This type of thought only has led to multi year misery.
Ill just go back and say one trade Mcdyess. This would be Mcdyess part 2 but worse.
I look at things this way--we have one asset in the draft and we have 30mm+ in free agency. The combination of assets to help build a team trumps one player not named Lebron. It makes your roster unbalanced.
If I can look into the past at BIg 3's they all play pivot forward guard--every time. You'd be putting nearly what 60mm in just one position if Durant resigned for a new max. And worse if he decided to leave after 1 year like Dwight Howard did--how did that work out for the Lakers?
I would take Duarnt only under this condition.
Carmelo is traded
We have the cap space to give Durant and he is 110% healthy in 2016
We have already started the process of diversifying the talent on our team. There is no other way. When we traded for Carmelo--the asset allocation from the trade killed us for 4 years. Unless the players are in place and its reasonable you CANNOT combine free agency and a high draft pick.
There is a better than 50% chance historically that the draft pick is a franchise player and who could be within 2-3 years better all around than Durant by himself. Then we say what couldve happened in free agency could we pair Towns Kanter and use the rest of small smart upside moves? Ill say this all night--Towns and Kanter COMBINED are FAR FAR FAR better than 1 Durant. Not even close.