Knicks1969 wrote:After the Bargnani debacle, any GM who would choose to go with an unknown Euro player with the first pick of a draft would deserve to be fired. To me, this is not a debate to have. KP never dominate at any level; thus he was an unknown commodity
The questions was on the show was...
Whether KP would be the 1st pick in the draft if teams knew what they know now?
It is basically the redraft question on this site.
Towns did not dominate as a freshman...Russell's team did nothing in the tournament...Mudiay played 12 games in a non-D league...etc.
Does that make OK4 the clear choice for #1 prior to the draft according to you? We now know how he has responded to the pressure of being a rookie on a bad team.
We all had this kind of argument pre-draft, you and I both know this.
Why would you call a guy who had lottery promises LAST year before he pulled out, had received the Rising Star award given to the best young Euro player, and was scouted by all the high lottery teams, an unknown commodity?
I probably would have taken Towns prior to the draft, but much of the hesitation with KP was because so many felt it would take 2-4 years for him to develop. Is there anyone around who still feels this is true?
He was as ready as anyone, as it turns out, even more so. You can't discount the level of competition he faced, and the character and demeanor he developed as a young pro playing superior competition in a league with adults made him different than all of the American born players, and Mudiay, who played in a league that did require its players to play a complete game.
Very easy to make a case for picking him #1 at this moment.
Things might change...who knows, but with what Minny now knows, KP would have earned consideration for being picked #1...and there is no other way to look at this.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?