for 6 years i think, wierd considering thats not realli warriors weak point. they got nve and speedy claxton, might lead to knicks trade where we take nve.

that makes no sense.

Knicks have Marbury, need to get young and athletic, and have Frank backing up Marbury. Why NVE?

I feel bad for this franchise.

They let Arenas leave, then the next year they sign Fisher and Foyle for a combined $80 million?

What's the thinking? Mullin doesn't have a clue.

Yep, I get it, Fisher is better then Areans. You called it man.

Its strange from the player's standpoint. Fisher is more like a very good backup for a playoff team. Maybe he is just happy with the rings he got in LA and just wanted to ensure his future. Still, Fisher in a team like the Warriors is just odd.

I think with this signing we could work something out where Nick Van Exel and Kurt Thomas go to Dallas, Erick Dampier and Antonie Walker to the Knicks, Golden State getting expiring contracts, Muhammed and then Dallas and NY taking on some bad contracts. To do this though, we would have to use every piece that would be used in a Crawford deal. It adds up if Dallas takes Eshenmeyer, and GS takes Muhammed, Lattnear, Harrington, Trybanski, Mutombo. Why they would do that I dont know. We still in theory could send Shandon Anderson and Frank Williams to Chicago for Jamal Crawford and E Robinson, but we'd have to find a third team to take on Moochie Norris in exchange for an expiring contract to send to chicago, and also hope that pigs fly to a frozen hell. But you never know. If would all work if Golden State took Penny Hardaway along with Nazzy Muhammed, maybe plan to be low on the cap in 2006. But I dont think they want to think that far ahead, although they should.

Posted by BigSm00th:

that makes no sense.

Knicks have Marbury, need to get young and athletic, and have Frank backing up Marbury. Why NVE?

maybe NVE works as a part of a larger package for Dampier since Paxson seems to be hedging on trading us Jamal Crawford? i don't know.

you dont get it. they haev a payroll right now of 48mm with only 11 guys signed. no matter what they do--they HAVE to take back 8-9 mm in salary--and they arent going to do that. Why do they need expiring contracts? for what purpose--they have none. the knicks will only get dampier if he decides to take the MLE and give up the 5 years 50mm the hawks are offering.