TripleThreat wrote:BRIGGS wrote:for Thompson Ben Mclemore and their #6/7 pick in the draft. That would give Sacramento their big 3. Its a nice part of the country and Melo would be much closer to a winning situation than he has in any such way here.
Sacramento is the one team where you can't put anything above/below them to do. They just aren't very predictable.
Vivek Ranadive is an absolute gambler in that regard. Would he make a trade for Melo? I'd say Yes.
Would McLemore and a first round, 2nd tier lottery pick be enough? Maybe
Would Melo waive his No Trade Clause to go to Sacramento? No, I can't see it. It would take something like a major divorce and scandal for it to happen.
I do believe that if Ranadive could sit down with Melo, he could explain to him how anyone can be marketed anywhere, I'm just not sure Melo would even understand that. The other issue is no matter what kind of major marketing strategy you have to try to "brand" yourself, the general public will not tend to embrace a guy who hasn't won a championship and on top of that, a guy who seems like a mercenary.
Analysts panned both the Rudy Gay and Darren Collision moves and yet both weren't the giant sinkholes as predicted.
Ranadive might be trying to model what the Cincy Bengals did a decade ago, which is become a haven for wayward talent.
Tyler Perry isn't making his sub standard Madea ready for cable all black cast movies in Sacto though. Melo would literally need to be divorced for this to happen.
Its a good high quality trade for both teams. I think that makes Sacramento on par with many teams talent wise--the harder work is done there.
The Knicks acquire a @G that has the ability in year 3 to rise to a 15-17 point SG and 2 top 7 picks in which the experts are calling the best draft since Carmelo was drafted AND an additional 8-10mm in cap space for this year.
That would give us a starting 2 G 40mm in cash to spend and 2 top 7 picks. Its better for both teams. It would give Phil Jackson a chance to truly mold a team the way he wanted to.