crzymdups wrote:I think the Triangle is more the issue with the team than Fisher. Fisher has made some mistakes with the rotation, but overall I think he's been okay. The issue is with roster construction and how we play. That's all Phil.
The Triangle is all well and good, but it helps if you have Kobe or Jordan to say "ok eff the Triangle, I'm closing out this game."
I HATE this kind of take on the Triangle. for one thing it totally dismisses that fact that the teams were pretty efficient over the years running the triangle and that's not because they had Kobe or MJ break the offense and make something happen. Also they actually RAN PLAYS to close out many of their games which people seem to completely forget. They weren't really freelancing but perhaps people just completely forgot about those game winning plays.
You either have an efficient offense or you don't. Having one really great player does NOT make an entire offense efficient. That's not how it works. If the Triangle was a drag on efficiency and pace then it would've shown during the years Phil was in LA. I think they only slowed down based on the make up of the roster and couldn't sustain a faster pace. In 2008-09 and 2007-08 the Lakers were running a good pace and highly efficient offense.
Lakers 2010-11 Record: 57-25, Finished 1st in NBA Pacific Division
PTS/G: 101.5 (9th of 30) ▪ SRS: 6.01 (3rd of 30) ▪ Pace: 90.7 (21st of 30) ▪ Off Rtg: 111.0 (6th of 30)Lakers 2009-10 Record: 57-25, Finished 1st in NBA Pacific Division
PTS/G: 101.7 (12th of 30) ▪ SRS: 4.78 (5th of 30) ▪ Pace: 92.8 (14th of 30) ▪ Off Rtg: 108.8 (11th of 30)
Lakers 2008-09 Record: 65-17, Finished 1st in NBA Pacific Division
PTS/G: 106.9 (3rd of 30) ▪ SRS: 7.11 (3rd of 30) ▪ Pace: 94.3 (5th of 30) ▪ Off Rtg: 112.8 (3rd of 30)
Lakers 2007-08 Record: 57-25, Finished 1st in NBA Pacific Division
PTS/G: 108.6 (4th of 30) ▪ SRS: 7.34 (2nd of 30) ▪ Pace: 95.6 (6th of 30) ▪ Off Rtg: 113.0 (3rd of 30)