Good thread!
i would be a fan of keeping all the arguments for/against Fisher to a thread like this and left out of the game-day threads. it's one thing to comment on a coaching decision you agree or disagree with, but then move on. A lot of the game-day threads are deteriorating into personal attacks, and very repetitive criticisms
For the record, I don't think Fisher is a bad coach. The issues he has to contend with are explained well in the original post. I also share the concern that he is not a great coach (and it's tough to win it all with less than a great coach, even with great players), and the concern that Fisher at times seems to be faulted for everything that doesn't work out perfectly.
To me, Phil's real challenge is what to do with Fisher. What happens if Fisher is merely good or above average? If Fisher stunk it would be easy for Phil to replace him. What if he's Mark Jackson -- great speeches and motivation but not the rest of the package.
The team has been very inconsistent. Some games they play SA and OKC extremely well; then they lose to the Nets. it's tough to identify if that's coach or team without getting into the details at times. Last night, for example, in a game they really needed, they lose at home to the Celts. Was that the coach or players? Yes players missed shots, blew assignments etc. However, it's also the truth that Orlando beat the Celts the game before by packing the paint and forcing the Celts to beat them from outside with their woeful outside shooting. (Celts took the most 3 pointers in a game this season and lost.) Yet, when we play them that puny lineup smoked us with points in the paint: 58-28. What gives? Do we not scout opposing teams? Do we not develop a game plan based on recent scouting reports? Regardless, as we're getting smoked in the paint, we keep our longest most agile defender on the bench?? it's tough not to fault the coaching staff for some of that.
And while there's a certain logic to saying the Knicks have limited number of good/very good players, e.g., Melo, KP maybe Rolo, and then a bunch of bench players, consider the Celts. They're the epitome of that characterization and worse. Their best player is a 5'9" point guard and then the rest of the entire team easily could be starters or bench players for any number of other teams. They're certainly not stars. Brad Stevens has been effective at using his team's depth and balance to his advantage and hiding the fact that their best interior player may be Sullinger! And their centers?!?
Maybe it's not a Fisher issue but a broader based bench issue. Maybe Fish needs his version of Tom Thibedou (sp?) or Tex Winters as his defensive coordinator and someone else for offense. It's been frustrating.
I think Fish has been more like Jerian Grant (tantalizing at times but???) and not like KP (where it's easy to live through his flubs because you know with confidence he's going to be special