knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:Phil is the one that made it assured that this team would have this record. He took away any chance the team had to make any kind of comeback this year. He could easily have made desperation moves to bring in some talent and sacrifice even more cap space just to win a few more games this year, but what would that have solved? He did the right thing by flushing this season and looking to start over. It's not like he went all in and did everything humanly possible to try and win this year. Phil clearly went into rebuild mode, so why would he take it out on Fish?With regard to firing his D League coach, why is that even a big deal? They gave him a shot and decided to go with Hodges. It seems to make some sense that Phil would want one of his guys in there who knows the Triangle better and who was brought up in Phil's way of thinking. Who knows what Whitted did in terms of coaching. I can't say that I even know what kind of coach he was. Do any of us know? Maybe they did the guy a favor getting him out of there and he can go somewhere else and perhaps coach in a more comfortable situation and a style that he's more suited to coaching.
Fish is not a good coach..Phil moved JR and Shump for nothing to take the heat off Fish after being booed at MSG in January...It's cool..Just know that it isn't an excuse..The pressure will be on next year to improve...Sub 30 win team wont cut it in NY...
I have a different take on Fish. He came in green but I think he has some talent as a coach and leader of men. It would've helped him if he started the year with a healthy team and guys like JR actually bought in and did their job. No coach can succeed without talent and players buying in. The Knicks weren't losing games by big margins at the start of the year. They simply couldn't close games. We needed more production from our guards, but Jose was injured, THJ was in a sophomore slump and JR was playing like a spazz. You can't win games with poor guard play. You could see the improvement with Galloway and Shved.
With the new players added after the trade you saw a pretty stark improvement in the teams hustle and execution. They still didn't have enough talent but you can tell that with more talent this team would be functioning at a higher level and enough to win games. I simply don't think our biggest issue is Fish. If Phil builds a quality top 6 rotation this team will win games. You can imagine this team playing much better with Melo, Shved, a top pick and a few quality Free Agents making up the rotation.
dude we went from losing games in the final minutes(prior to the trades a waivers) to get blown out by the 3rd quarter, and you seen stark improvement..
It's ok for this misfits he brought in to take as long as they like to figure out the triangle, but the players that were here prior to phil, had 60 days to get it, and they were shipped out. Then you have the nerve to tell me JR was sold low just so we can get rid of shumps expiring contract..how stupid does that sound
Lets get one thing straight about phil, he has gotten rid of damn everyone that dolan gave him the option to get rid of. There's no question in my mind that if it wasn't for dolan, Houston and Mills would be out the door as well, roger hines, and the med staff too.
Anyone phil hired has zero accountabilty
Apparently you still don't get the point of what's been going on since the trade. It wasn't that he was going to fix everything that was wrong and suddenly we'd be a playoff team. Phil was clearing the decks and planning to start over. He already knew that Melo would eventually have to shut it down and at that point the team as going into full on rebuild mode. Had he made a serious of deals for better players that would eat into the cap in an effort to try and win now then I could see the problem, but that's not what he did.
The Knicks actually ran the Triangle better after the trade. The so called misfits figured it out much faster than the guys we got rid of and they played harder too. Apparently you think figuring out the Triangle means they win most of their games. One has nothing to do with the other. Everything is not about W/L's. Players can be executing the offense properly but still lose. They can be doing things right but still fail to convert because they lack the talent to create on their own, finish layups, hit open shots and FT's. If Cole does everything right in running a play and gets all the way to the basket but throws up a brick, that isn't the coach's fault. He simply isn't good enough to convert the play. The players are in the right positions and making the right passes most of the time, but actually being able to beat your man and finish a play is a separate issue. The difference is talent. That's what this summer is all about.
With the D League team I don't know that the record alone was the reason Whitted was fired. I think it was likely how he was handling the prospects and running the system. Who knows for sure?