[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Realistically, how many rookies will be added?
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/28/2004  8:39 PM
I know people are excited about Lamizana, Ariza, Barret, and other locals, but it's hard to imagine there being a roster spot for more than one, especially if they play the same position. I doubt more than one of Lamizana, DerMarr, and Ariza will make the team unless two of them are unbelievable in the summer league.
AUTOADVERT
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
6/28/2004  8:41 PM
I'd say only 2, and it'll probably be for spots on the IL.

I'm happy with DerMarr and Ariza though.
#Knickstaps
VDesai
Posts: 42731
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
6/28/2004  8:51 PM
Probably only 1 unless we can really dump some deals. You have to consider we'll also be adding guys with the MLE, LLE etc. And we may even split the MLE so there could be as many as 3 FA's brought in. I'm just happy there's competition this year and the fact that there are some legit prospects despite not having a first round pick.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/28/2004  9:41 PM
Actually, I just noticed the Knicks have 13 players already under contracts for next season. Without substantial trades (these 2 or 3 for 1 deals are much harder to pull off than anyone thinks), there probably will be room for zero rookies.

Trybanski might just get waived. His expiring contract is small enough to not really be much of a trade asset

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 06/28/2004 21:42:42]
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
6/28/2004  10:10 PM
my prediction is that we will rid ourselves with at least three current players by mid July. Look for Trybanski, Deke, Kurt, Anderson, and Harrington to be gone. I am very confident of that.
The true Knickabocker..........
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/28/2004  10:28 PM
I think it will only be one rookie considering we have many players already under contract and we will probably add 2 players via free agency. If there is more than 1 rookie that players very well though Isiah will most likely find room for him on the roster either by trade or buying out someone's contract.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/28/2004  10:30 PM
Posted by diderotn:

my prediction is that we will rid ourselves with at least three current players by mid July. Look for Trybanski, Deke, Kurt, Anderson, and Harrington to be gone. I am very confident of that.
Yeah, but that doesn't free up spaces because you have to take back players in trades, unless you pull off a 2 or 3 for 1 trade, which is always much easier said than done
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/28/2004  10:58 PM
Its the knicks, Ariza will be lucky to make the team! Or any of the rest of them.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
6/29/2004  12:58 AM
Anderson and Norris have to be bought out.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/29/2004  8:50 AM
Posted by Rich:

Anderson and Norris have to be bought out.
keep dreaming
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2004  10:07 AM
a 2 for 1, 3 for 1 type deal needs to be made...another reason why the Antoine Walker trade idea appeals to me...it would free up more roster spots for guys like Ariza, DerMarr & Lamizana to have a shot at making this roster.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38411
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/29/2004  10:17 AM
The only way we get rid of some players is by taking on a HUGE contract. An example would be Antoine Walker. We send them anywhere from...

KT/Deke/Othella OR
KT/Deke/Moochie OR
KT/Shandon/FWIll (We need to give them something for them to take Shandon)

Portland would be another good trading partner for Rahim. Same trade scenario since the have identical contracts.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/29/2004  10:17 AM
When was the last time the Knicks pulled off a 3 for 1 trade? They're easy to talk about, but you're just dreaming
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2004  10:22 AM
the Mavs & Wizards just pulled 1 off a couple days ago...why can't the Knicks do the same? even if it's not Walker, what's to say there isn't another team out there that isn't willing to take on 3 expiring deals to unload a bigger contract of their own?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38411
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/29/2004  10:25 AM
Another trade that would clear some roster space would be

Antonio Davis/JYD for
Shandon/KT/Deke/Othella


Davis would be an excellent trades asset come trading deadline. Basically, we swap unwanted contracts for each other. Shandon is shorter but more money per year.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/29/2004  10:26 AM
Posted by TMS:

the Mavs & Wizards just pulled 1 off a couple days ago...why can't the Knicks do the same? even if it's not Walker, what's to say there isn't another team out there that isn't willing to take on 3 expiring deals to unload a bigger contract of their own?
sure, every once in a while a team pulls off that kind of trade; it's just extremely rare and not something I would expect to happen.
daddynel
Posts: 21222
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 12/2/2003
Member: #505
6/29/2004  8:46 PM
kurt & deke for crawford (sign & trade) & jyd. if they want f.will, so be it. gotta do whatcha gotta do frankie, we love but bye!
buy out trybanski.
then a 2 for 1 of some sort. does'nt have to be major at all. we'd have the right ingredients w/the exception of a true center. that would give us a 10 or 11 player roster. room for ariza & chan w/room to spare. maybe our 2 for 1 can include shandon, or moochie.
daddynel
Posts: 21222
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 12/2/2003
Member: #505
6/29/2004  8:48 PM
btw, we'd still have our MLE and LLE.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/29/2004  8:58 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:

Another trade that would clear some roster space would be

Antonio Davis/JYD for
Shandon/KT/Deke/Othella


Davis would be an excellent trades asset come trading deadline. Basically, we swap unwanted contracts for each other. Shandon is shorter but more money per year.

you'd have to get more than that from the Bulls if you were taking on those horrible contracts...try working JC in there somehow, or at least a future 1st round pick.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
joec32033
Posts: 30609
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
6/29/2004  11:48 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by NYKBocker:

Another trade that would clear some roster space would be

Antonio Davis/JYD for
Shandon/KT/Deke/Othella


Davis would be an excellent trades asset come trading deadline. Basically, we swap unwanted contracts for each other. Shandon is shorter but more money per year.

you'd have to get more than that from the Bulls if you were taking on those horrible contracts...try working JC in there somehow, or at least a future 1st round pick.

KT/Othella/Mutumbo/Nazr for Crawford/AD/Curry or Chandler....
~You can't run from who you are.~
Realistically, how many rookies will be added?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy