[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

one more question about the marbury trade
Author Thread
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
7/5/2004  2:53 AM
Just to know your opinion.

When, or under which condition, would you consider the marbury tarde as a good trade for the knicks.
AUTOADVERT
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
7/5/2004  4:05 AM
TO me, seeing how Vujanic (was picked what, three years ago?) has never played in the NBA I see the Marbury trade in prinviple as a trade for three #1 picks. The actual two first rounders (mid to late) we gave up, and ONE (Lampe+Vujanic=One NBA player) other pick that was lottery quality.

So a potential lottery pick (pick one of eithe Lampe of Vujanic, not both) , a 16th pick, and a 25th pick ... three draft picks for Marbury.. that's called "drafting well".

The rest was salary filler chump change.

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/5/2004  10:39 AM
the only time the Marbury trade can be (from a Knicks fan viewpoint) veiwed as bad is IF Lampe attains All Star status.

they didn't use this years pick and even if we were using the second pick we gave them- whenever it goes to them- and they pick an all star player- you can't really hold that in judgement- its too far out in the future and subject to too many variables
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/5/2004  10:51 AM
Posted by franco12:

the only time the Marbury trade can be (from a Knicks fan viewpoint) veiwed as bad is IF Lampe attains All Star status.

they didn't use this years pick and even if we were using the second pick we gave them- whenever it goes to them- and they pick an all star player- you can't really hold that in judgement- its too far out in the future and subject to too many variables









I disagree, even if Lampe becomes an all-star (which is possible) I think it still would've been a good trade for us. Marbury in about a year or two will be the best at his position. How often can you get a player like that by only giving up a rookie and vets that are past their prime along with an unproven PG playing in Europe? Yes we also gave two first round picks but seriously, do you guys really think Kirk Snyder will be a better player than Stephon? By the time Phoneix has to use our other first round pick we will probably be a better team and that pick will most likely not be a lottery pick at all. I think any way you look at it, we benefited greatly by doing this deal.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
7/5/2004  11:19 AM
Posted by s3231:
Posted by franco12:

the only time the Marbury trade can be (from a Knicks fan viewpoint) veiwed as bad is IF Lampe attains All Star status.

they didn't use this years pick and even if we were using the second pick we gave them- whenever it goes to them- and they pick an all star player- you can't really hold that in judgement- its too far out in the future and subject to too many variables
I disagree, even if Lampe becomes an all-star (which is possible) I think it still would've been a good trade for us. Marbury in about a year or two will be the best at his position. How often can you get a player like that by only giving up a rookie and vets that are past their prime along with an unproven PG playing in Europe? Yes we also gave two first round picks but seriously, do you guys really think Kirk Snyder will be a better player than Stephon? By the time Phoneix has to use our other first round pick we will probably be a better team and that pick will most likely not be a lottery pick at all. I think any way you look at it, we benefited greatly by doing this deal.
I agree. The Stephon trade is straight up a good trade.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/6/2004  9:37 AM
i considered it a good trade the moment it was announced...the Knicks gave up alot, but they got back alot as well...now, seeing as how the Suns have used the assets they got in that exchange, i don't think there's any question that the Knicks got the better of that deal.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
7/6/2004  9:52 AM
In my opinion, this trade is a GOOD trade regardless of the potential development of lets say Lampe and/or Meatloaf Vujanic( provided he finds his way to the states)

Stephon Marbury is an allstar talent, arguably the 2nd best pg in the league behind J-Kidd and is NYC's hometown baller.. You couldn't ask for a better floor general outside of J-Kidd. People get hung up on his scoring mentality.. but so what? This is a cat that has an avg of like 20 and 8 for a career that aint bad at all.

Then there are the people who are vexed about losing the 16th pick in this yrs draft?? SO WHAT??? Steph is better than all the guards in this years draft.. All the players chosen in this draft are hit and miss.. STEPHON is proven!
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
7/6/2004  3:52 PM
"This is a cat that has an avg of like 20 and 8 for a career that aint bad at all. "

Not only is 20/8 not bad, it's legendary.

Outside of the big O, how many other guards have averaged 20/8 for their careers? Magic maybe? Oscar? There ain't nobody else.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
trueknicksfan
Posts: 20049
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/13/2004
Member: #646
7/6/2004  4:01 PM
marbury trade was just straight up a sweet deal for us
nyvector16
Posts: 21322
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/9/2001
Member: #130
USA
7/6/2004  4:13 PM
Not only was it a good trade.... But it revived a franchise that seemed to be doomed for the next decade...
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/6/2004  4:24 PM
Posted by kam77:

"This is a cat that has an avg of like 20 and 8 for a career that aint bad at all. "

Not only is 20/8 not bad, it's legendary.

