Malcolm wrote:I posted the following in another thread where it may not have been welcome, so I'm re-posting here.It's in support of Nixluva's comment that a fast break system is not the only system to run in today's NBA (which was in response to those who insist that the Triangle is "outdated" and that fast break and pick and roll are all that can work):
NBA Fast break efficiency rankings as of 12/31:
1 Golden State
2 Sacramento
3 Oklahoma City
4 Washington
5 Cleveland
6 Phoenix
7 Dallas
8 Denver
9 New Orleans
10 Miami
11 Chicago
12 Houston
13 Minnesota
14 Milwaukee
15 Indiana
16 LA Clippers
17 Portland
18 LA Lakers
19 Charlotte
20 Orlando
21 Boston
22 Detroit
23 Atlanta
24 Philadelphia
25 Memphis
26 New York
27 Toronto
28 Brooklyn
29 San Antonio
30 Utah
Notice, please, who is #29 . . .
san antonio's half-court execution is outstanding-- everyone is a willing if not great passer. it's not hard to see tex winters' values being put to good use there, ie "never dribble when a pass is available."
new york is still learning how to execute in the half court, and there are not enough willing passers in the rotation yet. afflalo is the main culprit here. still too much dribbling and not enough passing.
as to fast breaks, we'd have more if we could generate more steals. knicks are ranked dead last in steals.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%