foosballnick wrote:crzymdups wrote:I'd waive Ledo. Unless we're able to trade Timmy, then I guess Ledo becomes slightly less redundant.
Ledo costs next to nothing in guaranteed salary. Why not evaluate him over the summer league and in camp? Why so quick to want to dump guys for nothing and then also so quick to blasting management for dumping guys for low return?
Just my own opinion that guys like Shumpert and Lin were worth keeping and developing rather than giving away and that Ledo is not. I've certainly been wrong before.
At this point, if it were possible to move Timmy for an actual asset, I would understand the appeal of keeping Ledo around. Perhaps that's the plan - if so, I'm on board with it.
As for blasting management - the only team that has lost more games than the Knicks since 2000 is the T'Wolves and that losing has at least netted them a nucleus of Towns/Okafor, Wiggins, Rubio, Pek, Zach Levine, Shabazz Muhammed, Kevin Garnet, Gary Neal, etc. That's a really good young roster. We have Melo and maybe Galloway and a bunch of question marks and hopefully a nice young player with the 4th pick. Based on Phil's trades so far, I am extremely nervous about the draft and free agency. I am not trying to be overly negative, but I do feel he is making basketball decisions based on an extremely narrow and inflexible rubric and we've already seen the failings in that. He didn't value Tyson or Shumpert or JR and so we got nothing for them. They've proven to be valuable players to other teams, if flawed (which they certainly are), but they have value to other teams. Yet we gave them away. Dallas, for instance, owns the 21st pick in the draft. How did we not get that for Tyson? Cleveland sent two picks for Mozgov. How did we not get one of those for Shumpert and JR? Cleveland made that trade first, implying it was the more important trade to them.