Outside of the big O, how many other guards have averaged 20/8 for their careers? Magic maybe? Oscar? There ain't nobody else.








Yep, only Oscar Robertson and Stephon have career averages of 20/8.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/6/2004  4:30 PM
Stats Schmats!

If the Knicks make the playoffs unitl the contracts stop falling off, then Dolan and the fans will be happy.

If Lampe and Kirk Snyder are allstars, and we stay as a mediocre team, then it is bad.

I think the true objective folks it to WIN!

I would much rather Marbs stats fall and we win than him being a 20 and 8 man.

Oscar never won until he got with Alcinder.

Steph is great, but let get him winning. It should be our goal that Isiah is not a big stat guy, but a guy that makes his team better and is known as a winner.
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
7/6/2004  4:48 PM
nice post nalod. You said it, if we start winning, then we'll know how good this trade will have been.

I personaly think that I got a taste of what could be if IT stick to his vision of building a contender.

This "cat" is eager to prove himself wherever he goes.

Only those who try have a chance to win, and this trade was, at least, a try.

A fairly good btw.
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/6/2004  4:50 PM
I think ever since Steph has gotten here he has been all about winning. There have been numerous games when Stephon would only score about 12-14 points but he would dish out around 15 assists and we would end up winning the game. If you do look at his stats ever since he has come to the Knicks his assists have gone up and his points per game has gone down. Obviously the Knicks don't need Stephon to score over 20 points a game when our roster is healthy and I think he has already realized that. That is why having a guy like Stephon is so important because he makes other players around him much better. We all know Steph hates losing and he will do anything he can to make his team win. You just can't go out and get a player like Stephon for nothing, that is why the Marbury trade was such a good trade for us because we added a star player for basically no proven talent whatsoever.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
7/6/2004  8:27 PM
I agree with the sentiment.. "its all about wins and loses" YES!!! But that being said, you can't place such a burden on Stephon Marbury to produce as an individual. It takes a collaborative effort..

The reason im high on the Marbury trade is because it gives NYK one of the key components to winning a championship. I don't care who tells you otherwise.. All championship caliber teams (With the exception of MJ's Bulls) had/have a dominant low post man and a backcourt orchestrator.

Steph Starbury gives NYK a true playmaker in the backcourt.. I also think Stats can be misleading as well, but that applies to marginal players everyone has seen Stephs talents proven consistantly, even throughout his being ridiculed as a "shoot first pg" . His 20 and 8 matter!

Bottom line is... Even if Lampe and Kirk Snyder somehow do become allstars, this trade was still of great benefit to NY. WHY??? because when J-Kidd retires we will undoubtedly have the best point guard in the league, moreover we won't have to wait on those products to develop. We already have an allstar caliber shooting guard when healthy so drafting Snyder probably wouldn't have happened anyway @ 16 for NYK.

People talk about Lampe and Vujanic... like they were gonna be saviors of NY??? Maciej Lampe is young and is gonna need at least 3 PLUS more years to be at the level where most on these boards project.. AND thats if he ever reaches that level. I doubt he'll be Dirk Nowitzki.. in fact i don't think we'll ever see another Dirk prototype.. Dont believe the hype. As for Meatloaf Vujanic.. we see that he aint gone ever come to the US. Bringing Steph home (The Proven Commodity) will help NYK faster than playing the waiting game on draft hopefuls. At least, now this core of Knicks have become more enjoyable to watch. The addition of Starbury was the right move, he compliments Houston as one of the more potent backcourts in the NBA. IF we some how find a dominant low post man (Isiah works his Magic).. We'll be contenders once again!!! The other pieces are in place.

FYI Kirk Snyder is another Courtney Alexander player.. he's good but not great.. drafting him wasn't what NY needed! We more than likely would have gone Big. IMO
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/6/2004  11:18 PM
The trade was a good trade. Getting Steph was just a small part of fixing what Layden did to the Knicks. In 2-3 years we'll be able to bring a great player to New York to play with Marbury who will only be 29-30. Was Lampe gonna be that GREAT player? I don't think so
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/7/2004  3:13 AM
We gave up a lot, and Lampe and Milos might turn out to be good NBA players, but it's still a good trade for us. You get a top 3 PG, and he can turn out to be the best in the league in 3 years. You don't give up on players like that. Plus, Penny still has something in him. We have just as much a chance of winning a championship with Marbury, down the road, as we did with Milos and Lampe, in 5 years.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
nykdunk
Posts: 20629
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #570
USA
7/7/2004  9:51 AM
I would like to disagree, but it's obvious you all hail Marbury as the second coming of Jesus, so I won't bother.
one more question about the marbury trade

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy