[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

A Trade to Get Shaq
Author Thread
MaTT4281
Posts: 33803
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
6/21/2004  10:13 PM
Posted by 1:
Posted by MaTT4281:

Im wit TMS on this...theres other teams that can offer LA more desirable players than TT, Walker, and Sweets.

Like who?

miami might be willing to send grant/odom/jones (any 2 of them) to LA for shaq
AUTOADVERT
turtle33
Posts: 20127
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #537
Canada
6/21/2004  10:15 PM
shaq cant win with payton kobe and malone on his team, what makes you guys think he can win with steph, houston and kurt?

also why do we trade the rest of our future for an old, somewhat injured, most of the time out of shape player?

if this was 4 years ago, as much as i hate shaq i would say okay to getting him. i honestly think he is done. he got abused by the "wallace brothers".

he definatly doesnt make us "younger and more athletic"

you guys might want to sit down for this one but i think we can do alot better at centre than shaq (without trading our future).
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/21/2004  10:21 PM
uh, you might want to check his statline in the Finals this year before you say that he got abused by the Wallace brothers...if anyone was abusing anyone, it was Shaq making Big Ben Wallace look pretty small...it's not his fault no one else showed up to play that series...you think if Kobe, Payton & Malone were playing up to their full potential, they would have been dismissed as easily as they were?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
MaTT4281
Posts: 33803
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
6/21/2004  10:25 PM
I think shaq still won the battle of the bigmen in the finals, the wallaces just defended him better than other teams and were able to do it without double teams
MaTT4281
Posts: 33803
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
6/21/2004  10:36 PM
actually, heres an article bout who la should trade with.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=aldridge_david&id=1825532

1
Posts: 20195
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #575
Burkina Faso (Upper Volta)
6/22/2004  4:07 PM
Rught now, the Knicks are the only realistic Eastern COnference option. I really don't think Miami is interested. The two West Conference teams that make the most sense are Memphis and Dallas. However, Buss would hate to see Shaw end up with the Logo. They might end up going with Dallas if Dallas is willing to give up Dirk but they would still be making Dallas a powerhouse. If the Lakers want to keep Shaq in the Eastern Conference then the Knicks can be a major player.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
6/22/2004  6:52 PM
Jermaine has and is the Pacer Franchise for the next 15 years. Shaq is not young, slow and not as dominant as he used to be. I dont think Larry will gamble. Don't forget, Jermaine is only 23.

It would take more that Odom but I think you are right. Miami would trade for Shaq in a second if it were a possibility.

There is no way the Nets can get Shaq.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
A Trade to Get Shaq

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy