knicks1248 wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:I still have NO idea how Jackson would use a guy like Jordan in his offense, and this is why I never thought we would even pursue him as a FA. Does he have some kind of offensive ability that has been totally hidden up to now?
Shaq could not hit from outside, but he had a strong game in the post...can the same be said about Jordan?
Thats the thing about most fans, the minute you talk about a player, your first thought is, how can this player impact the triangle with his skill set, but clearly phils first thought is, how can this player sure up our horrible defense. Notice he said D jordan was/is the best defensive center in the league. He brings up how the middle of our defense was a layup line.
when you bring in a player like rodman, are you thinking, how is he going to fit in the triangle, no your thinking, he can pass, defend, and rebound, and thats what winning is all about
Jordan's BB IQ is not in the same universe as Rodman's...Jordan has not been a good passer in the pros or college- has never gotten over 1APG, even in the extended minutes stats. Rodman was also a good player off the ball on the offensive end, and could cut to the basket well. Rodman knew his limitations, and he never wanted to be a focal point of an offense.
There is a reason why Doc limited his touches on offense, and I doubt if it only has to do with FT shooting.
Jordan is a Great defender and good rebounder (again...not in Rodman's class), but a liability in our offense, with limited passing and post-up scoring ability, IMO. Actually glad that we did not spend $20M/year on him, and if he really had the ability to be a focal point in an offense like we run, I expect SA would have tried to pick him up instead of Aldridge.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?