You answered my questions only when I called you out on it. And then you edited a previous post to make it appear as if you had answered them. So, yea, the fact that you don't answer questions in a timely manner does irk me. But, hey, as long as you answer them, you can take your sweet time.
Ok, first of all that answer to your initial question was up there long before you ever "called me out" on anything. Why else would I be puzzled as to why you were still asking for an answer when I felt I had already given you one?
I really do appreciate you letting me take my sweet time to answer questions instead of forcing me to answer them according to your schedule.
I said my method of "rebuilding" through trading economic assets ensures a more competitive team in the short-term than a crash and rebuild strategy. How is that not guaranteed?
Actually what you said was:
"Being a very competitive, entertaining team is ensured by my method."
Like I said, you can't possibly ensure that with any method of rebuilding. If you want to change it to the other statement then I agree with you, obviously if you're going to be more competitive in the short term with a mediocre team than a team that's looking to build from the ground up.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
7/28/2004 11:45 AM
