game and take shots from any are that is deemed efficient for him.

did you ever look at the PnR stats?

I have not searched yet. Did you find them?

Yeah I posted it in the other thread.

Players

http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive

Teams

http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=team&OD=offensive


Go to NBA stats then look up play types.

NBA.com upgrade of stats over the last few years have been awesome.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/15/2016  7:04 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

hate away? love these posts.

KP should post up and spot up. He should take advantage of any mismatch that he has during that game and take shots from any are that is deemed efficient for him.

did you ever look at the PnR stats?

I have not searched yet. Did you find them?

Yeah I posted it in the other thread.

Players

http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive

Teams

http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=team&OD=offensive


Go to NBA stats then look up play types.

NBA.com upgrade of stats over the last few years have been awesome.

yeah ... just saw this a few minutes ago now that you got me searching but the data like everything else on the site is so confusing and poorly organized / designed.

I sorted by team and then freq and of course the knicks were dead last but I am still not sure about the data and how it is presented.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

3/15/2016  8:15 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

The Boston Celtics used to bring in Kevin Mchale for chemistry reasons off the bench and they won championships that way. I DO NOT think KP Lopez and Carmelo is an effective defensive team in transition and it wont get better. A way to get around that is to bring KP off the bench so we can keep 2 of the 3 in there most of the game.

After that--Ive heard no one tell me about roughly 10 roster spots that have no name next to them.


Briggs, I was not addressing your post. I am open to changing the starting lineup. I understand why you want a change. Quicker, better more versatile lineups. I get it.

What I was referring to was the video showing Porzingis making a ridiculous shot from near the entrance. That's good and all, but the statistics(even his raw 3 ball percentage isn't too great) show he's a good shooter but not a great one. People want him to become the next Curry or Dirk, but the raw stats so far show that he isn't that type of shooter. I think the coaches and Phil have understood his strengths much better. They see a guy that can get the 3 ball or outside jumpshot anytime he wants and he should take them. However his game should go way beyond that. Post ups. Cuts. Drives. All good for him as he has an advantage in length and size. If we play him at 4, he has arguably the biggest mismatch on most nights in the paint.

He's going to take some time, but it'll come together for him. Look forward to seeing where his game is in 2 years from today.

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
3/15/2016  9:27 PM
they should be trying to pry evan turner away from the celtics to replace afflalo. that's a big upgrade.

i'd also go after horford and fournier.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
martin
Posts: 80099
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/15/2016  9:54 PM
dk7th wrote:they should be trying to pry evan turner away from the celtics to replace afflalo. that's a big upgrade.

i'd also go after horford and fournier.

I think Evans would be a good replacement for DWill.

Horford though? Rather spend $ on wings?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

3/15/2016  10:00 PM
dk7th wrote:they should be trying to pry evan turner away from the celtics to replace afflalo. that's a big upgrade.

i'd also go after horford and fournier.

I love Horford but he's no spring chicken and the two injury history may portend a rapid decline. Which would be a shame he is a criminally underrated center who is perfect for the modern NBA (not like that matters on the triangle loving Knicks--but whatever I'm sure he'd be great wherever he plays).

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/15/2016  10:42 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis scores at 0.82 points per possession on post ups and that's without any significant strength or history of being a post up player (it's still coming).
His spot ups are 0.78 points per possessions.

I know it's easy to just hate for the sake of hating but the facts and stats show Porzingis has been just as good in post ups (slightly better actually) as he has been in jumpshot/spot ups.

There was also a statistic in an article showing that on the right block KP's points per possession is over 1 on post ups, which is insanely good.

Again hate away, without facts.

The Boston Celtics used to bring in Kevin Mchale for chemistry reasons off the bench and they won championships that way. I DO NOT think KP Lopez and Carmelo is an effective defensive team in transition and it wont get better. A way to get around that is to bring KP off the bench so we can keep 2 of the 3 in there most of the game.

After that--Ive heard no one tell me about roughly 10 roster spots that have no name next to them.

I think Galloway, Lance Thomas, Derrick Williams will be back. I think we sign two mid-tier guards, say Brandon Jennings and Nic Batum if we're feeling dreamy.

PG: Jennings, Grant, Wroten
SG: Batum, Galloway
SF: Melo, Lance, Early
PF: KP, DWill
C: Rolo, Hernangomez, KOQ

I count 13 there.

No way we have the cash for that.

We don't re-sign Afflalo and we stretch Calderon, cap estimate is $95M now - that gives us $36M in cap room. $12M Jennings, $15M Batum, $3M Hernangomez, we can go over the cap to sign Lance, DWill and Galloway.

¿ △ ?
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
3/15/2016  10:51 PM
martin wrote:
dk7th wrote:they should be trying to pry evan turner away from the celtics to replace afflalo. that's a big upgrade.

i'd also go after horford and fournier.

I think Evans would be a good replacement for DWill.

Horford though? Rather spend $ on wings?

for me it's about defensive length, a willingness to pass the ball, and depth. i wouldn't expect him to play more than 24-28 minutes a game. he is an excellent defender according to drpm and his usage to assist ratio is elite. perfect triangle player.

the knicks acquire turner and horford it would be a HUGE offseason. in fact i'm going to make it my sig right now.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
Roster spots next year??

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy