[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

It's now down to only 3 big men ( Kristaps, Trey Lyles, and Kaminsky)
Author Thread
wh4t
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2015
Member: #6039
USA
6/22/2015  2:39 PM
I'm assuming most heard the news about Willie Trill. Kristaps just had a private workout for the Knicks today. It's only 3 big men to talk about.

Kristaps Porzingis has private workout with Knicks http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/kristaps-porzingis-private-workout-knicks-article-1.2266752

AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/22/2015  2:54 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2015  2:58 PM
I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection
RIP Crushalot😞
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/22/2015  3:20 PM
Said it for awhile...we will have an opportunity to take one of the following- OK4, Russell, or Porzingis.

When the smoke clears, if we stay at 4 we will get a guy who has been in the discussion as a top 3 pick.

Wonder if Phil did this because of any info he has about who the Lakers will take.

I assume he would get some kind of info from LA sources and call OK4 in, too.

This might narrow things down to Russell or Porzingis, but I would be totally stunned if Russell does not go at 3.

Win-Win situation, from where I'm looking in.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
wh4t
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2015
Member: #6039
USA
6/22/2015  3:27 PM
wh4t
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2015
Member: #6039
USA
6/22/2015  3:29 PM
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/22/2015  3:37 PM
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

There's no mystery with Kaminsky. You pretty much know what he can do and he'd likely be in the Pau role in this offense. KrisP may also be able to do that but he's got a lot more developing to do and they may not want to risk that he may never reach that full potential. Kaminsky is there now and you feel confident in how you can see him performing.

blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
6/22/2015  3:42 PM
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

+1

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
6/22/2015  3:44 PM
blkexec wrote:
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

+1

We have so many holes....at a minimum, we need more skilled players. Kaminsky fits that goal. He will play a Steve Novak role, with Melo and Monroe fighting over the paint.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/22/2015  3:46 PM
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

I like Kaminsky too but I believe we can trade down and get Frank and assets that equal a greater bang for the buck but taking Kristaps 4 is smart I think we control the draft by controlling him. We could simply trade back 1 slot need be

RIP Crushalot😞
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/22/2015  3:54 PM
blkexec wrote:
blkexec wrote:
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

+1

We have so many holes....at a minimum, we need more skilled players. Kaminsky fits that goal. He will play a Steve Novak role, with Melo and Monroe fighting over the paint.


I think Kaminsky is better than that.

If they are only looking for a Novak, then you take Porzingis and let him develop. I put them as the best two bigs in terms of shooting, but Porzingis is a better Novak than Kaminsky because he has the quicker release.

Kaminsky is a great passer and has some ability in the post, more so that the Latvian at this point. He's also worked on his agility and vertical game, which has always been the perceived weakness in his game.

If you want the more immediate impact from a player, you take Kaminsky if you go big, Winslow if you go small.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/22/2015  3:55 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

I like Kaminsky too but I believe we can trade down and get Frank and assets that equal a greater bang for the buck but taking Kristaps 4 is smart I think we control the draft by controlling him. We could simply trade back 1 slot need be

I agree. Need to take KrisPor at that spot (as sad as that sounds) and just trade him. He seems to be the only one with any real trade value at that spot right now.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/22/2015  3:56 PM
If we could do that rumored PHX trade for Bledsoe and 13, I would take Kaminsky at 13. Or maybe Kevin Looney.


Though I think that PHX trade was created by a random person asking Chad Ford a question in an ESPN chat and it is being treated like a legit rumor.

¿ △ ?
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/22/2015  4:07 PM
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

I like Kaminsky too but I believe we can trade down and get Frank and assets that equal a greater bang for the buck but taking Kristaps 4 is smart I think we control the draft by controlling him. We could simply trade back 1 slot need be

I agree. Need to take KrisPor at that spot (as sad as that sounds) and just trade him. He seems to be the only one with any real trade value at that spot right now.


I want him as a Knick, but even if Phil does not, he had to have this workout for setting up trade offers from other teams.

You know they will be flowing in as we get closer and closer to the draft.

I think there's more of a chance that we will have either OK4 or Porzingis drop to us, but more likely Porzingis.

Depends on whether LA feels that OK4 is their franchise center, or they surprise and take Russell.

I'm going on the assumption that Phil knows the Lakers might take OK4 or Russell, but not Porzingis, who also worked out for them, and that is why the Latvian was here today. Can't believe he would not have requested a workout with OK4 if he thought he would drop to 4.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/22/2015  4:10 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

I like Kaminsky too but I believe we can trade down and get Frank and assets that equal a greater bang for the buck but taking Kristaps 4 is smart I think we control the draft by controlling him. We could simply trade back 1 slot need be

I agree. Need to take KrisPor at that spot (as sad as that sounds) and just trade him. He seems to be the only one with any real trade value at that spot right now.


I want him as a Knick, but even if Phil does not, he had to have this workout for setting up trade offers from other teams.

You know they will be flowing in as we get closer and closer to the draft.

I think there's more of a chance that we will have either OK4 or Porzingis drop to us, but more likely Porzingis.

Depends on whether LA feels that OK4 is their franchise center, or they surprise and take Russell.

I'm going on the assumption that Phil knows the Lakers might take OK4 or Russell, but not Porzingis, who also worked out for them, and that is why the Latvian was here today. Can't believe he would not have requested a workout with OK4 if he thought he would drop to 4.

I am sure that they requested a workout with everyone.

Phil knows that Porzy will be there at 4. Everybody knows that. Very sad but very true.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
wh4t
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2015
Member: #6039
USA
6/22/2015  4:32 PM
nixluva wrote:There's no mystery with Kaminsky. You pretty much know what he can do and he'd likely be in the Pau role in this offense. KrisP may also be able to do that but he's got a lot more developing to do and they may not want to risk that he may never reach that full potential. Kaminsky is there now and you feel confident in how you can see him performing.

BRIGGS wrote:I like Kaminsky too but I believe we can trade down and get Frank and assets that equal a greater bang for the buck but taking Kristaps 4 is smart I think we control the draft by controlling him. We could simply trade back 1 slot need be

I can't make a proper assessment like everyone else about Kristaps due to me not seeing him play actual games. All i've seen were highlight and workout videos and that's not enough for me.

blkexec wrote:We have so many holes....at a minimum, we need more skilled players. Kaminsky fits that goal. He will play a Steve Novak role, with Melo and Monroe fighting over the paint.

Kaminsky is miles ahead of Novak. There's no comparison skill wise

WaltLongmire wrote:I think Kaminsky is better than that.

If they are only looking for a Novak, then you take Porzingis and let him develop. I put them as the best two bigs in terms of shooting, but Porzingis is a better Novak than Kaminsky because he has the quicker release.

Kaminsky is a great passer and has some ability in the post, more so that the Latvian at this point. He's also worked on his agility and vertical game, which has always been the perceived weakness in his game.

If you want the more immediate impact from a player, you take Kaminsky if you go big, Winslow if you go small.

yep, Kaminsky is still getting better

http://www.si.com/edge/2015/06/17/training-with-frank-kaminsky-wisconsin-nba-draft-2015

Training with Frank Kaminsky: The big man steps it up for the NBA draft

After coming up short in the 2015 NCAA Tournament, former Wisconsin Badgers power forward Frank Kaminsky trains with an advanced performance conditioning program to prepare for the NBA.

When NBA draft prospect Frank Kaminsky does single-leg Romanian deadlifts precisely eight times on each side, it's not because he has an affinity for central European fitness techniques. Kaminsky, the 22-year-old Wooden Award winner who led Wisconsin on an impressive Final Four run, goes through specified workouts like single-leg RDLs and split squat jumps because his biomechanic and performance data informs his trainers that the 240-pound seven-footer has room to improve on his vertical jumping ability.

With the influx of advanced sports technology and training centers such as P3 in Santa Barbara, Calif., where Kaminsky is preparing ahead of the draft later this month, players are able to hone in on specific aspects of their development like never before. After putting the player through initial testing, which included the use of force plates and a 10-camera 3D motion-analysis system, Kaminsky's trainers at P3 determined he was the most mobile big man they’d ever assessed, but also that he needed to improve his "knee extension acceleration, velocity and peak concentric force," all underlying factors that contribute to a player's jumping ability.

The next step for Kaminsky’s trainers was to create a specialized workout plan that addressed his specific needs. To improve his leaping ability, the Badgers star was put through workouts like the one featuring those single-leg RDLs. Then, three times per week, Kaminsky would be tested by doing countermovement jumps with the use of force plates. The results—his contraction time and flight time—would then be analyzed by P3’s trainers, to determine if their approach needed to be intensified or scaled back. As a result, for Kaminsky, every day in the gym has been different, and that’s by design.

“Everyone has their own individual workout plan, whether they’re trying to get you to jump higher, get more explosive, or improve lateral quickness and footwork,” says Kaminsky. “There’s a lot more science behind [the training].”
For Kaminsky, who will enter the draft as arguably the best shooter among big men in the 2015 class, working on things like his overall strength, stability and velocity extension are all about turning him into a well-rounded athlete who won't be as susceptible to injuries, but also to improve the specific aspects of his game that NBA scouts may have questions about as teams decide whom to select in the draft. Part of that process is understanding the proper way to recover from workouts, games, etc.

When Kaminsky was initially tested at P3, he had a vertical jump displacement of 23.5 inches, which ranked in the ninth percentile of NBA athletes who have been tested at P3. His final assessment showed a significant improvement in the approach vert (up four inches), squat jump (up three inches) and agility (.32 seconds faster).

​Now, the former Badgers star is looking to continue that improvement as he progresses to the next level. “On the court, you’ve got to work as hard as you can,” says Kaminsky. “Nothing’s handed to you. You have to go out and work for everything. That’s one thing I proved in college and I’ll continue to do in the NBA.”

Improving by Leaps and Bounds

A P3 trainer offers exercises to help you get off the floor

1. Medball Vert Chest Pass: Stand with feet shoulder-width apart, toes slightly turned out, and hold a medicine ball at chest level. In a relaxed, fluid motion, squat while flexing through the hips, knees and ankles and keeping the back flat. When your thighs are parallel to the ground, explode up. As you rise, extend your arms straight up and push the ball as high as possible. Do three sets of six.
2. Single Leg RDL: Balance on one leg, holding dumbbells at hip level. With balancing leg slightly bent, bend forward at hip until dumbbell is about a foot above the ground—keep back flat and abs engaged. Extend back up at the hip and return to starting position.
3. Split Squat Jump: Start standing, with one foot in front and one foot a few feet behind in a position to explode vertically. In a relaxed and stable fashion, lunge down and explode up, jumping as high as possible Jump into the air. Alternate your foot position in the air. Land on the balls of your feet, load and quickly jump back up as high as possible. Use your arms and shoulders to help with momentum.
4. Side Plank: Lie on side with elbow underneath body. Keeping body straight, raise onto elbow. Keep firm and neutral spine position and neck position, hips extended.

http://newsok.com/okc-thunder-age-is-nothing-but-a-number-to-national-college-player-of-the-year-potential-thunder-draft-target-frank-kaminsky/article/5428679

Q: What are your thoughts on this whole pre-draft process after accomplishing just about everything you could at the collegiate level?

A: It’s an interesting process. Now you’ve got to figure out what your strengths and weaknesses are at the next level. Work on them as hard as you can, at least until the draft. And then showcase what you’ve been working on in summer leagues.

It’s clear what your strengths are. Where do you think you need to improve?

I think I need to improve on the defensive end. It’s a whole different evil at the next level. You can get away with some deficiencies in college, but in the NBA you’ll be exposed. So I know I need to work on my body and get better.

Do you think there are any misconceptions about your game?

Not necessarily about my game. I think it’s how much the age factor plays a difference. I said it before, I’m 22 years old and I get treated like I’m 65 going into the NBA. It’s not necessarily that I’m young or old. It’s just I don’t think that age plays as big of a deal as some people think it does.

What player in the NBA would you compare your game to?

A few different people. I like to take things from people’s games. I like to take stuff from Dirk (Nowitzki), Tim Duncan, I like to watch Nikola Mirotic and what he does and how he was effective as a rookie. So just watching everyone.

Any idea on where you might be drafted? Do you have any expectations on it?

I have expectations. I want to go anywhere from five to 12…With where I hope to get drafted, I don’t ever really want to be considered a backup player. So I’m going to do whatever I can to make sure I fit somewhere and have a role on the team.

Why should an NBA team draft you?
Why should an NBA team draft me? That’s a really good question. Because I bring a lot of different things to the table. On the offensive end, I bring a versatile skill set. I can fit into systems. I can fit in with people. I feel like I have a good personality. And I’m committed to winning. If I’ve shown anything in my last two years in college it’s that I want to win. I have a winning attitude and I can bring that to the table.

Did you make a conscious effort to become a stretch big seeing how the game has evolved?

Not necessarily. That’s how I always played. I was a guard before I was tall. So I kind of just kept those skills with me, and it kind of just turns out that that was the right decision.

Are teams looking at you as more of a power forward or center?

I look at myself as more of a 4, at least initially in my NBA career. We’ll see what happens after that. But the way I feel right now, I feel like I could play the 4.

When you interview with teams, are coaches projecting how your ability to put the ball on the floor and pass will give you mismatch advantages?

Yeah, you know, it’s going to be different in the NBA. There’s a 35 second shot clock in college. There’s a 24 second shot clock in the NBA. So that first look you get that’s open (in the NBA) you got to let it go. There were a lot of times in college where I passed up a good shot to try to work for something better. In the NBA, you can’t necessarily do that. So if you’re passing the ball, moving the ball in the right spots and you get an open look you’ve got to take it. And I think that’s something I’m ready for.

You mentioned that you hear a lot of people buzzing about your defense. How often do you hear about it, and how do you maintain your confidence?

Well, in these interviews I’ve asked every team ‘What do you think I need to work on, and what’s your biggest concerns about me?’ Everyone’s been a little bit different, but they all have the same theme. So that just goes to show that I still have a lot to work on. Nobody’s perfect coming into the draft. There’s been a lot of people in draft history who have come in with a lot of question marks and been able to prove people wrong. So I want to be one of those people.

Is the common theme defense?

Defense and getting my body better.

Are you spending more time at the kitchen table or in the weight room as far as the weight?

Both. A little bit more time in the weight room here recently just trying to lift hard before the going gets tough…I’m sure once summer league hits the lifting will be a little bit lighter and more emphasis on nutrition.

Do you embrace the nickname “Frank the Tank?”

Yeah. I don’t really have a choice now, do I?

WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/22/2015  5:02 PM
mreinman wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

I like Kaminsky too but I believe we can trade down and get Frank and assets that equal a greater bang for the buck but taking Kristaps 4 is smart I think we control the draft by controlling him. We could simply trade back 1 slot need be

I agree. Need to take KrisPor at that spot (as sad as that sounds) and just trade him. He seems to be the only one with any real trade value at that spot right now.


I want him as a Knick, but even if Phil does not, he had to have this workout for setting up trade offers from other teams.

You know they will be flowing in as we get closer and closer to the draft.

I think there's more of a chance that we will have either OK4 or Porzingis drop to us, but more likely Porzingis.

Depends on whether LA feels that OK4 is their franchise center, or they surprise and take Russell.

I'm going on the assumption that Phil knows the Lakers might take OK4 or Russell, but not Porzingis, who also worked out for them, and that is why the Latvian was here today. Can't believe he would not have requested a workout with OK4 if he thought he would drop to 4.

I am sure that they requested a workout with everyone.

Phil knows that Porzy will be there at 4. Everybody knows that. Very sad but very true.


LA's decision will determine everything. They can still take Russell, and Philly might like Porzingis over OK4, especially if they think Embiid will come back, since he and OK4 play similar games.

To many variables in play. I still see things as fluid at this point, but you can be guaranteed that one out of Russell/OK4/Porzingis will be available at 4. What Phil does after that is up to him.

You might have the expected 3 going in the expected order, but that order can change, IMO.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/22/2015  5:05 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
mreinman wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
wh4t wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:I've always been in this camp. I've always favore a multi asset laden trade down where we get Kaminsky a high 2015 2nd 2016 #1 and a solid young vet. If we pick #4 Porzingis and we should take Porzingis no mater why even if w want to trade him. His value will rise after the selection

I'll rather take Kaminsky over Kristaps

I like Kaminsky too but I believe we can trade down and get Frank and assets that equal a greater bang for the buck but taking Kristaps 4 is smart I think we control the draft by controlling him. We could simply trade back 1 slot need be

I agree. Need to take KrisPor at that spot (as sad as that sounds) and just trade him. He seems to be the only one with any real trade value at that spot right now.


I want him as a Knick, but even if Phil does not, he had to have this workout for setting up trade offers from other teams.

You know they will be flowing in as we get closer and closer to the draft.

I think there's more of a chance that we will have either OK4 or Porzingis drop to us, but more likely Porzingis.

Depends on whether LA feels that OK4 is their franchise center, or they surprise and take Russell.

I'm going on the assumption that Phil knows the Lakers might take OK4 or Russell, but not Porzingis, who also worked out for them, and that is why the Latvian was here today. Can't believe he would not have requested a workout with OK4 if he thought he would drop to 4.

I am sure that they requested a workout with everyone.

Phil knows that Porzy will be there at 4. Everybody knows that. Very sad but very true.


LA's decision will determine everything. They can still take Russell, and Philly might like Porzingis over OK4, especially if they think Embiid will come back, since he and OK4 play similar games.

To many variables in play. I still see things as fluid at this point, but you can be guaranteed that one out of Russell/OK4/Porzingis will be available at 4. What Phil does after that is up to him.

You might have the expected 3 going in the expected order, but that order can change, IMO.

I hope that you are right (that it is still in play) but I would bet 1000 : 1 that the top three is set with the obvious

so here is what phil is thinking ....
jbeachboy
Posts: 20253
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2015
Member: #6050

6/22/2015  5:09 PM
trading down makes no sense
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/22/2015  5:27 PM
jbeachboy wrote:trading down makes no sense

k

so here is what phil is thinking ....
wh4t
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2015
Member: #6039
USA
6/22/2015  5:35 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2015  5:37 PM
http://www.lostlettermen.com/article/what-if-frank-kaminsky-was-european

How Scouts Would View Frank Kaminsky Differently If He Was European

By Jim Weber

One of the most intriguing parts of the 2015 NBA Draft is how Wisconsin’s Frank Kaminsky is seen as just a mid-first round pick despite being college basketball’s National Player of the Year on national runner-up Wisconsin while European big man Kris Porzingis is a potential top three pick after averaging 10 PPG on a bad Spanish pro team.

I won’t claim to be an expert on European big men or project Porzingis to be a bust; [size=4]his YouTube clips and draft profiles are like every other hyped European big man prospect before him: He moves well for a 7-footer, can finish in the lane, is a good passer and can shoot the 3-ball. And I get that scouts are basing their analysis on what a player will be instead of what he has done.[/size]

But I will say this: There is an undeniable European bias that makes white players born overseas overvalued compared to those born in the United States.

As Jason Kapono once put it, “I should have left UCLA after my freshman year, moved to Yugoslavia and changed my name to Jason Kaponovich, and I’d have been a first-round pick.”

Need proof of the “Euro bias”?

Look no further than Kaminsky’s teammate, Sam Dekker. He had a tremendous junior season at Wisconsin that included annihilating Arizona in the NCAA tournament, and is such a good defender he guarded none other than LeBron James at LBJ’s own skills academy last summer. And yet, Dekker was projected as a late first round draft pick until he killed his individual NBA workouts, as if scouts refused to believe Dekker’s game tape was real until they saw how good he is in person. Now he’s projected as a Top 10 selection.

Or take a gander at the laundry list of infamous European draft picks over the last 20 years:

• Alexander Radojevic (12th overall, 1999 NBA Draft)

• Frederic Weis (15th overall, 1999)

• Darko Milicic (2nd overall, 2003)

• Nikoloz Tskitishvili (5th overall, 2002)

• Fran Vasquez (11th overall, 2005)

• Yaroslav Korolev (12th overall, 2005)

• Victor Claver (22nd overall, 2009)

• Jan Veselý (6th overall, 2011)

Granted, there have been plenty of white American players who have been NBA busts in this time period as well (e.g. Adam Morrison and Jimmer Fredette).

But the “Euro bias” leads to foreign-born players being wildly overvalued and drafted much higher than they should have been.

For example, Ukranian Alex Len was selected fifth overall in 2013 and even considered a potential No. 1 overall selection despite a solid-but-unspectacular career at Maryland. Meanwhile, Duke’s Mason Plumlee out of Fort Wayne, IN, went 17 spots later after being a First-Team All-American as a senior. Len can’t stay healthy and has been very inconsistent in Phoenix while Plumlee - who many people assume is a big white stiff but actually a great athlete - was a solid 15 & 10 guy this past season when Brook Lopez was injured.

What leads to this “Euro bias” among scouts and pundits is anyone’s guess.

Do they have a hard time evaluating European players because it’s hard to measure the competition they play against? Do the “experts” put too much emphasis on individual workouts, where European players always impress with their size and movement against thin air? Do white college players who are generally upper classmen fall prey to the fact NBA executives are always swinging for the fences with “high ceiling” players that “could be the next Dirk Nowitzki”? Is there a stigma attached to being a white American basketball player because so few are currently stars in the NBA?

It could be any or all of these.

No matter the reason, the “Euro bias” has never been more apparent than how devalued Frank Kaminsky has become in the lead up to this week’s draft.

Instead of focusing on him being college basketball’s best player with great footwork, passing ability and shooting range — all typical characteristics of a European big man — scouts and pundits have focused on all the weaknesses in his game and how it won’t translate to the NBA.

What more do they want from this guy?

He was the best player in college basketball who, in his final three games at Wisconsin, put up 29 points on Arizona’s stout defense, schooled Kentucky’s all-world defender Willie Cauley-Stein on 7-of-11 shooting and thoroughly outplayed expected No. 2 overall pick Jahlil Okafor by outscoring him 21 to 10. And yet Kaminsky is projected to be picked behind a player like Myles Turner, who was a non-factor for most of his freshman year at Texas.

Give me a break.

Kaminsky isn’t as athletic or strong as the experts want him to be. Well, after watching them play in the NBA, you could have fooled me that the European busts listed above are strong, great athletes they were billed to be. And if Kaminsky was a European player, I’m willing to bet his weaknesses would be overlooked instead of magnified.

So I put together what some of Kaminsky’s lukewarm draft profiles look like now and what one would look like with the rose-colored glasses used for European big men if he was a Polish-born player by the name of Franciszek Kaminsky.

Frank Kaminsky draft profiles:

Kevin Pelton, ESPN.com: “I don’t know whether I see stardom in the cards for him in the NBA, but I think he could be a valuable — and underrated — role player in the mold of Channing Frye and Spencer Hawes.”

Chad Ford, ESPN.com: “He absolutely looks like the second coming of [Channing] Frye. He won’t be a superstar, but he has a long NBA future ahead of him if he can keep knocking down shots on the perimeter.”

Chris Mannix, SI.com: “Kaminsky is a multi-dimensional offensive player who would play well alongside Al Jefferson. One issue: Kaminsky’s lack of strength, at 22, has scared several executives scouting him.”

Scott Howard-Cooper, NBA.com: “The college Player of the Year lacks strength, so defense could be a challenge, but he should be a good complementary player who can shoot, pass and put the ball on the floor.”

Franciszek Kaminsky draft profile:

“The Polish big man has incredible footwork in the paint and a feathery touch from deep whose game reminds many of Dirk Nowitzki. He’s a lock as a top five pick. Franciszek’s not an elite-level athlete or defender, but runs the floor well for a 7-footer and has a great basketball IQ. He’s also an incredible passer who can flash the same court vision as a point guard. At 22, he’s a late bloomer who is very mature and can contribute right away. A stretch 5, Kaminsky is the kind of big man that the league is trending toward instead of back-to-the-basket centers of yesteryear and he should excel in the new NBA.”

It's now down to only 3 big men ( Kristaps, Trey Lyles, and Kaminsky)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy