[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Which of these GMs is most likely to draft a bust?


Author Poll
Bonn1997
Posts: 38654
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
Which of these GMs do you think is most likely to draft a bust? These are the 5 worst teams right now.
Phil Jackson (Knicks)
Flip Saunders (Timberwolves)
Sam Hinkie (76ers)
Mike Kupchak (Lakers)
Rob Hennigan (Magic)
View Results


Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
4/3/2015  6:08 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/3/2015  6:09 PM
Flip followed Rob followed by Mitch

It all depends were they are picking. Will be hard to screw up the 1st 5

AUTOADVERT
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/3/2015  6:09 PM
why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?
so here is what phil is thinking ....
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
4/3/2015  6:09 PM
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

Yea that's where I'm getting at. You have to see the draft order first

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/3/2015  6:09 PM
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

because some are worse decision makers than others
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/3/2015  6:10 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

Yea that's where I'm getting at. You have to see the draft order first


A bust can be picked anywhere - starting at #1
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/3/2015  6:11 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

because some are worse decision makers than others

Really hard to predict this unless a GM has a history of reaching and failing.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/3/2015  6:12 PM
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

because some are worse decision makers than others

Really hard to predict this unless a GM has a history of reaching and failing.


You really don't think you can infer anything about a GM's thinking from his trades and signings that would be relevant to drafting?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
4/3/2015  6:17 PM
Not with Phil Jackson
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/3/2015  6:17 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

because some are worse decision makers than others

Really hard to predict this unless a GM has a history of reaching and failing.


You really don't think you can infer anything about a GM's thinking from his trades and signings that would be relevant to drafting?

I guess if they have a history of being old school and relying on old school methodologies such as eye tests and triangles.

A guy like David Kahn who was nontraditional and thought he was a genius was a good example of a bust candidate.

Did you look at the data for the guys you mentioned and how their picks turned out? P

hil has never picked anyone so do you assume that his inexperience may make him more susceptible to a bust?

Where are you going with this? What is your thought process?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/3/2015  6:20 PM
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

because some are worse decision makers than others

Really hard to predict this unless a GM has a history of reaching and failing.


You really don't think you can infer anything about a GM's thinking from his trades and signings that would be relevant to drafting?

I guess if they have a history of being old school and relying on old school methodologies such as eye tests and triangles.

A guy like David Kahn who was nontraditional and thought he was a genius was a good example of a bust candidate.

Did you look at the data for the guys you mentioned and how their picks turned out? P

hil has never picked anyone so do you assume that his inexperience may make him more susceptible to a bust?

Where are you going with this? What is your thought process?


So many people are talking about how thankful we should be that we had this bad year. I just wanted to get a sense of how widespread the denial of the possibility that this whole year was wasted is.
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
4/3/2015  6:20 PM
The first Euro drafted will be a bust.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/3/2015  6:22 PM
knickscity wrote:The first Euro drafted will be a bust.

I have said numerous times that there is no way that we take a euro with a top 4 pick. NO WAY!

I would agree that picking a euro would be grounds for top bust potential (followed by Mudiay)

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/3/2015  6:25 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/3/2015  6:25 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

because some are worse decision makers than others

Really hard to predict this unless a GM has a history of reaching and failing.


You really don't think you can infer anything about a GM's thinking from his trades and signings that would be relevant to drafting?

I guess if they have a history of being old school and relying on old school methodologies such as eye tests and triangles.

A guy like David Kahn who was nontraditional and thought he was a genius was a good example of a bust candidate.

Did you look at the data for the guys you mentioned and how their picks turned out? P

hil has never picked anyone so do you assume that his inexperience may make him more susceptible to a bust?

Where are you going with this? What is your thought process?


So many people are talking about how thankful we should be that we had this bad year. I just wanted to get a sense of how widespread the denial of the possibility that this whole year was wasted is.

would love to see how we would spin a follow up tank next year.

Tanking this year was horrible ... the draft is a crap shoot and you need numerous chances to fail (which we don't have) and what FA's would want to come here not just because we would grossly overpay them?

What has a FA seen from what we are doing here that would get them thinking "I need to get into that system"? I would love to have the chance to play with Ricky Ledo and watch Carmelo ignore me when I am opened.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
4/3/2015  7:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/3/2015  7:25 PM
Did Hinkie draft MCW? That does not bode well.
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
4/3/2015  7:24 PM
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

This is just Bonns way of saying Phil will draft a bust

smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
4/3/2015  7:27 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

because some are worse decision makers than others

Really hard to predict this unless a GM has a history of reaching and failing.


You really don't think you can infer anything about a GM's thinking from his trades and signings that would be relevant to drafting?

I guess if they have a history of being old school and relying on old school methodologies such as eye tests and triangles.

A guy like David Kahn who was nontraditional and thought he was a genius was a good example of a bust candidate.

Did you look at the data for the guys you mentioned and how their picks turned out? P

hil has never picked anyone so do you assume that his inexperience may make him more susceptible to a bust?

Where are you going with this? What is your thought process?


So many people are talking about how thankful we should be that we had this bad year. I just wanted to get a sense of how widespread the denial of the possibility that this whole year was wasted is.

Please post your free agent targets and who you'd draft, so further down the line we can compare your judgement to Phil's. And none of that 'oh I already have somewhere in the past' - time to man up!

Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

4/3/2015  7:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/3/2015  7:31 PM
Another thinly veiled criticism of phil before he's had the chance to make the decision. Why don't you let him draft his guy and then evaluate, this poll is worthless.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/3/2015  7:34 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/3/2015  8:05 PM
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:why would any of them have a better chance of draft busting then another?

This is just Bonns way of saying Phil will draft a bust


No, I definitely don't make guarantees like that. Nix is the one with the crystal ball.
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
4/3/2015  7:35 PM
Dagger wrote:Another thinly veiled criticism of phil before he's had the chance to make the decision. Why don't you let him draft his guy and then evaluate, this poll is worthless.

What I don't get is if people genuinely believe we suck now and will always suck and everything we do will be wrong, why bother following the team? Spend your time more wisely if you genuinely believe this is a doomed enterprise.

Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

4/3/2015  7:36 PM
smackeddog wrote:
Dagger wrote:Another thinly veiled criticism of phil before he's had the chance to make the decision. Why don't you let him draft his guy and then evaluate, this poll is worthless.

What I don't get is if people genuinely believe we suck now and will always suck and everything we do will be wrong, why bother following the team? Spend your time more wisely if you genuinely believe this is a doomed enterprise.

To irritate people that support the team they themselves have given up on.

Which of these GMs is most likely to draft a bust?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy