callmened wrote:H1AND1 wrote:BRIGGS wrote:NYKBocker wrote:So if we get the 3rd pick or lower then you want Kaminsky? Over Russell?
YEP. Preferably as a trade down add asset deal but I am convinced that Kaminsky is the best candidate here 3 down. I think that will become apparent very quickly in the SL.
In fact Ill go farther. If we get pick #2 if Philly gets pick 6 Ill give then pick #2 for Embidd both #2's and one of their 2016 #1 picks as long as Kaminsky is at 6.
Why is Philly giving up on Embiid so soon? Is there actually Intel out there that they're ready to dump him? Actually curious here.
The thought of a Kaminsky Melo front court gives me nightmares of continual lay up lines by opposing teams. If we are going to go the questionable D route id much rather take Russell who has bonafide star potential. I don't see Kaminsky rising to the become the next K Love. Perhaps a souped up Van Horn with more heart. But no way do I take him with Russell, Winslow, hell even Mudiay on the board.
who said hinkie is giving up on embiid? i think he was only bluffing when saying he'd hear trade offers. lol.
I would think any trade down deal we would make with Philly in this situation is based on our belief that Philly is in love with Russell.
They really wouldn't be "giving up" on Embiid, they'd be gambling that Russell is THE cornerstone piece they desperately need to take their next step.
Where Noel fits in for them seems to be significant... any chance they might feel that Embiid does not work well with Noel style-wise.
I don't know Embiid's game too well at this point, so I would be speculating here.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?