i think we sould let frank go and let him get the role he deserve in the NBA(starter,six man).
we simply don't need him we have marbury,penny,(crawford),maybe moochy or barret .
marbury will get 40+ minutes per game most nights so we just need someone to be out there for 5-15 minutes at the point and for that we have penny,(crawford),moochy/barret and even ariza
i like penny as our sub point guard because he is big and can cause mismatches when he post up a rivel point guard.

The exact question should be :

should we trade FRank if we can get better ?

then the answer should be : yes !

Posted by raven:

The exact question should be :

should we trade FRank if we can get better ?

then the answer should be : yes !

Exactly! I don't think anyone would say, hey lets trade Willie, just for the sake of trading him. We saw great things in the playoffs from him, like toughness, something we lacked a lot as an unit. I would like to keep him, have a player like him on the team. But if we can upgrade the team a lot with a trade including him, then we have to make the team.

But I still like Willie a lot.

Thre is "tuna helper",

Frank is "trade Helper".

Frank is also going to be a restricted free agent next year. If Craw is coming, Franks minutes are gone.

Free "Willy and Frank".