Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() Too bad that reports are saying Russell showed impressive hops. That probably keeps him in the top 3. If he's as athletic as Mudiay then it's really no contest, you take Russell who has the shooting already.
Winslow and WCS being 4-5 is very interesting. For one thing Winslow is a 2 way player and now it seems that WCS might have just enough offense to make him a worthy pick. If he's at 5 you can take him at 4 and not be perceived as a reach. The Knicks don't really need a wing as much as they need a big to anchor the D. My money is on WCS at #4. Kaminsky is rising and really he should be. There's so much risk with guys like KrisP and IMO Mario Hezonja too. Why not just take Kaminsky who has proven he's dependable rather than risk on Hezonja or perhaps even Mudiay. Yes Hezonja and Mudiay have the upside but that's also a huge risk cuz neither guy has proven anything. If I was picking 5 or 6 i'm seriously considering Kaminsky.
http://www.draftexpress.com/#ixzz3bsXCZoJu |
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() nixluva wrote:Too bad that reports are saying Russell showed impressive hops. That probably keeps him in the top 3. If he's as athletic as Mudiay then it's really no contest, you take Russell who has the shooting already. If Winslow can use the dribble just tad better he does have a chance to be a really good--there is room and possibility there. It really comes down to how skilled he is with the dribble. The shot is there even if he had a low % on the move. Only a few athletes in this draft skilled and powerful enough to finish at the rim off the dribble. Thats why I like Fuzaro but hes 6-4 190 and Winslow is a beast at 6-6 225. RIP Crushalot😞
|