[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

if Philly grabs Dampier
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/21/2004  11:34 AM
my suggestion is we sign Mihm to a 5 year 30mm$. the market is nuts but we are a SMALLISH team and if we are truly trying to compete then we need a 7 footer who can play and Mihm can play. Mihm can shoot the 12 footer plus he is much better than Doleac inside. That would give us

Mihm Nazr
KT Sweetney
Thomas Hardaway? Ariza?
Houston???? Andersen???
Marbury FW
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/21/2004  11:45 AM
you like mihm b/c he's white. ADMIT IT!!!!

we could get mihm, i'm not against it. but i ask you this, would you rather have mihm or split the MLE/LLE for vin and gadzuric?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/21/2004  12:06 PM
sounds about right. i like mihm because he's white although last year i wanted to trade doleac for rodney white hmmm...
RIP Crushalot😞
Knicksfan
Posts: 33474
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/21/2004  12:19 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

split the MLE/LLE for vin and gadzuric?

Knicks_Fan
Nalod
Posts: 71153
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/21/2004  12:22 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

you like mihm b/c he's white. ADMIT IT!!!!

we could get mihm, i'm not against it. but i ask you this, would you rather have mihm or split the MLE/LLE for vin and gadzuric?

We got to open roster spots. Black, WHite, REd and Yello, we don't got room to too many Fellow.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/21/2004  12:55 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

sounds about right. i like mihm because he's white although last year i wanted to trade doleac for rodney white hmmm...

rodney WHITE....i knew it, you like him too b/c he's WHITE!!!

in all seriousness, mihm is a decent for $15 mil but not $30.
fishmike
Posts: 53828
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/21/2004  1:06 PM
I hate Mihm... he's just not what we need. Yes we are smallish, but we are smallish because we dont have the Wallaces, Shaq, Jermaine Oneil, Kmart and Camby, Brad Miller, Duncan... you get the idea. Mihm makes us bigger only when you look at the rosters, but we need size that impacts a game. Dampier's size can impact a game. I would rather just stick with KT, Nazr and Deke at center and see if something better shows up at the trading deadline.

I have no doubt Sweetney will be a bigtime PF and break out in the next 2 years. He's 21. Lets concentrate on getting an athletic center to pair him with, not a stop gap stiff making $5mm a year for the next 4-5 years.

If the season started today I would put KT back at center because I think Nazr is a bench player (heck I think KT is also) and start Sweetney at PF. Give Sweetney the ball in the low post in the half court sets. He's already shown he wont force the action and he makes good passes. Yes we are smallish but this is the best course moving forward. It boosts KTs value and numbers and gives Sweetney playing time at PF. Nazr is a nice piece but he's not fooling anyone into believing he's a starting center in the league. Most of all it put guys with complimenting skills on the floor. Sweetney is back to the basket. KT is mid range jumper. TT is an athletic guy that can run and score from anywhere. Houston is the shooter and Marbury can create.

The only downside to this is listening to Briggs say we are a rag-tag group for the next 6 months but the truth is we are rebuilding and working on putting ourselves in a position to compete for a title. That means NOT massing players like Mihm w/ 5 year deals. It means collecting players like Othella/Deke/TSki this year and Penny and TT next year so we can trade for players like Rahim and Ratliff in Feb.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
7/21/2004  1:46 PM
I'd rather add nobody then add another soft horrible defender. If we have to get stuck with the mediocre team we got so far, then be it, we'll just have to wate till 07 to enjoy winning basketball. Picking up garbage players like Mihm for long term deals is not gonna do anything for us. He is no Dampier or Craw.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
Knicksfan
Posts: 33474
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/21/2004  1:49 PM
Bring Gadz with part of the MLE, for cheap.
Knicks_Fan
BigRedDog
Posts: 22192
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #569
7/21/2004  1:51 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

my suggestion is we sign Mihm to a 5 year 30mm$. the market is nuts

This does NOT make sense. Because the market is nuts you want us to overpay some slug for 5 yrs. Lets acquire good talent instead of panicking.
fishmike 9/27/2024 11:00 PM Ug I hate this. The idea of Towns is great until you see what a pussy he is. Jules is a dog. DD was a flamethrower locked up cheap for 3 more years. First Leon move I hate
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/21/2004  1:55 PM
we have a 100mm$ payroll. giving mihm 5mm per year would be 1/20th of that output. Mihm is better than Doleac who couldve taken 4 mm a year from New Orleans. The market is absurd, but 5mm per year for a 24 year old 7 footer with skills who can run the floor--whoose potential IMHO has NOT even been close to reached yet is worthy of the cash from a team with absolutely no true C other than 45 year old Deke. Yes Id rather have Dampier for the MLE, but if that cant happen, I have no problem slightly overpaying Mihm. We have 0 guarantee we will get a 7 footer on to this roster any time soon. Mihm is 24--so you pay a little extra and add a year. Id rather have Mihm for 5mm a year at C than Walker for who knows how much he wants for a contract next year playing a position i want sweetney to get 35+minutes at? I would take Gadzuric as well, but id pay him a tad less---something of the 4 years 16mm ilk.


Gadzuric or Mihm --im fine with either one. If one is making 4mm per and the opther is making 5mm per---they are easy to move if need be. Its the 6 year 55mm$ deals that are hard to move.
RIP Crushalot😞
Knicksfan
Posts: 33474
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/21/2004  2:04 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

we have a 100mm$ payroll. giving mihm 5mm per year would be 1/20th of that output. Mihm is better than Doleac who couldve taken 4 mm a year from New Orleans. The market is absurd, but 5mm per year for a 24 year old 7 footer with skills who can run the floor--whoose potential IMHO has NOT even been close to reached yet is worthy of the cash from a team with absolutely no true C other than 45 year old Deke. Yes Id rather have Dampier for the MLE, but if that cant happen, I have no problem slightly overpaying Mihm. We have 0 guarantee we will get a 7 footer on to this roster any time soon. Mihm is 24--so you pay a little extra and add a year. Id rather have Mihm for 5mm a year at C than Walker for who knows how much he wants for a contract next year playing a position i want sweetney to get 35+minutes at? I would take Gadzuric as well, but id pay him a tad less---something of the 4 years 16mm ilk.


Gadzuric or Mihm --im fine with either one. If one is making 4mm per and the opther is making 5mm per---they are easy to move if need be. Its the 6 year 55mm$ deals that are hard to move.

I don't argue with that of getting Mihm or Gadz, but your contracts are too much. It would be like following the crazy market. Not all, but some players have been signed for their actual value or for less. If you can get Mihm og Gadz, fine, but don't overpay for them when you can get them for cheap. A 5 year 30mill contract to Mihm would be a mistake. You can get him cheaper. Same with Gadz. If someone offers them more and overpays them, fine, thats their problem, but lets not fall on this crazy market. We may end up having a 100 mill payroll, but that doesn't justifies bringing more bad contracts.
Knicks_Fan
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/21/2004  2:23 PM
fish, good post and normally I would agree with you but I have to go with briggs here( I can't believe I am saying that) but mihm is a young player who still has a lot of upside, lets be real, dampier is not putting fear in any teams heart. I think that mihm will give us the size and athleticsm for a much cheaper price, he can hit the mid range jumper and would be a nice fit with out unit. I just can't see giving dampier 6 years and 65 mil, that is damn crazy...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
fishmike
Posts: 53828
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/21/2004  2:26 PM
Briggs, my man and poster boy for rebuilding... Answer me this: Does Mihm get us closer to winning a title? Does Mihm give us a piece or added flexibility that we can use to get us another player that will bring us closer to a title? Does Mihm represent a player that has shown potential to clearly be something more than he is now?

I cant say yes to any of these. Saying he's better than Doleac is about as good an edorsement as I can agree with. we have a 100mm payroll because over the 5 years management has paid marginal players $5-$6 mill a year for just showing up. Arent you the one thats said at some point the cycle has to break? What does Mihm give us? 2 wins? How many of our 82 games next year will you say "Mihm was the difference maker?"

If you want Mihm just trade a couple expiring deals for Calvin Booth or Tony Battie. What player to you want to leave off the roster to make room for Mihm? Ariza? Dermaar?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53828
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/21/2004  2:33 PM
only problem is Mihm is getting worse, not better. In 5 years he's been EXACTLY the same player 7 points, 5 boards and about 1 block. Do you guys really see seomthing I dont? If you do tell me... honestly I have probably seen him 8 play times or so. He wasnt a player I exactly stopped flipping channels to watch play.

What do you think his upside is? I think of Swift and Dalembert when I think of upside. I think of Doleac and Mihm when I think of stop gap, fill a roster hole (by the way our roster has 12 guys w/o DJ or Ariza).

Talk to me fellas... I dont see it, but if you have seen something you liked tell me.

One thing on Doleac... I did see something I liked. He came into camp last year stronger, leaner and with another 3-4 foot range on his jumper. He was spry, quick and obviously worked to improve his game. That to me made him worth an extension (obviously never happened).
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/21/2004  2:48 PM
Posted by fishmike:

Briggs, my man and poster boy for rebuilding... Answer me this: Does Mihm get us closer to winning a title? Does Mihm give us a piece or added flexibility that we can use to get us another player that will bring us closer to a title? Does Mihm represent a player that has shown potential to clearly be something more than he is now?

I cant say yes to any of these. Saying he's better than Doleac is about as good an edorsement as I can agree with. we have a 100mm payroll because over the 5 years management has paid marginal players $5-$6 mill a year for just showing up. Arent you the one thats said at some point the cycle has to break? What does Mihm give us? 2 wins? How many of our 82 games next year will you say "Mihm was the difference maker?"

If you want Mihm just trade a couple expiring deals for Calvin Booth or Tony Battie. What player to you want to leave off the roster to make room for Mihm? Ariza? Dermaar?

good post, I didn't think about roster space, I surely don't want to kee Dermarr or Ariza off the roster for mihm. I see what you are saying about mihm but the same thing can be said for Dampier, the guy is a slug, he play when he felt like it, he felt like playing because it was a contract year, Do you think that Dampier is going to improve the knicks more than 5 games? I don't think so, not at all... If anything then, I rather stay put with this roster, if it meant overpaying dampier...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/21/2004  2:54 PM
I see what you are saying about mihm but the same thing can be said for Dampier, the guy is a slug, he play when he felt like it, he felt like playing because it was a contract year, Do you think that Dampier is going to improve the knicks more than 5 games? I don't think so, not at all...

i disagree. i think dampier is the difference between the knicks making a run at the playoffs to making a run deep into the playoffs. he's a piece that we don't have. a defensive center that opposing teams must respect.

now, is mihm better than nazr? i don't think so. is mihm better than vin baker? i don't think so. i'd rather have gadzuric. signing mihm to a 3 year $10 mil deal wouldn't kill us but anything more than that would hurt more than help.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/21/2004  3:00 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
I see what you are saying about mihm but the same thing can be said for Dampier, the guy is a slug, he play when he felt like it, he felt like playing because it was a contract year, Do you think that Dampier is going to improve the knicks more than 5 games? I don't think so, not at all...

i disagree. i think dampier is the difference between the knicks making a run at the playoffs to making a run deep into the playoffs. he's a piece that we don't have. a defensive center that opposing teams must respect.

now, is mihm better than nazr? i don't think so. is mihm better than vin baker? i don't think so. i'd rather have gadzuric. signing mihm to a 3 year $10 mil deal wouldn't kill us but anything more than that would hurt more than help.

well then let it be gadzurich, I will take that, but don't overpay dampier, lets take a look at this, Dampier had his best year as a pro arugably last year.. How much better were the warriors?
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
fishmike
Posts: 53828
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/21/2004  3:20 PM
lol... this is cool because the debate has come full circle and back to Damp. That debate is easy... if for 65mm you get the Dampier that blocked shots and domintated the boards its worth it. If you get a timid 10/8/1.5 player for 10mm a year its a collosal setback. The upside is such where a Dampier and a healthy Houston elevates us to a team that can compete with anyone in the East, including the Heat and Pacers.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Knicksfan
Posts: 33474
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/21/2004  3:40 PM
Posted by fishmike:

lol... this is cool because the debate has come full circle and back to Damp. That debate is easy... if for 65mm you get the Dampier that blocked shots and domintated the boards its worth it. If you get a timid 10/8/1.5 player for 10mm a year its a collosal setback. The upside is such where a Dampier and a healthy Houston elevates us to a team that can compete with anyone in the East, including the Heat and Pacers.

Exactly! As simple as that.
Knicks_Fan
if Philly grabs Dampier

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy