[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I don't know if Kyle Andersen will ever have a big role with Sa
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/12/2015  8:32 AM
But I think he could be great here.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
7/12/2015  8:56 AM
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.

agreed. he looks like a superior player to everyone i saw yesterday who is vying for a spot on the knicks roster. better than cleanthony early too!

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
meloanyk
Posts: 20768
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2013
Member: #5615
7/12/2015  9:52 AM
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.
Given Jax preferred tempo, he would fit but I think he is part of Spurs future plans and we have nothing to offer the Spurs for him anyway.
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843
7/12/2015  11:10 AM
meloanyk wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.
Given Jax preferred tempo, he would fit but I think he is part of Spurs future plans and we have nothing to offer the Spurs for him anyway.

I thought every team wanted Calderon, our most favorite trade piece!

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/12/2015  11:17 AM
WaltLongmire wrote:
meloanyk wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.
Given Jax preferred tempo, he would fit but I think he is part of Spurs future plans and we have nothing to offer the Spurs for him anyway.

I thought every team wanted Calderon, our most favorite trade piece!


I really like Andersen I'd trade the 2018 pick lotto restricted for him. I don't know if he'll have a role in da anytime soon but I think he could play pg here
RIP Crushalot😞
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39945
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
7/12/2015  11:22 AM
dk7th wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.

agreed. he looks like a superior player to everyone i saw yesterday who is vying for a spot on the knicks roster. better than cleanthony early too!


Yeah, but it was the first game he looked good this summer. He's looked outclassed athletically in every other game.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/12/2015  11:33 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/12/2015  11:35 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
dk7th wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.

agreed. he looks like a superior player to everyone i saw yesterday who is vying for a spot on the knicks roster. better than cleanthony early too!


Yeah, but it was the first game he looked good this summer. He's looked outclassed athletically in every other game.

Not a great athlete but is 6-9 230. I like how he plays and think he would be an awesome piece here. Hes an excellent rebounder lengthy defdner a great passer and if he continues to develops his outside shot could be an all star one day. His IQ is very high I mean I thought he was a lottery pick last year who just feel off the charts. If we were lucky enough to have a pick past 15 in 2018 I cant believe it would be superior to a developed Kyle Andersen.

RIP Crushalot😞
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816
7/12/2015  11:43 AM
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.

Really?? I think the kid has some serious skills and i can't see Pop not seeing it if fans can see it. I'd love for us to get him though.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816
7/12/2015  11:47 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
meloanyk wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.
Given Jax preferred tempo, he would fit but I think he is part of Spurs future plans and we have nothing to offer the Spurs for him anyway.

I thought every team wanted Calderon, our most favorite trade piece!


I really like Andersen I'd trade the 2018 pick lotto restricted for him. I don't know if he'll have a role in da anytime soon but I think he could play pg here

Wow you'd seriously give up our 2018 1st for him?? That's a tough call there without knowing where we'd be drafting in that draft. Hopefully we'll be a contending team by then and which would mean we'd be picking at the end of the 1st round but a lot of that will depend on how we do next year and if we can lure big name free agents to us.
callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234
7/12/2015  11:48 AM
jersey city native!!!

but yeah he does everything in matrix slow motion.

Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
7/12/2015  11:53 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/12/2015  11:54 AM
The kid that caught my eye was Simmons..Didn't shoot well but good defense and very athletic..Once he streaked down the lane and dunked over everyone...Heard he was just signed on Friday..
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2012
Member: #3997
7/12/2015  12:35 PM
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.

Trading for Kyle Anderson would cost a future asset, likely a draft asset. Since the Knicks don't have a 2nd rounder until the Rapture basically, I don't see how that helps the Knicks. Also Anderson will be walking into the Triangle, which the Spurs don't run, so he'd be essentially eating a developmental year here. By the time you might see results, or not, it could be the middle of his fourth year, meaning the Knicks got no real stretch out of the benefit of a young player playing on his rookie deal.

For him to get playing time, who gets the squeeze out of the rotation?

Cost too much, difficult fit, complications with long term upside. I like him as a NBA fan, but the risk heavy ends the reward potential here.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/12/2015  12:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/12/2015  12:40 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.

Trading for Kyle Anderson would cost a future asset, likely a draft asset. Since the Knicks don't have a 2nd rounder until the Rapture basically, I don't see how that helps the Knicks. Also Anderson will be walking into the Triangle, which the Spurs don't run, so he'd be essentially eating a developmental year here. By the time you might see results, or not, it could be the middle of his fourth year, meaning the Knicks got no real stretch out of the benefit of a young player playing on his rookie deal.

For him to get playing time, who gets the squeeze out of the rotation?

Cost too much, difficult fit, complications with long term upside. I like him as a NBA fan, but the risk heavy ends the reward potential here.


Where could he play? The question is where couldn't he play I think he can play 1-4even 5 small ball. So you think it would take Kyle Andersen 2 years to pick up the triangle. How about 2 workouts. Outside of melo he would be the most talented player on the team with kp
RIP Crushalot😞
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/12/2015  12:59 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:But I think he could be great here.

Trading for Kyle Anderson would cost a future asset, likely a draft asset. Since the Knicks don't have a 2nd rounder until the Rapture basically, I don't see how that helps the Knicks. Also Anderson will be walking into the Triangle, which the Spurs don't run, so he'd be essentially eating a developmental year here. By the time you might see results, or not, it could be the middle of his fourth year, meaning the Knicks got no real stretch out of the benefit of a young player playing on his rookie deal.

For him to get playing time, who gets the squeeze out of the rotation?

Cost too much, difficult fit, complications with long term upside. I like him as a NBA fan, but the risk heavy ends the reward potential here.


Where could he play? The question is where couldn't he play I think he can play 1-4even 5 small ball. So you think it would take Kyle Andersen 2 years to pick up the triangle. How about 2 workouts. Outside of melo he would be the most talented player on the team with kp

Just to make it clear even tho teams don't openly talk about it some teams use the Triangle. The Spurs in particular have used the Triangle for years within their offense. It's often goes by so quick that people don't perceive that they use it.

« Reply To Topic
I don't know if Kyle Andersen will ever have a big role with Sa
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy