fishmike wrote:fishmike wrote:I wanted to pick Galloway but Childs is ahead at this point. I think Langston can be better than Childs but Chris was still a good player. He could score, good on the ball defender, hit some 3s... he had swagger, a killer instinct?
your an idiot
I'll withhold comment on your multiple personalities.
Childs and Ward were more polished as PGs. Not sure Galloway is as good of a ball handler. I think he'll be a better shooter, and hope that he will be able to play defense like those two did. Childs could be tenacious on D, which made up for some disappointments on the offensive end.
Childs was not in the NBA until 27, by the way, so any NBA comparison with Galloway is somewhat unfair. Give Galloway another 4 years of seasoning and you might be able to compare them as players.
Ward developed a pretty decent 3 pointer, but I expected him to be better on the offensive end.
Ward and Childs both disappointed in certain ways, and I expected more out of them, but both were hard nosed PGs who had their moments.
One thing you always have to consider is how their D would hold up today, where physical play on the perimeter has essentially been eliminated from the game.
I just don't see Galloway as a primary ball handler in our future offense, but he should get better as he becomes more comfortable in the role.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
3/21/2015 8:37 PM
