galloway has been doing fine...

BasketballJones wrote:No, they should question everything he says and does often and publicly. They should also muzzle him and force him to conduct his interviews by the roadside. Finally, when done with him, they should humiliate him on the David Letterman show (bring Dave out of retirement for this). Finally, have a gang of security guards lead him handcuffed out of the garden in the middle of a nationally broadcast game. That's the MSG way.

BasketballJones wrote:

fishmike wrote:

BasketballJones wrote:No, they should question everything he says and does often and publicly. They should also muzzle him and force him to conduct his interviews by the roadside. Finally, when done with him, they should humiliate him on the David Letterman show (bring Dave out of retirement for this). Finally, have a gang of security guards lead him handcuffed out of the garden in the middle of a nationally broadcast game. That's the MSG way.

Letterman retired?

Well, he announced that he is retiring, but he still seems to be there. My bad.

HAHA.. after my 9th grade they changed the attendance policy. I only missed 9 days of school. But I was tardy 108 days. Funny... I didnt feel tardy.

Ahhh... high school

MaTT4281 wrote:Should they trust his assessments? Phil will have the reports from the scouts, his own observations, and yes I'm sure will have a conversation with Fish. Ultimately the decision is Phil's. Are you really that concerned about Fisher's role in this?

Question - should Fisher be invited to the MSG Christmas party?

So funny. Wondering WTF is up 1969's arse re: Fisher. Did you get bullied by a Fisher in middle school or sumpin?

Knicks1969 wrote:

Moonangie wrote:

MaTT4281 wrote:Should they trust his assessments? Phil will have the reports from the scouts, his own observations, and yes I'm sure will have a conversation with Fish. Ultimately the decision is Phil's. Are you really that concerned about Fisher's role in this?

Question - should Fisher be invited to the MSG Christmas party?

So funny. Wondering WTF is up 1969's arse re: Fisher. Did you get bullied by a Fisher in middle school or sumpin?

I simply don't trust the dude to lead the Knicks out of the dump dudes. He has not done anything that says he will be a good coach.

Why are some of you so sensitive when it comes to Fisher? What in the world has he done to warrant your respect or adulation?

He's a rookie coach. You would probably have been one of the guys calling for Kidd to be fired when he was struggling with the Nets in his 1st year. Phil wanted a young coach he could mold and mentor. He wasn't looking for a ready made and fully seasoned coach who was set in his ways. So that being the case why should we be in a rush to judge what he's going to end up being? From what i've seen he's been able to get these guys to execute the offense properly but at a certain point you have to have some talent to make shots, create and finish plays. Our players aren't that good. They're inconsistent at best.

For any coach the more capable his players are on their own the more he can do. Some players make a coach look way better. Obviously if you have a CP3 or Curry or other good players it makes the job that much easier for the coach. If you have nothing but fringe players then it will make your coach's job that much harder.

nixluva wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:

Moonangie wrote:

MaTT4281 wrote:Should they trust his assessments? Phil will have the reports from the scouts, his own observations, and yes I'm sure will have a conversation with Fish. Ultimately the decision is Phil's. Are you really that concerned about Fisher's role in this?

Question - should Fisher be invited to the MSG Christmas party?

So funny. Wondering WTF is up 1969's arse re: Fisher. Did you get bullied by a Fisher in middle school or sumpin?

I simply don't trust the dude to lead the Knicks out of the dump dudes. He has not done anything that says he will be a good coach.

Why are some of you so sensitive when it comes to Fisher? What in the world has he done to warrant your respect or adulation?

He's a rookie coach. You would probably have been one of the guys calling for Kidd to be fired when he was struggling with the Nets in his 1st year. Phil wanted a young coach he could mold and mentor. He wasn't looking for a ready made and fully seasoned coach who was set in his ways. So that being the case why should we be in a rush to judge what he's going to end up being? From what i've seen he's been able to get these guys to execute the offense properly but at a certain point you have to have some talent to make shots, create and finish plays. Our players aren't that good. They're inconsistent at best.

For any coach the more capable his players are on their own the more he can do. Some players make a coach look way better. Obviously if you have a CP3 or Curry or other good players it makes the job that much easier for the coach. If you have nothing but fringe players then it will make your coach's job that much harder.

You are right. In the beginning of Kidd's career, I wasn't too enamored with him, but along the way, he proved that he was worthy;specifically, after he got rid of L Frank.

After these many games, I am still confused about what Fisher is trying to accomplish. One week he uses Acy as his starter, and suddenly, he sees no use for the dude. Now he has a hard on for Shved, after a couple of games, he will look to play someone else. This dude is too Schizophrenic for me as a coach; his many lineups have rendered me nauseated. A good coach would never use this many starting lineups.

fishmike wrote:"serial truant"

HAHA.. after my 9th grade they changed the attendance policy. I only missed 9 days of school. But I was tardy 108 days. Funny... I didnt feel tardy.

Ahhh... high school

wow...i can't even remember high school. Dang.